Remove Advertising Remove False Advertising Remove Publishing Remove Social Media
article thumbnail

Intellectual Property Rights for Social Media Influencers

IIPRD

A Social Media Influencer is someone who creates unique material that keeps people interested on multiple social media platforms, causing them to return for more high-quality information. One of the most significant methods to safeguard material on social media is through copyright. Make intangible assets.

article thumbnail

YouTube videos aren't commercial advertising/promotion even if some commercial info is in channel bio

43(B)log

29, 2023) “This action arises out of a series of interviews published on YouTube and conducted by Cornelia that plaintiffs perceive as defamatory.” Cornelia also has a YouTube channel with approximately 150,000 subscribers, publishing videos on investing, business, and fitness that have received over 13.8 Wealthy, Inc. million views.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Trademark law and LinkedIn resumes: watch out?

43(B)log

Portkey sued for unfair competition/reverse passing off, false advertising, and trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, as well as related state-law claims. Where there is no allegation of a comparative advertisement, §43(a)(1)(B) requires “some affirmative indication of actual injury and causation.”

article thumbnail

Text of Complaint in X Corp v. Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) in CD Cal, regarding not-for-profit’s reports on Twitter disinformation policies

LexBlog IP

The Center for Countering Digital Hate is a not for profit organization that publishes reports on among other things, hate speech and disinformation on social media. For example, it alleges that 12 posters are responsible for two thirds of the anti-vax content on social media. Are the reports advertisements?

article thumbnail

influencers aren't advertisers' agents, materiality can be common sense, & more in supplement case

43(B)log

Was this commercial advertising or promotion? Elysium argued that the website as a whole was a referral website for Tru Niagen, which advertised Tru Niagen at the top of every page. Thus, any false advertising claim would lie against Albaum, not [directly] against ChromaDex. You can find out more here: [link].

article thumbnail

Drake and 21 Savage May Have More (Legal) Issues Than Vogue

IPilogue

Vogue’s publishers have sued rappers Drake and 21 Savage for unauthorized use of Vogue’s trademarks and false representations in marketing their newest album, “Her Loss”. Katie Graham is an IPilogue Writer and a 2L JD Candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School.

article thumbnail

Section 230 Protects Services That Permit Anonymous Third-Party Posts–Bride v. Snap

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Publisher/Speaker Claims. A couple of specifics: The false advertising claims don’t escape 230: “Had those third-party users refrained from posting harmful content, Plaintiffs’ claims that Defendants falsely advertised and misrepresented their applications’ safety would not be cognizable.”