IP Tech Blog

JANUARY 4, 2023

The exclusivity of exploitation is key to the success of a limited-edition collectible. If the other opinion becomes the standard, whoever mints the artwork first will be the copyright owner and the artist could be at risk of losing their artwork in NFT form. Is this the same in the US and China? The United States.

IP 109

IP Ownership Non-Fungible Tokens Copyright Law 109

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 4, 2023

The exclusivity of exploitation is key to the success of a limited-edition collectible. If the other opinion becomes the standard, whoever mints the artwork first will be the copyright owner and the artist could be at risk of losing their artwork in NFT form. Is this the same in the US and China? The United States.

IP 52

IP Ownership Non-Fungible Tokens Copyright Law 52

Copyright Lately

MAY 6, 2022

What about editing some NBA Top Shots moments to create a fantasy matchup between Michael Jordan and Steph Curry? It’s the kind of virtual utopia that’s hard to imagine in the world of traditional media because, you know, “rights.” The same rule applies to digital artworks sold as NFTs.

Derivative Work 88

Derivative Work Licensing Artwork Contracts 88

LexBlog IP

APRIL 13, 2022

According to Miramax, the creation of the NFTs constituted copyright infringement because they were unauthorized derivative works of Pulp Fiction. [23] [were] far too narrow for him to unilaterally produce, market, and sell the Pulp Fiction NFTs.” [22]. 53]. * * *.

Non-Fungible Tokens 52

Non-Fungible Tokens Social Media Contracts Branding 52