This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This is a case focusing on ownership of socialmedia accounts. See “ SocialMedia Ownership Disputes Part II: Bridal Wear Company Takes Back Control of Instagram Account from Ex-Employee ” and “ Another Confused Entry in the SocialMedia Account Ownership Jurisprudence–JLM v. (See The court also found “Ms.
There are two critically important cases over “socialmedia addiction” pending in California state court and as an MDL in the federal Northern District of California. It is an all-out brawl in federal court, with no-expense-spared battles over each and every picayune litigation issue.
The Texas socialmedia censorship law remains temporarily enjoined by the Fifth Circuit pending Supreme Court review, but Davis couldn’t wait. Davis claimed that Texas’ socialmedia censorship law preempted the TOS venue clause. [FN: That was presumably the number when the complaint was filed. July 26, 2023).
The opinion holds that the key parts of Florida’s socialmedia censorship law (SB 7072) likely violate the First Amendment and should remain enjoined. ” The opinion also highlights the madness of the Fifth Circuit allowing the Texas socialmedia censorship law to take effect via a 1-line order. “S.B.
Michael Christin, another trial attorney at the DoJ, went into great detail on the Jetflix case, discussing various challenges his team faced while litigating the case. ” Marissa Bostick, Head of Global Litigation at the Motion Picture Association (MPA) , also sees a combination of increased professionalism and brazenness.
creators whose creative works were featured in Facebook advertisements without permission. Much of the language was written well before widespread adoption of socialmedia, and much of that language was vague even then. The lawsuit is proposed as a class action, including all U.S. They estimate that class to be in the thousands.
Negative exposure in the media has direct implications for image and branding. Additional risk of polluting or even displacing otherwise positive articles, could jeopardize what amounts to free advertising worth millions of dollars. I write to remind you of your duty to preserve such evidence.
Earlier this year, the Texas legislature enacted HB 20 , a blatant attempt to censor socialmedia service. The opinion emphatically slices through the FUD that’s been generated by pro-censorial forces questioning whether socialmedia services exercise editorial discretion. The Opinion. ” [cite to USTA v.
Court strikes down Maryland’s Digital Advertising Tax Act on First Amendment, Dormant Commerce Clause, and other grounds (including the Internet Tax Freedom Act). But Facebook clearly explained the differences between the charging practices to advertisers, who had the general option to choose under which system they would be billed.
Atari’s copyright infringement lawsuit against State Farm advances, underscoring the importance of careful clearance in advertising. In addition to copyright infringement, Atari brought claims for business disparagement, false information and advertising, unfair competition, and unjust enrichment.
My roundup of the top Internet Law developments of 2023: 10) California court bans targeted advertising (?). Regulators have sought to suppress online targeted advertising for years, with only minimal success. In turn, advertisers have fled Twitter. 4) Socialmedia “defective design” lawsuits go forward.
If the case stands on appeal, Twitter will write a check to CCDH to compensate it for the litigation harms Twitter has imposed on it. These reports allegedly caused advertisers to pause their Twitter advertising campaigns, starving Twitter of much-needed revenues. to lose significant advertising revenues.”
Rule 40 restricts socialmedia posts and advertisements published by athletes and sponsors during the Games, both in volume and content. As socialmedia posts generate buzz and draw fans, spectators will have a chance to enjoy getting behind-the-scenes looks and instant updates from their favourite athletes.
Trademark infringement has grown more complex and pervasive, ranging from counterfeit goods to digital squatting and keyword advertising. For trademark owners, litigation was their main option. also, Misuse of socialmedia involves using trademarks without authorization to mislead or damage companies.
For attorneys frequently engaged in copyright infringement litigation, drilling down into the specifics of the four fair use defense factors set forth in 17 U.S.C. § But the existence of commercialism and website advertisements is not, and should not be, a death knell for a successful fair use defense. 107 is common practice.
12, 2023) Following a large verdict for Monster on false advertising claims, this opinion discusses extensively the requirements for injunctive relief in false advertising cases. The jury awarded $271,924,174 for damages sustained by Defendants’ false advertising and found that the false advertising was willful and deliberate. “As
I’m only going to discuss the false advertising aspects. There is an ongoing, separate litigation about ownership of the relevant patent; plaintiffs alleged that the two inventors assigned the patent to plaintiff Orthex.
But by providing a foil in litigation against both the Center for Countering Digital Hate (“CCDH”) and Bright Data (the world’s largest seller of scraped data), he’s given judges in the most important district court in the country for tech legal issues, the Northern District of California, plenty of motivation to rule against him.
Creager sells Montana post drivers (made in China) that compete with the Texas post drivers sold by IDT (advertised as made in the USA). LJD therefore reduced the amount of business it conducted with Creager until it could determine how the litigation between Creager and IDT was resolved.
For attorneys frequently engaged in copyright infringement litigation, drilling down into the specifics of the four fair use defense factors set forth in 17 U.S.C. § ” But the existence of commercialism and website advertisements is not, and should not be, a death knell for a successful fair use defense.
14, 2022) Once in a blue moon, a false advertising-based antitrust claim survives a motion to dismiss in a circuit that imposes a list of excessive requirements on such claims. Consumers and advertisers adequately alleged that Facebook has monopoly power in social network/socialmedia (consumers) and socialadvertising markets.
2021 has seen the emergence of a litigation genre against “yearbook” database vendors that publish old yearbooks online. I’m keeping my fingers crossed this anomaly gets fixed somewhere in this litigation. I’ve blogged three yearbook cases so far this year ( Callahan v. Ancestry , Knapke v. Section 230.
