This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Threat of Creative Theft Creative theft poses a significant challenge for independent artists, manifesting as the unauthorized appropriation of original works through reposts, remixes, and style imitations on socialmedia platforms. Employ socialmedia monitoring tools that alert you whenever your work appears on other platforms.
The Threat of Creative Theft Creative theft poses a significant challenge for independent artists, manifesting as the unauthorized appropriation of original works through reposts, remixes, and style imitations on socialmedia platforms. Employ socialmedia monitoring tools that alert you whenever your work appears on other platforms.
It’s “burn-down-the-Internet” week on the blog, during which I am recapping three bad California bills that the California legislature is poised to enact. Today, I’m covering AB 2408, a performative “protect kids online” bill that kick kids off socialmedia entirely and ruin the Internet for adults too.
This is a case focusing on ownership of socialmedia accounts. We blogged this case twice before. See “ SocialMedia Ownership Disputes Part II: Bridal Wear Company Takes Back Control of Instagram Account from Ex-Employee ” and “ Another Confused Entry in the SocialMedia Account Ownership Jurisprudence–JLM v. (See
Utah’s Minor Protection in SocialMedia Act contains two major provisions. First, it requires socialmedia companies to conduct age assurance of their users to a 95% accuracy rate, along with an appellate process for misclassified users. Utah argued that the law doesn’t suppress any specific topic.
[Warning: this is a 5,600 word blog post]. There are two critically important cases over “socialmedia addiction” pending in California state court and as an MDL in the federal Northern District of California. Despite the importance of those Fall 2023 rulings, I never blogged either.
The categorization of socialmedia accounts into “business” and “personal” accounts was a hot issue a decade ago, when states across the country passed laws to protect employees from invasive employer demands to access or control their personal socialmedia accounts. See Musk, Elon).
The last time we blogged this case , the district court had sided with JLM, initially restricting Gutman’s use of the socialmedia accounts and then awarding control over the accounts to JLM. What does a 200+ year old fox have to say about who owns socialmedia accounts?). ” (Cite to Pierson v.
” BBC : Facebook’s growth not linked to psychological harm, study finds * Science : How do socialmedia feed algorithms affect attitudes and behavior in an election campaign? Plaintiffs have not submitted the Resort’s pages on third-party travel websites or presented socialmedia posts. Kallinen v.
The opinion holds that the key parts of Florida’s socialmedia censorship law (SB 7072) likely violate the First Amendment and should remain enjoined. ” The opinion also highlights the madness of the Fifth Circuit allowing the Texas socialmedia censorship law to take effect via a 1-line order. “S.B.
June 14, 2024) The post Reusing SocialMedia Photos for Ads? 1 Hotel appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Case Citation : Khachatryan v. 1 Hotel West Hollywood LLC , 2024 WL 3015504 (C.D. Be Careful!–Khachatryan –Khachatryan v.
IP Osgoode would like to congratulate the winners of the Gowling WLG Best Blog in IP Law and Technology Prize for 2020-2021. Four prizes in total are awarded each year to Osgoode students and the winning blog posts are featured in the IPilogue. Best Blog Comment : We did not award a winner for this category.
2, 2022): Nor does personal jurisdiction arise out of the Film Defendants’ so-called “advertising strategy,” which allegedly “featured a significant push on socialmedia[ ] targeting Washington, DC residents via Instagram and Facebook.” targeted socialmedia advertising. “ Privacy. * ” * Williams v.
This case involves augmented reality (AR) effects/”filters” that people can use to doctor up images and videos on socialmedia, such as the ability to add virtual bunny ears, flower crowns, or cat whiskers to people in the image or video. To some privacy lawyers, this is a prima facie violation of BIPA. Martell v.
Best Blog in IP Law and Technology Prize for 2021-2022. Four prizes in total are awarded each year to Osgoode students and the winning blog posts are featured in the IPilogue. Gowling WLG Best Blog in IP Law and Technology Prize? Best Blog: Kwangil (David) Park: What is a Method of Medical Treatment? . Gowling WLG ?Best
Online privacy is, without a doubt, an area of growing concern. The proposal was presented in two parts: a discussion outlining the government’s intent to regulate socialmedia platforms, and a technical paper outlining details of the proposed law. Photo by AbsolutVision ( UNSPLASH ).
July 7, 2020): “The privacy policy includes a section titled “Rights of California Residents,” which addresses requirements of the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), Cal. ” * Bloomberg : Global Privacy Control Popularity Grows as Legal Status Up in Air. Voodoo SAS v. SayGames LLC, 2020 WL 379165 (N.D.
A thorough analysis of the selected EdTech products showed that a vast majority of the government-endorsed online learning platforms risked children’s privacy and violated children’s rights. Part 2 will discuss the HRW report’s recommendations and the initiatives being taken to address the risks that EdTech poses to child privacy.
Privacy has been a reoccurring issue debated across the world as virtual communication is no longer seen as an option but essential to working remotely during a pandemic. Not only does this violate our privacy rights, but it also creates a bigger ethical dilemma within the economic market. Zoom: The 2020 Icon of Remote Work.
Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, academic discussions indicated that artificial intelligence (AI) would signify the fourth industrial revolution with tangible economic benefits and potential privacy concerns. Nowadays, privacy concerns exceed personal information protection. .
Furthermore, the age authentication process would expose both under-18s and adults to extra privacy and security risks. The bill regulates “socialmedia platforms,” defined as an “electronic medium” that allows “users to create, share, and view user?generated What The Bill Says. generated content.”
