Remove Blogging Remove Copying Remove False Advertising
article thumbnail

False Patent Marking as False Advertising: Overcoming Dastar

Patently-O

Dawgs’ (“Dawgs”) counterclaim for false advertising under the Lanham Act. In 2016, Dawgs added new asserted counterclaims against Crocs, including a claim for false advertising under the Lanham Act. Crocs largely prevailed in those actions. 1125(a)(1)(B) (Section 43 of the Lanham Act).

article thumbnail

Section 230 Helps Amazon Defeat False Advertising Lawsuit Over Printer Ink Cartridges–Planet Green v. Amazon

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The court simply responds: “the Ninth Circuit has held that Section 230 immunity applies to false advertising claims and other claims that are based on purportedly false representations.” As my blog coverage makes clear, I am not a fan of those opinions). Last week I blogged M.S. Google opinion.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Announcing the Sixth Edition of Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases & Materials by Tushnet & Goldman

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Price: $9.99. * Print-on-demand hard copy from Amazon. Buyers of the hard copy can also get a free PDF file by emailing me a copy of their receipt showing which edition they bought. If you are a professor, or are hoping to teach the course, and would like a free evaluation copy, please email me (egoldman@gmail.com).

Editing 126
article thumbnail

Announcing the Seventh Edition of Advertising & Marketing Law Casebook by Tushnet & Goldman

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Paperback buyers can get a free PDF file by emailing me a copy of their receipt showing which edition they bought. If you are a professor, or are hoping to teach the course, and would like a free evaluation copy, please email me (egoldman@gmail.com). Preface Chapter 1: Overview Chapter 2: What is an Advertisement?

Editing 98
article thumbnail

statements to investors not probative of commercial ad/promotion in Lanham Act case

43(B)log

26, 2022) [much other stuff skipped] The parties had a false advertising dispute that went to a jury, which found that FIGS wasn’t liable for falsely advertising the antimicrobial properties of its scrubs. Since the court had some interesting evidentiary rulings, I’m blogging that here.

article thumbnail

Drake and 21 Savage May Have More (Legal) Issues Than Vogue

IPilogue

The artists also mimicked Vogue’s promotional activities by distributing copies of the fake magazine in North America’s largest metropolitan areas, including New York, Los Angeles, Atlanta, Miami, Houston, and Toronto, and plastering posters of the counterfeit cover along streets and buildings in these cities.

article thumbnail

This Case Keeps Wrecking Internet Law–Enigma v. Malwarebytes

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

After remand, the case went back to the Ninth Circuit, which held that anti-threat classifications might be Lanham Act false advertising. Today I’m blogging the district court decision after that remand. Bleeping Computer , where the court found that self-laudatory blog posts were ads. Blog post on amicus briefs.

Law 59