This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy The intersection of the Federal Arbitration Act and the law of online contracts has become utterly corrosive to our legal system. The problem with the FAA and online contracts, of course, is that no one is agreeing to arbitrate anything. Consumer Contracts (Tent. Many people think this is true.
If the issue lies in loopholes within the ToS, the solution seems straightforward: draft tighter contracts and perhaps incorporate a browsewrap on your platforms to catch those who don’t hold accounts. X’s breach of contract cases against CCDH for violating its ToS by scraping also didn’t fare well. In 2022, in ML Genius v.
sued Bright Data for trespass to chattels, breach of contract, tortious interference with a contract, violation of California Business and Professions Code Section 17200, and misappropriation. Here, the court agreed, and dismissed Twitter’s breach-of-contract claims on that basis. In November 2023, X corp. on all counts.
Copyrightability The case sets up one of the longstanding open questions in copyright law: when are form contracts copyrightable, and when is sharing them infringing? ” Due to that concession, questions about the copyrightability of form contracts will continue to fester. As such, defendant made the Forms available.”
Intellectual property rights may be established, protected, or granted to another party by contracts or agreements. Considering that the subject matter is so complex, the law regarding contracts is usually handled by lawyers who specialize in it.
The court confirms that to ensure enforceability, consumers should (1) check the box and (2) be advised that checking the box will indicate assent to contract terms. These basic principles “apply with equal force to contracts formed online.” See blog posts on those rulings here and here.). Freedom Financial Network, LLC.
What’s the difference between a cohabitation agreement and marriage contract? Watch as Rebekah Schultz explains the ins and outs of cohabitation agreements and marriage contracts. Part 1: Part 2: Part 3: The post Cohabitation agreements and marriage contracts appeared first on Nelligan Law.
In February, Meta lost on Partial Summary Judgment against Bright Data on its breach of contract claim. had its breach of contract and CFAA claims against the Center for Countering Digital Hate (“CCDH”) dismissed at the motion to dismiss stage. Here, the court muddles the various contract formation standards. No, it does not.
Reminder: courts sometimes demand that consumers click twice to form a contract. The post 1H 2021 Quick Links, Part 4 (Advertising, Contracts, & More) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. . * Lona’s Lil Eats, LLC v. DoorDash, Inc., 2021 WL 151978 (N.D. New Yorker : Dude, Where’s My Couch?
The court also created a new definition of browsewrap that further plunges online contract formation law into anarchy. * * *. If the buyers went to Walmart.com after they made the purchase, then the terms seek to amend an existing contract formed at the time of purchase. (I’ve This case involves Walmart gift cards.
Epic also filed a separate petition requesting Supreme Court review of the lower court’s rejection of certain antitrust claims, but this blog only discusses the petition filed by Apple.) and upheld on appeal by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Given that Apple, not the individual app developers, insisted that all U.S.
Reading Time: 2 minutes What is Frustration of Contract? Contract frustration occurs when a contractual obligation can no longer be performed, with no fault to either party. This occurs when a situation arises, causing the contract’s performance to become “a thing radically different from that which was undertaken by the contract”.
Contracts are a state-law issue. And online contracts, even though they exist in the friction-less, boundary-less world of the internet, are also generally governed by state-law principles. There are relatively few state-court cases with outsized influence in the law of online contracts. By guest blogger Kieran McCarthy.
Eric’s Prior Tattoo Copyright Blog Posts. Also, see Q2 of my 2005 contracts law exam and the sample answer. WWE 2K (Guest Blog Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. In short, opportunistic lawsuits brought by a handful of tattooers run the risk of devastating the industry as a whole.
Moritz College of Law The copyright – contract tension Stewart Brand famously said that information wants to be free. The flexibility of contracts makes them a prime candidate for restricting uses that copyright law leaves unprohibited. That still leaves a rather broad space for contract law to effectively limit the use of information.
Much digital ink has been spilled on online contract formation; much less on online contract termination. Guest Blog Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Based on a quick review of Facebook’s and Instagram’s Terms of Use, those agreements do not provide for a clear path for a user to terminate.
But before they get there, these courts must first decide whether AA’s terms and conditions constitutes a valid and enforceable contract, and whether TPG assented to its terms. Breach of Contract 2. Tortious Interference with a Contract 3. The Points Guy (Guest Blog Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
Still, it seems troublesome because it ignores that some contract was formed at point of purchase, and those terms should be relevant to governing the device and possibly whether or not the service TOS is an amendment, a conflicting contract, or something else. BONUS: Additional contracts links from the past six months.
In this episode of The Briefing by the IP Law Blog , Scott Hervey and Josh Escovedo discuss the trademark and contract issues that Adidas is navigating with shoe designs and related designs in the future. Listen to the podcast of this episode here.
Google’s ISPs were obligated under their contract with Google to provide “‘[r]emote assistance services,’ which ‘involve[d] basic maintenance activities’ … if requested by Google.” The post The Legal Implications of Datacenter Location (Guest Blog Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
Even if Google’s conduct could be interpreted as a technical violation of many websites’ notoriously overbroad terms of service, their conduct doesn’t meet the criteria for most online breach of contract disputes. Trademark, copyright, trespass to chattels, the law of online contracts—none of this stuff is novel.
