Remove Advertising Remove False Advertising Remove Litigation Remove Reporting
article thumbnail

Press release touting preliminary injunction can found false advertising counterclaims

43(B)log

ZimVie intervened and counterclaimed for declaratory judgment of invalidity, cancellation fo the color marks registration, declaratory judgment of noninfringement, false advertising under the Lanham Act and California law, and tortious interference. ZimVie responded that the commercial speech exception applied.

article thumbnail

Lexmark allows direct and contributory false advertising claims against certifier

43(B)log

The stamps thus allegedly operate as powerful advertising, allowing Brazilian plywood companies to market their products as conforming to an important American safety standard. As for the contributory false advertising claim, it too was well pled. These stamps are thus unquestionably statements of the Defendants.”

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

two opinions send "false advertising of certification mark" claim to jury

43(B)log

The plaintiffs alleged that the stamps themselves were “a powerful form of advertising because they allow the Brazilian plywood companies to market their products as conforming to an important American safety standard.” pictures of not-good plywood from case Plaintiffs alleged both direct and contributory false advertising.

article thumbnail

accusing someone of patent infringement can be actionable disparagement if you know the patent's invalid

43(B)log

Before it prevailed in the underlying patent litigation, Cap Export alleged that defendants disparaged Cap Export and its products as an infringer/infringing. The underlying patent litigation allegedly fraudulently induced Cap Export to enter into a $1.1 and to Amazon. Given the alleged bad faith, this sufficed.

article thumbnail

false advertising claim fails, in part because of stringent antitrust rules

43(B)log

In re EpiPen (Epinephrine Injection, USP) Marketing, Sales Practices & Antitrust Litig., 17, 2020) A lot of stuff here; I will ignore the non-false advertising related aspects of this mostly antitrust case. Sanofi argued that none of its advertisements or promotional materials made any of these assertions.

article thumbnail

using competitor's images in comparative advertising is fair use even when appearance isn't being compared

43(B)log

Creager sells Montana post drivers (made in China) that compete with the Texas post drivers sold by IDT (advertised as made in the USA). The parties had other disputes, including accusing each other of posting false reviews of the other. The parties compete in the market for skid steer attachments and other products.

article thumbnail

Earnings calls, recall notices not "commercial advertising or promotion," but could be "of and concerning" largest market player

43(B)log

It alleged that the Philips defendants, who make such devices, engaged in false advertising about one of SoClean’s devices in order to deflect blame for the Philips devices’ design defects. Commercial advertising or promotion: A separate problem. In re SoClean, Inc., Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liab. 22-542 (W.D.