Copyright Lately

MAY 6, 2022

The same rule applies to digital artworks sold as NFTs. Meanwhile, television rights management company IDDH (International Rights and Divers Holding) , the supposed source of Squemme’s IP interests, liquidated all of the assets it had over twenty years ago and looks to have been defunct since 1999. (By

Derivative Work 88

Derivative Work Licensing Artwork Contracts 88

Copyright Lately

AUGUST 25, 2023

Howell ruled last Friday that the Register of Copyrights did not act “arbitrarily or capriciously” in denying a copyright registration to Dr. Stephen Thaler for artwork generated entirely by artificial intelligence. ” Dr. Importantly, however, there will still be no copyright protection in the AI-generated material itself.

Derivative Work 81

Derivative Work Registration Copyright Public Domain 81

Copyright Lately

NOVEMBER 21, 2021

Miramax claims, among other things, that the preparation and sale of these derivative works constitutes copyright infringement because the contractual rights Tarantino reserved in his 1993 agreement with Miramax don’t cover NFTs. The breathless media reports soon followed. The NFT isn’t the image.

Copying 126

Copying Non-Fungible Tokens Contracts Copyright 126

LexBlog IP

APRIL 13, 2022

On November 16, 2021, film and television studio Miramax, LLC (“Miramax”) sued Tarantino and his company Visiona Romantica, Inc. According to Miramax, the creation of the NFTs constituted copyright infringement because they were unauthorized derivative works of Pulp Fiction. [23] 25 – July 2, 2021). at 4 ¶ 22. [21]. at 8 ¶ 33.

Non-Fungible Tokens 52

Non-Fungible Tokens Social Media Contracts Branding 52