This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This is a case focusing on ownership of socialmedia accounts. We blogged this case twice before. See “ SocialMedia Ownership Disputes Part II: Bridal Wear Company Takes Back Control of Instagram Account from Ex-Employee ” and “ Another Confused Entry in the SocialMedia Account Ownership Jurisprudence–JLM v. (See
[Warning: this is a 5,600 word blog post]. There are two critically important cases over “socialmedia addiction” pending in California state court and as an MDL in the federal Northern District of California. Despite the importance of those Fall 2023 rulings, I never blogged either.
Nicklen “urged his socialmedia followers to consider the ‘haunting’ and ‘soul-crushing scene’ and to take steps to mitigate the harms of climate change.” Use of content posted to socialmedia has generated many posts on this blog, starting with AFP v. United Sports.
[I blogged the Supreme Court oral arguments in the NetChoice cases yesterday. That decision could have significant implications for this case as well as all other First Amendment challenges of states’ efforts to censor socialmedia.] I previously blogged the TRO. To enable greater government censorship of speech? (I
The Texas socialmedia censorship law remains temporarily enjoined by the Fifth Circuit pending Supreme Court review, but Davis couldn’t wait. Davis claimed that Texas’ socialmedia censorship law preempted the TOS venue clause. Davis argued that the TOSes are contracts of adhesion.
The last time we blogged this case , the district court had sided with JLM, initially restricting Gutman’s use of the socialmedia accounts and then awarding control over the accounts to JLM. What does a 200+ year old fox have to say about who owns socialmedia accounts?). ” (Cite to Pierson v.
The opinion holds that the key parts of Florida’s socialmedia censorship law (SB 7072) likely violate the First Amendment and should remain enjoined. ” The opinion also highlights the madness of the Fifth Circuit allowing the Texas socialmedia censorship law to take effect via a 1-line order. “S.B.
June 14, 2024) The post Reusing SocialMedia Photos for Ads? 1 Hotel appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Case Citation : Khachatryan v. 1 Hotel West Hollywood LLC , 2024 WL 3015504 (C.D. Be Careful!–Khachatryan –Khachatryan v.
— Bright Data has long sold the data of all the major socialmedia companies. sued Bright Data for trespass to chattels, breach of contract, tortious interference with a contract, violation of California Business and Professions Code Section 17200, and misappropriation. In November 2023, X corp. on all counts.
In February, Meta lost on Partial Summary Judgment against Bright Data on its breach of contract claim. had its breach of contract and CFAA claims against the Center for Countering Digital Hate (“CCDH”) dismissed at the motion to dismiss stage. Here, the court muddles the various contract formation standards.
22, 2021): companies now pay so-called “influencers” to issue posts on socialmedia touting their products or services. Reminder: courts sometimes demand that consumers click twice to form a contract. Advertising/E-Commerce. Ariix, LLC v. NutriSearch Corp., 2021 WL 221878 (9th Cir Jan. Lona’s Lil Eats, LLC v. Handle, Inc.,
Plaintiffs CAN’T WAIT to sue Internet services using the Texas socialmedia censorship law. Nevertheless, the plaintiffs argued that the law “evidences a strong public policy to protect Texans from wrongful censorship on socialmedia platforms.” appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
Many of my clients have contractors or vendors or virtual assistants who assist them with writing blog posts, creating newsletters, doing socialmedia posting and work. First, contracts. Make sure you have proper contracts. And there’s nothing wrong with that, of course. So be on the lookout for that.
Also in 2018, FDN filed the original complaint, targeting both Amazon and CCA, alleging that they both breached contracts and committed copyright infringement. There wasn’t even a system for registering blog content, like this site, until June 2020. But this is where FDN introduces a new wrinkle.
The screenshots are also excused: “Single still-frame screenshots from videos posted on socialmedia platforms, which make up a very small fraction of the original video, are generally considered to constitute de minimis use and fall below the substantial similarity threshold.” Lynk Media LLC v. IHeartMedia, Inc.,
But before they get there, these courts must first decide whether AA’s terms and conditions constitutes a valid and enforceable contract, and whether TPG assented to its terms. Power Ventures involved a socialmedia aggregator’s consensual use of its users’ Facebook passwords to access their Facebook accounts. Facebook v.
This is one of the dozens of lawsuits alleging that socialmedia services addict kids. Jones-based personal jurisdiction over Snap based on the plaintiffs’ allegations that: Defendants acted intentionally when they entered into contracts with M.K., Snap has entered into contracts with thousands of Oregon residents.
Republished by Blog Post PromoterIt’s the Singularity a-borning! On the two-year anniversary of my joining Goetz Fitzpatrick LLP, a law firm predominantly focused on construction law, I’ve written a blog post, as a guest of high-octane social-media-juicing lawyer Christopher Hill at his Construction Law Musings blog.
For example, the most aggressive companies in pursuing web-scraping litigation are the socialmedia companies. And while their terms of use provide the socialmedia companies a license to use that user-generated content, it is their users who typically have a copyright interest in their content.
Much digital ink has been spilled on online contract formation; much less on online contract termination. Plaintiffs alleged that Facebook and LinkedIn agreed to divvy up the socialmedia market “between 2013 and 2016.” Guest Blog Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
Blog post coverage of that ruling here. ” “Plaintiff appears to argue Twitter’s placement of information in “socialmedia feeds” renders it an information content provider. . Contract Breach. Twitter appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. The user tried again. Same result.
She tattooed the Sedlik photo onto Farmer and promoted the tattoo on socialmedia. “no one has told [Sedlik] they would not buy a copy of the Portrait because they had seen the Tattoo or socialmedia posts about the Tattoo.” Prior Tattoo Copyright Blog Posts. She now does her tattoo artistry pro bono.
