This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Statutory damages/attorneys’ fees: Five 18 argued that Wolf didn’t register any of the named copyrights within three months of publication, and that the alleged infringements of the copyrights predated the effective dates of registration. But what about falseadvertising? Dastar barred a passing off claim.
ZimVie intervened and counterclaimed for declaratory judgment of invalidity, cancellation fo the color marks registration, declaratory judgment of noninfringement, falseadvertising under the Lanham Act and California law, and tortious interference. ZimVie responded that the commercial speech exception applied.
Boston Suburban allegedly continued to use the “Logan Car Service” mark in online keyword advertising and in metatags, and continued to copy customer reviews from Boston Carriage’s website and publish them on online review platforms. The actionable alleged misrepresentation is that defendant performed the relevant services.
Skillz sued its competitor Papaya, alleging falseadvertising under federal and state law. That is, falseadvertising was sufficiently pled as to statements that games on Skillzs platforms did not use bots, matched players evenly, and allowed users to withdraw funds at any time. Skillz Platform Inc. Papaya Gaming, Ltd.,
Certified alleged Lanham Act falseadvertising based on allegations that the Clorox defendants and Avicenna engaged in a scheme to falselyadvertise the source of chicken collagen used in dietary supplements sold to retail consumers. They advertised that CJC contains 2,400 mg of sternal collagen among other ingredients.
It advertised “This device was one of the most popular items on a popular 3D printing website with over 20,000 unique downloads” on its website, at a time when Leszczynski’s Thingiverse page displayed that his Cube had been downloaded 20,000 times. Falseadvertising: Only ok against Kitchen Cube.
Amazon’s Brand Registry advertises “Automated Protections” that are “[p]owered by Amazon’s Machine Learning.” Falseadvertising, Lei defendants: The complaint didn’t explain how “designed in the United States but … manufactured in China” was materially deceptive and thus didn’t meet FRCP 9(b) pleading standards.
It has trademark registrations for the word mark “NEO4J.” Perplexingly, the court also suggested that in comparative advertising defendants would be bound by Neo4j’s trademark guidelines, which does not seem exactly right unless those guidelines happen to reproduce the law (perhaps they do). False designation of origin: Yep.
Entrepreneur has 15 federal registrations that include the word “entrepreneur.” Entrepreneur’s desire to bring forth a claim for falseadvertising against a competitor in a similar market is not unusual behavior.” So the motion to add a falseadvertising claim was denied without prejudice.
Unsurprisingly, the trademark claims survive a motion to dismiss, but associated falseadvertising claims don’t. VFB owns several trademark registrations including “Vampire,” specifically for wine and pre-mixed alcoholic beverages other than beer, and “Vampyre,” specifically for spirits.
In August 2020, Krikor discovered that Sports Mall had posted at least six of her photographs on its website and advertised the depicted items for sale on its site…. This alleged chutzpah triggered the falseadvertising element of the case. “[T]he Falseadvertising under the Lanham Act: The court identified two theories. (1)
The advertising bit: Defendants allegedly misled New York customers into “believing that unfinished frames and receivers are legal workarounds to New York’s gun control laws, as well as federal law.” came in the midst of other advertising language, such as “Various colors available,” and “no RED TAPE. It was not. NO Registering.
R]eferences to classroom locations and physical attendance requirements in Columbia’s syllabi, departmental policies and handbooks, and course registration portal … merely memorialize the pre-pandemic practice; they offered no guarantee that it would continue indefinitely.”
This case hit my alerts because of its discussion about keyword advertising, but first, I have to digest how the court got there. ” But the trademark registration was over 5 years old, so it had become “incontestable.” ” That prompted this litigation. ” The right answer should be “no one.”
Creager sells Montana post drivers (made in China) that compete with the Texas post drivers sold by IDT (advertised as made in the USA). IDT created an ad for its products using two images of Montana post drivers for which Creager later obtained a copyright registration. There’s more, including public disputes on Craigslist.
And the number of active trademark registrations in the USPTO database is larger than ever. Additionally, since late December 2021, when new procedures went into effect, the USPTO has received around 100 expungement petitions and about 100 re-examination petitions to get rid of registrations for marks that are allegedly not in use.
Fraud [not, apparently, pled as fraud on the PTO but argued that way]: “Fraud in procuring a mark occurs when an applicant knowingly makes false, material representations of fact in connection with an application.” “[T]he burden of proving that a party fraudulently procured a trademark registration is heavy.”
This is a competitive keyword advertising lawsuit. The plaintiff has a trademark registration for the “Nursing CE Central” mark for providing continuing education for nurses. This is fine, but it deviates from courts’ efforts over the years to come up with multi-factor variations specific to keyword advertising.
The court denies a preliminary injunction on the trademark claims based on lack of likely success on the merits, but declines to dismiss either infringement or falseadvertising claims. Marketing channels: “Merely showing that both businesses advertise on the internet is insufficient to show marketing channel convergence.”
PNC sued for counterfeiting, infringement, and falseadvertising/unfair competition under federal and Pennsylvania law. A consumer complaint cited by PNC might be relevant to falseadvertising, but didn’t obviously show trademark confusion: Venmo says they have lost connection with my bank – sounds like Venmo’s problem.
Read literally, all advertising “allow[s] for arranging the sale or purchase of goods,” so this law potentially obligates EVERY ad-supported publisher to undertake the content moderation obligations the bill imposes on online marketplaces. ” [Does this create an affirmative obligation to include images?
The Lanham Act provides for a national system of trademark registration and creates federal causes of action for trademark infringement, trademark dilution, falseadvertising, and cybersquatting. 1051 et seq. By: McAfee & Taft
The court found aspects of the copyright/§1202 claims claim insufficiently specifically pled and granted leave to amend, including to add sufficient detail to establish that the works at issue were not US works and thus exempt from the pre-suit registration requirement.
