IP and Legal Filings

OCTOBER 11, 2022

The Copyright law thus in this case brings into play the word “performer”; Section 2(qq) of the said Act through an inclusive definition and illustrates a list of people who can be contemplated under the tag of the performer. Section 13(1) of the Copyright Act speaks about the applicability of protection to: 1.

Personality Rights 52

Personality Rights Artistic Work Trademark Copyright 52

IPilogue

NOVEMBER 17, 2021

These events point to two prevalent issues within the current legal framework: First, that current intellectual property laws do not properly acknowledge collective ownership over shared culture within Indigenous communities and second, whether tattoo designs have the potential to be protected through copyright laws.

Ownership 103

Ownership Intellectual Property Artwork Copyright Law 103

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 19, 2023

In the lower court, the Second Circuit reversed the decision of the District Court and held that the Warhol work was not transformative because it maintained the “essential elements of its source material” and was not “fundamentally different and new.” Each of these cases could significantly impact IP law.

Copyright 52

Copyright Trademark Fair Use Contracts 52

IIPRD

JUNE 13, 2024

And IPR serves to protect the creations of the human intellect, encompassing inventions, literary and artistic works, designs, symbols, as well as names and images utilized in commercial endeavors. Another question regarding AI-generated copyright work in India is, whether AI should be given ownership of the work or not.

Intellectual Property 59

Intellectual Property Inventor Invention Trademark 59

IP and Legal Filings

MARCH 28, 2024

1] The Copyright Act protects certain types of works, which are included in Section 13. 13 (1) states that original literary, dramatic, musical, and artistic works as well as cinematograph films and sound recordings are protected by copyright. 1] Bharat Vasani & Jasmine Latkar, What’s in a Name?,

Cinema 83

Cinema Copyright Blogging Registration 83

IIPRD

JUNE 14, 2021

The article attempts to conclude that the fashion business is an IP-intensive industry, constantly producing and industrially misusing inventive thoughts and advancement. Protection under the Copyright Act, 1957. Piracy and Fashion Design. In Rajesh Masrani v. Tahiliani Design Pvt.

Intellectual Property 40

Intellectual Property Artistic Work Designs Design 40

IIPRD

JUNE 8, 2024

The present structure that governs the industry is called “low-IP equanimity,” and it offers designers low protection [5]. However, the protection of fashion designs by trademark law is not perfected. Ltd [6] , Mr. Masrani, the defendant, plagiarized the design and artistic work of Mr. Tarun, the plaintiff.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Designs Design Branding 52