Now, the primary vehicle to stop web scraping is with breach of contract claims. Now, in its case against Bright Data, Twitter’s lawyers filed three claims: breach of contract, tortious interference with a contract, and unjust enrichment. In the end, it was a pyrrhic victory. They don’t need or seek alternative legal theories.
by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy Many characterize the law of copyright preemption of contracts as a circuit split. It’s not that half of federal judges have adopted one clear stance on copyright preemption of contracts and the other half have adopted another clear stance. But fair use isn’t a defense to a breach of contract claim.
This post is part of MoFos 2025 Intersection of AI and Life Sciences blog series. In this blog series, we explore how artificial intelligence is revolutionizing research, innovation, and patient care in the life sciences.
In so doing, they reversed the district court that had previously held that cellular device users’ data allowances under their contracts with cellular service providers did not constitute “property” subject to conversion. As such, to the extent that there is a grievance here, it should be based in contract, not in property.
Because for the first time, a company with knowledge of an online agreement–acting in purported violation of that agreement by scraping–succeeded in defeating a breach of contract claim. The post Facebook Drops Anti-Scraping Lawsuit Against Bright Data (Guest Blog Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
In my project, You Can Play (see also working paper here ), I explore how contract, rather than copyright, is the key enabler of user creativity in this industry. Through standard form UGC policies, the industry has created an almost Creative Commons-style system of user enablement.
Then he reversed course on remand and ruled in favor of LinkedIn on its breach of contract claims. On January 23rd, Judge Chen once again dropped a bombshell for the web-scraping world (and those looking to stop it) by ruling in favor of Bright Data and against Meta on its breach of contract claims at summary judgment. Bright Data Ltd.
But I think this might have more to do with the way the lawyers pleaded this issue rather than the quality of the potential breach of contract claim here. — I’ve only touched on a fraction of the issues in this case, and this blog is already well over 2,000 words. And this case is just beginning. –Doe 1 v.
Another 3k+ word post about the jurisprudential chaos in online contract formation law. Ticketmaster, a 9th Circuit memo opinion from 2020 that I did not blog. But ultimately, the onus is on Disney to create a contract formation process so conspicuous that a court can’t reach decisions like this. Facebook, Inc.,
The Court of Appeal noted that the sellers accepting the extension offer late was a repudiation of the contract, a kind of breach which entitled the seller to choose whether to terminate the APS, or continue with it: the critical requirement is that this choice must be communicated to the repudiating party.
Trade secret and contract claims often travel together. Because of the close relationship between such claims, this Holland & Knight blog post discusses a contract case involving confidentiality, even though trade secrets do not seem to be implicated. By: Holland & Knight LLP
Blog post coverage of that ruling here. “all his claims relate to the suspension of his account and the alleged failure to suspend the third-party user’s account, whether they are styled as breach of contract, tort, or fraud claims…All of Plaintiff’s claims seek to treat Twitter as a publisher.”
In spring 2021, hiQ Labs had its motion to dismiss denied on LinkedIn’s misappropriation, breach of contract, and trespass to chattels claims. Breach of Contract. Additionally, hiQ raised four affirmative defenses to the breach of contract claim: 1) unclean hands, 2) waiver, 3) estoppel, and 4) unconscionability. The opinion.
Further, the MoU also underscores the requirement of separate contracts of music directors and lyricists with producers whereby both will have the right to negotiate independently. practice where one would see singers and actors names being featured prominently and not the composers or the lyricists. As explained by Prof.
As part of the course requirements, students were asked to write a reflective blog on their internship experience. With that said, contracts should be clearly written, without legal jargon, to avoid litigation. Shayna Jan is an IP Intensive student and a 3L JD Candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School.
Even in situations where a business owner contracts a third-party web designer to build their website, both the business and the web designer can be held liable for copyrights violated if they are used on your website. If the use of a copyrighted photo is related to commercial purposes, it is almost certain you have infringed.
For one, it’s a significant case that deals with many of the issues that have arisen in some of the other cases I’ve blogged about on this site, but it’s in Delaware, not in the Northern District of California. Sometimes, when we blog these technology cases, we act as if the law in California is the law everywhere. The post Ryanair v.
Many of my clients have contractors or vendors or virtual assistants who assist them with writing blog posts, creating newsletters, doing social media posting and work. First, contracts. Make sure you have proper contracts. The following is an edited transcript of my video Copyright Concerns When Using Others to Create Content.
Breach of Contract As is common with scraping cases in 2023, just because the scraper prevails on the CFAA claim doesn’t mean the scraper is going to prevail. Doe (Guest Blog Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Also, this is dicta. Defendant created an account to access Chegg’s data.
As I blogged last time: The plaintiff can replead the contract breach claim for failure-to-pay, but the case has lost all of its ideological implications about must-carry obligations and instead has devolved into a routine collections case (that will likely fail anyways). The suit was easily rejected by the court. Alphabet Inc.
The plaintiffs point to the Facebook-Cognizant contract as the source of that duty. The plaintiffs get another chance to plead the fraud claims, so I expect to blog this case at least one more time. Cognizant appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. ” Nor does OSHA. ” Nor does OSHA. June 10, 2022).
My prior blog post. The Ninth Circuit easily dismisses most of it in a breezy memorandum opinion, but the contract claim gets revived for a little longer. In a mild surprise, the panel revives her breach of contract claim. This resurrects Lloyd’s breach of contract claim, but only temporarily. Facebook, Inc.
As noted in our recent blog posts, The Rise of Next-Gen Business Process Outsourcing and Key Contracting Issues to Consider, the core premise of next-gen business process outsourcing (BPO) includes (1) the leveraging of automation, bots, performance tools, and other technology to transform and optimize workflows and business processes and (2) the implementation (..)
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content