1114(1) , unfair competition , use of false designations of origin and falseadvertising under 15 U.S.C. Court documents show that Banjo has received a Trademark registration ( No. also known as TerreMax ) for Trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C. Continue reading
CC has a recent trademark registration for a design mark “consist[ing] of the stylized wording ‘COLOR COPPER.COM”, [with] a diamond shape between the wording ‘COLOR’ and ‘COPPER’ made up of four smaller diamonds, each diamond having a pattern inside of it,” COPPER.COM disclaimed. There’s a similar copyright registration for this site.
Trademark Registration No. ABI claims it has attained significant goodwill throughout the United States and the world and that Defendants alleged misleading and falseadvertisements have caused irreparable damage to ABI’s reputation.
But Industria does not advertise or sell its Zenú or Ranchera products in the United States and there are no market surveys specific to the United States for Zenú or Ranchera. Advertisements made for Latinfood Zenú products used the phrase “una deliciosa tradición,” which translates to “a delicious tradition.”
Krbl Limited was alleged infringement and passing off of the plaintiff’s trademark registrations for marks that include the word ‘Royal’, by the defendant’s mark ‘Zabreen Royal’ (‘Impugned Mark’). Responding in the affirmative, the Calcutta High Court has swung the interpretative pendulum back in favor of GUIs being registrable.
24, 2022) This seems like a silly result to me, shifting the burden to comparative advertisers, but it's often much harder to get summary judgment in a trademark case than in comparable cases. PennEngineering claims a PEM family of marks and sued Peninsula for trademark infringement, counterfeiting, falseadvertising, and unfair competition.
Further details, including the link for registration, are provided in the post here. The deadline for registration for the webinar is September 20, 2021. The deadline for registration for the webinar is September 20, 2021. Further details, including the link for registration, are provided in the post here.
Wakefern operates approximately 353 supermarkets under various brands such as ShopRite and Fairway Market across several states, and has a registration for ShopRite. Falseadvertising: Not commercial advertising or promotion. Trademark infringement: This just wasn’t use in commerce.
for trademark infringement, falseadvertising and patent infringement. BTL Industries holds several trademarks related to its products, including the EMSCULPT trademark under USPTO Registration No. Indianapolis, Indiana –The Plaintiff, BTL Industries, Inc. filed suit against Plaintiff JV Medical Supplies, Inc.
But Paul Mitchell, they allege, once imported those products into China and registered them with the Chinese government—at a time when Chinese law required that companies test cosmetic imports on animals as a condition of registration. And, according to the complaint, Paul Mitchell was not exempt from that requirement.
were valid and infringed, but the latter wasn’t counterfeited; SMRI’s dilution victory was vacated, but not its victories on deceptive trade practices, ACPA, falseadvertising, and unfair competition. The Composite Design Mark registration specifically acknowledged that it made “no claim. apart from the mark as shown.”
But the claim still failed for failure to plead registration of those photos, though again there was leave to amend. Lanham Act falseadvertising: The theory was that Meta misrepresented “the creation and ownership” of Logan’s photos. 3d 1137 (9th Cir.
The hypothesis for the study was whether, if the applications for registration of goods contained “green signs” applied to them, they were indicators of the brand being driven by the ideas of sustainability or environmental consciousness. The hypothesis was confirmed, hence popularising the concept of eco-marks among the business giants.
21, 2023) In two opinions on the same day, the court dealt with various IP/falseadvertising claims brought by one litter box seller against another. It has registrations for the word marks “Litter-Robot,” “Litter-Robot 3,” “Litter-Robot 3 Connect,” and “Litter-Robot Pinch Detect.” Automated Pet Care Prods., Purlife Brands, Inc.,
22, 2023) Plaintiffs own Roberto Clemente’s IP rights and a registration for ROBERTO CLEMENTE for “figurines, statues and statuettes made of non-precious metal; beer cans made of non-precious metal sold empty.” (The The district court doesn’t appear to care about what the registration is for; I had to look it up.)
The claim for cancellation of the ‘675 Mark was based on fraud in obtaining the trademark registration and misrepresentation of source, whereas their claim for cancellation of the ’549 and ’077 Marks was based on misrepresentation of source alone. Chunma USA, Inc., 2021 WL 1534988, No. 20-CV-0271 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y.
WPI counterclaimed against Restellini and third-party Institut Restellini SAS – Documentation Centre alleging copyright infringement and falseadvertising. Cases about falseadvertising of the source of “services” were inapposite. “[T]he This opinion got rid of the counterclaims. “In
.” Specifically, Disney owns a federal trademark registration for an iconic video clip from the “Steamboat Willie” film, which is used in connection with certain Disney motion pictures. They should closely consider whether these proposed uses present trademark and falseadvertising risks.
Mandabach sued under §43(a) and coordinate state law claims and sought cancellation of a trademark registration. Falseadvertising/passing off: Same basic problems. Defendants allegedly sold three alcoholic beverages under the name “Peaky Blinder” and used quotations/sayings/phrases from the show.
Core-Brace alleged both falseadvertising and false association from the statements in the design manual and related documents. Plaintiffs did better on aspects of their Utah Truth in Advertising Act (UTAA) claims that did not require showing likely confusion. (Is Summary judgment for defendants. So it could go to trial.
MaddenCo owns Copyright Registration Number TX0009171151 entitled “The Tire Dealer System” with an effective registration date of August 26, 2022. Per Plaintiff’s website, MaddenCo is a privately held family business and has been for over 40 years. According to the complaint, both Defendants Reed and Darby were employed by MaddenCo.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content