In August, Apple made headlines by introducing new privacy features in their upcoming software updates. Over the years, Apple has cultivated a strong reputation as a protector of consumer privacy. One of their core values and popular marketing point s is that “privacy is a fundamental human right.”
Parents who share every aspect of their children’s lives on socialmedia often do so with the intention of celebrating their children’s milestones and achievements, but they may not realize the potential consequences of their actions. Reading Time: 3 minutes What is “sharenting”? Get consent.
First, Snapchat may not have had the legal right to snoop into the conversation due to the ECPA and other privacy laws, so there’s no way for Snapchat to tell if the conversation was about helping with homework or sexual grooming. Snap appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. July 7, 2022). The complaint.
Clearview’s AI crawls the internet and can access, download, and store any image uploaded to socialmedia. Many socialmedia companies, including Google, Facebook, and Twitter, have accused Clearview of utilizing user images without authorization. Regulations and Restrictions.
Today I’m blogging about one of those bills, California AB 2408 , “Socialmedia platform: child users: addiction.” This bill assumes that socialmedia platforms are intentionally addicting kids, so it creates business-ending liability to thwart those alleged addictions. What the Bill Says.
The term “link taxes” refer to the government compulsion of large Internet services, such as socialmedia or search engines, to pay news media for indexing and publishing their headlines and links. 4) Socialmedia “defective design” lawsuits go forward. #StopTheSADScheme. Does anyone care?
Our wide-ranging discussion covered how regulators can address the privacy, security and transparency concerns that underlie this transformative technology. By: Pillsbury - Internet & SocialMedia Law Blog Alex Tuzhilin, Julia Glidden and Gerry Petrella.
Defendants also managed the socialmedia presence of the “La Baguette” business, which primarily consisted of a Facebook page. Moore, Find Out Who Your Friends Are: A Framework for Determining Whether Employees’ SocialMedia Followers Follow Them to A New Job, 39 CAMPBELL L. See generally, Christopher A.
This is yet another blog post about 50 Cent a/k/a Curtis Jackson. If he is, either the clinic is violating medical privacy rules or 50 Cent consented to the disclosure, and that consent could potentially extend to the photo. When is a video showing content published on socialmedia an advertisement, and when it is a documentary?
muddies the waters again, challenging orders from privacy authorities in British Columbia and testing current Canadian privacy law. In February 2021, the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (“the Commissioner”) released a report on Clearview AI, Inc. Facial recognition software company Clearview AI, Inc. Accountability. Conclusion.
In a November ruling, a magistrate judge notes that the lawsuit appears to be the first of its kindone in which a socialmedia influencer accuses another influencer of (among other things) copyright infringement based on the similarities between their posts that promote the same products. Sydney Nicole LLC v. Sydney Nicole LLC v.
Comments to the CPPA’s Proposed Regulations Pursuant to the Consumer Privacy Rights Act of 2020, Aug. Comments on the California Consumer Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) Rulemaking , May 2022. How Fair Use Helps Bloggers Publish Their Research , Association of Research Libraries blog, Feb. Blog Posts. . __ (forthcoming 2022).
Value for Users Traditionally, users have valued the ability to share their personal information while using online services, like search engines or socialmedia platforms, citing their desire to receive personalized advertisements. What monetary value do some privacy-conscious users demand to share their personal information? $20
Tinder socialmedia channels.'” Tinder appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. ” IP Exception. In Almeida v. Amazon , “the Eleventh Circuit has expressly established that the right of publicity is an intellectual property right.” ” Cites to UCS v. LEXIS 139670 (S.D.
For example: “If a conflict arises between commercial interests and the best interests of children, companies should prioritize the privacy, safety, and well-being of children over commercial interests.” What are the long-term privacy and security implications of routinized and widespread face scanning?
For trademarks, a good place to start is the company’s marketing and promotional materials, website, mobile app, and socialmedia. Don’t overlook company socialmedia accounts, domain names, and toll-free numbers, which may also serve as potential trademarks. A special note about customer data.
While study of socialmedia and online platform private ordering is a very well-established way to find out how providers deal with copyright, data protection and consumer protection, studies of generative AI T&C have been slower to get going. You can find the full report here.
I’ve blogged three yearbook cases so far this year ( Callahan v. Ancestry ), and today I’ll blog two more. In particular, they are having some success bending Section 230, and this genre offers some interesting considerations for folks paying attention to the privacy/230 borders. Blogging it has been rough!
In my previous post for this blog, (see here ), I discussed an interim order passed by the Delhi HC recognising the petitioner’s Right to be Forgotten (‘RTBF’). A number of arguments were made, drawing from judgments in the EU, the USA, and articles of the GDPR and sections of the PDP Bill.
Music is also a vital component of socialmedia platforms, as research displays that nine out of 10 socialmedia users engage in a music related activity on their apps. Taking heed of the GDPR, in early 2020, California passed the California Consumer Privacy Act ( CCPA ).
He shared this story on socialmedia with the “#airbnbwhileblack” hashtag, which went viral. Directly below the three buttons, it stated: “By signing up, I agree to Airbnb’s Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, Guest Refund Policy, and Host Guarantee Terms.” Airbnb appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
There have been other decisions involving BIPA, NBA 2K, and sometimes AWS that I haven’t comprehensively blogged. This case involves the videogame NBA 2K, not a stranger to this blog. Amazon appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. The court shrugs its shoulders. Amazon Web Services Inc.,
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content