Remove Advertising Remove False Advertising Remove Presentation Remove Registering Trademarks
article thumbnail

IIC decision also says some things about false advertising: materiality may not be presumed from literal falsity

43(B)log

I won’t say much about that, though I do have a big question, but there are also false advertising aspects of the case. Plaintiffs’ registered trademarks include “SLEEP NUMBER”, “WHAT’S YOUR SLEEP NUMBER”, “SELECT COMFORT”, and “COMFORTAIRE.” Baxter; 996 F.3d 3d 925 (8 th Cir.

article thumbnail

truthful statement about role in developing product isn't falsified by later split

43(B)log

Hawrych’s name, likeness, and trademark (‘Hawrych MD’) in various advertisements.” It was not enough to allege that the marketing materials were “misleading as to his present involvement.” Thus, the false advertising claim would be dismissed. The allegations related to the use of “M.D.” Hawrych” and “Dr.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Imputing Bad Faith in Trademark Infringement Disputes: Analysing DHC Nova v. Novya Judgement

SpicyIP

Facts of the Case In this case, the Plaintiff, an incorporated company engaged in the manufacturing of dairy products under the trademark ‘NOVA,’ filed a suit against the Defendants for infringement and passing off of their registered trademark.

article thumbnail

Italy's #1 Brand of Pasta plausibly communicates geographic origin despite Barilla's argument it's just a TM

43(B)log

17, 2022) Along with the headline-worthy nature of the claim (“ITALY’S #1 BRAND OF PASTA” plausibly falsely communicates Italian origin), the decision contains an extended discussion of judicial notice on a motion to dismiss v. incorporation of documents into the complaint by reference, both often significant in false advertising cases.

article thumbnail

Intellectual Property Rights for Social Media Influencers

IIPRD

The Bombay High Court noted two major difficulties in the landmark decision Marico Limited versus Abhijeet Bhansali : The court ruled that the defendant (a YouTube.com video producer) cannot disclose deceptive material to degrade the plaintiff’s goods while claiming to be teaching or presenting the truth to the public.

article thumbnail

Cardozo A&ELJ symposium, Trademark

43(B)log

Indeed, in recent years the Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized the multiple benefits of registration to a trademark claimant, including in the recent cases of Matal v. I’ve left out the parts specific to registered trademarks and the reference to treaties. Tam and Brunetti, striking down various bars on registration.

article thumbnail

5th Circuit holds that inquiries weigh less than lost sales but can still be evidence of actual confusion

43(B)log

Here, I think we might be starting to see what a post-Abitron, post-JDI world could look like: courts may begin to reestablish distinctions between registered trademarks and unregistered matter protected by unfair competition law, based this time on statutory interpretation rather than conceptual categories.