Defendants also managed the socialmedia presence of the “La Baguette” business, which primarily consisted of a Facebook page. Breach of Contract : Plaintiffs only alleged a contract claim, based on breach of a non-compete, against the one defendant who had signed the non-compete. See generally, Christopher A.
Eugene Volokh’s blog post that was endorsed by Justice Thomas. Building off the Railway Employees v Hanson and Denver Area cases and Volokh’s blog post, Huber claimed that Section 230 was unconstitutional. See this blog post for more. In his blog post, Prof. This case had two minor twists. Section 230.
In a November ruling, a magistrate judge notes that the lawsuit appears to be the first of its kindone in which a socialmedia influencer accuses another influencer of (among other things) copyright infringement based on the similarities between their posts that promote the same products. Sydney Nicole LLC v. Sydney Nicole LLC v.
The user took the matter to court (pro se), where the lawsuit failed: Contract Breach. This case also highlights the stakes of the individualized explanations requirement in the TX and FL socialmedia censorship laws if those survive constitutional scrutiny. Google appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
In response to a user’s complaint against a socialmedia platform that had deleted his post and blocked his account, the Higher Regional Court of Hamm reasoned in a very similar way. This is how they looked then: For reasons I won’t bore you with, my blog software makes it painful to embed these graphics.
Power Ventures was a platform that attempted to enable users to manage all their socialmedia accounts from one platform. Booking (Guest Blog Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Power Ventures was a 2016 case involving Facebook (back when the company itself was still known as Facebook).
See my blog post on the lower court ruling. Prager tried a variety of contract-based workarounds to Section 230. Going beyond the contracts, Prager looks to various “promises” it alleges that defendants made through public-facing comments. YouTube defended on Section 230 and other grounds.
That legal standard could devastate socialmedia usage in Australia. It increases the risk that ordinary socialmedia users could be liable for defamation caused by their so-called friends. That risk encourages socialmedia users to actively police the comments of their friends–or stop posting entirely.
Record labels, like several companies, have turned to TikTok and other socialmedia platforms to market their products. Since radio and television have mostly lost their influence among the younger generation, it is important for record labels to utilise socialmedia platforms, like TikTok to engage their fanbase.
Thus, Lady Freethinker sued YouTube for breach of contract and related claims. (A I’m ignoring the complicating effects of various socialmedia censorship laws that may require Internet services to enforce their TOSes as written, a requirement I think is unconstitutional). ” [Discussing Cross v. .”
There are formal contracts to outline the finer points and, in such cases, licensed professionals are involved to help the athlete understand their legal obligations. Further, it is more likely to be a verbal agreement or one made over socialmedia. To form a contract, three main ingredients are required.
ICS provider: “message boards and socialmedia sites qualify as ‘interactive computer services.'” Twitter appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. ” Third party content: Plaintiff “is responsible for the creation of his tweets, which were circulated via Twitter.”
It represents a rare federal intervention into contract law, and it does so for good reasons–to reduce the ability of businesses to manipulate the consumer review ecosystem by wiping away negative reviews and leaving only positive reviews. See my extensive blog coverage of Medical Justice.
I posted a chapter from the book: Online Contracts. How Fair Use Helps Bloggers Publish Their Research , Association of Research Libraries blog, Feb. Blog Posts. I’ve blogged 100+ posts so far this year. Will California Clone-and-Revise Some Terrible Ideas from Florida/Texas’ SocialMedia Censorship Laws?
2, 2022): Nor does personal jurisdiction arise out of the Film Defendants’ so-called “advertising strategy,” which allegedly “featured a significant push on socialmedia[ ] targeting Washington, DC residents via Instagram and Facebook.” targeted socialmedia advertising. Prior blog post. * The settlement agreement.
In March 2020, she contracted a respiratory illness. The court agrees, in an opinion filled with numerous gems and zingers supporting free speech, such as: “Even if short and often grammatically scurrilous, socialmedia posts do not fall outside the ambit of the First Amendment. She posted on Instagram that she had COVID.
Supervising communication strategy of the programme’s work and activities to various audiences through reports, outreach materials, socialmedia, updates for newsletters, blogs, and websites etc. The contract may be terminated by providing a 15 day notice from either side. No additional benefits/perks will be provided.
This blog post will show how data snarfers vex the courts and expose unfortunate gaps in existing legal doctrines. * * *. BrandTotal “provides advertising consulting services to corporate clients regarding how those clients’ and their competitors’ digital advertisements are presented to socialmedia users.”
There have been other decisions involving BIPA, NBA 2K, and sometimes AWS that I haven’t comprehensively blogged. This case involves the videogame NBA 2K, not a stranger to this blog. Amazon appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. The court shrugs its shoulders. Amazon Web Services Inc.,
On the one hand, socialmedia has enabled global sharing of news and creative media. E: What advice would you give to fellow artists and makers on socialmedia on sharing their work? E: What would you like to see happen in terms of the culture of socialmedia artists and their followers?
In a highly technical ruling, the court rejects Twitter’s CFAA claim on a motion to dismiss and rejects Twitter’s other claims, including breach of contract, on an anti-SLAPP motion to strike. RIPTwitter. * * * Most readers should stop reading the blog post here. Breach of Contract Twitter’s TOS bans scraping.
Shared sued Facebook for: Shared avers that Meta committed conversion (Claim 1), breach of contract (Claim 3), and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing (Claim 4) in suspending access to Shared’s Facebook pages, contrary to the Facebook Terms of Service.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content