In re: Elysium Health-ChromaDex Litigation, No. Was this commercial advertising or promotion? Elysium argued that the website as a whole was a referral website for Tru Niagen, which advertised Tru Niagen at the top of every page. Thus, any false advertising claim would lie against Albaum, not [directly] against ChromaDex.
22, 2021) This case should be of interest to people working on contextual advertising. Rolling Stone litigation, though the facts are more internet-oriented. Common sense tells us that this is not a simple advertisement.” “It It is a work of fashion journalism that, like every fashion magazine, happens to contain advertisements.”
30, 2024) (R&R) Recommendation: Dastar should block Qingdao’s Lanham Act false advertising counterclaims based on Lashify’s claim to be the originator of lash technology, but false patent marking counterclaims should survive. However, the Noerr-Pennington doctrine didn’t apply to this case at this stage of the litigation.
6th Edition of Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases and Materials (with Rebecca Tushnet). Regulation of Political Advertising (2022 Edition). Regulation of Housing Advertising (2022 Edition). Will California Clone-and-Revise Some Terrible Ideas from Florida/Texas’ SocialMedia Censorship Laws? Attorney General.
Advertising can take many forms, including statements about a company’s products on websites and socialmedia platforms. In this 60-minute webinar, designed exclusively for in-house counsel, you will learn how you can protect your company against legal challenges based on its advertising practices.
That legal standard could devastate socialmedia usage in Australia. It increases the risk that ordinary socialmedia users could be liable for defamation caused by their so-called friends. That risk encourages socialmedia users to actively police the comments of their friends–or stop posting entirely.
A couple of specifics: The false advertising claims don’t escape 230: “Had those third-party users refrained from posting harmful content, Plaintiffs’ claims that Defendants falsely advertised and misrepresented their applications’ safety would not be cognizable.” ICS Provider. ” Publisher/Speaker Claims.
My brief explains how Section 230’s procedural benefits are critical to Section 230’s efficacy, and why turning more cases into Constitutional litigation will have numerous negative effects. How would the web and socialmedia change? What might the court get wrong in this case?
Anyway, Bell goes around suing unauthorized users of the passage, mostly public schools or nonprofits that publish the passage on socialmedia. Anyway, the complaint alleged that widespread use of the passage on socialmedia could reduce “the incentive to purchase Winning Isn’t Normal or related merchandise.”
Bell did argue that he licenses the passage on a standalone basis, but “Bell is unable to allege that anyone has ever purchased a license before posting the WIN Passage on socialmedia—much less a public school district, which has no commercial interest in its online presence.” Implications.
On the first, substantial litigation has already been launched concerning whether the data used to train these models requires payment or opt-in from creatives whose work has been ingested, often without consent. Two key issues have generated much argument, relating respectively to the inputs to and outputs from large models.
3, 2022) Plaintiffs alleged that they employed the individual defendants in part to manage socialmediaadvertising and promotion for plaintiffs’ baking businesses, aka La Baguette. The law on the ownership of a socialmedia pages created by employees for employers is evolving rapidly and varies between jurisdictions.
For trademarks, a good place to start is the company’s marketing and promotional materials, website, mobile app, and socialmedia. Don’t overlook company socialmedia accounts, domain names, and toll-free numbers, which may also serve as potential trademarks.
The Barcelona Appeal Court recently weighed in on the question in the latest stage of the multi-year litigation between PDO “Champagne” and a Spanish tapas bar “Champanillo” (case SAP B 2691/2022 ). When does a third-party sign unlawfully evoke the denomination “Champagne” ? The Barcelona Commercial Court dismissed the action.
Cod § 17200, for failing to provide sufficient details regarding ad rejections in violation of the Advertising Policies. The court says Section 230 doesn’t apply to Shared’s other claims, which the court says arise “out of promises that Plaintiff argues Defendant made to its advertising partners.” & Prof.
To compensate those organizations for the articles they post would create an odd dynamic where they could effectively guarantee payment through their own socialmedia posts. First, there have been numerous deals in Canada, including with members of News Media Canada. This creates harms several ways.
These questions are being addressed (in mostly unsatisfactory ways) in litigation involving hiQ and BrandTotal. BrandTotal “provides advertising consulting services to corporate clients regarding how those clients’ and their competitors’ digital advertisements are presented to socialmedia users.”
Perhaps because the litigation seems to have been otherwise painful, the court actually gave some attention to the harm story and found that BIT LLC failed to allege that it had standing to bring its trademark claims. Its complaint makes no mention of any specific advertising by these two parties whatsoever.
“This damages award is a fraction of what it could be if this case were litigated and the full scope of Defendants’ infringement revealed,” the publishers note. Since this amount represents just a small subset of all infringements, the request is reasonable, the publishers note.
Here, producing and giving away promotional cups at the Crankworkx mountain biking festival and promoting the same on socialmedia went above and beyond what would normally be expected of a tire manufacturer by promoting the racing event for the racing event’s benefit.
” The term “websites-generated message and functions” is gibberish, but the court amplifies: “Immunizing a website’s own targeted advertisements and algorithms does not advance a website’s internal policing of indecent content or promoting third-party speech.” ” This is insane, amirite?
In addition, advertising companies and payment processors help to cut off revenue to pirate sites and services, when appropriate. “We will also pursue litigation, where it is known to be effective in reducing piracy and increasing legitimate consumption of content,” Van Voorn concludes. all over the globe. .
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content