This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Victory operates as Brough Brothers, which claims it was the first African American owned bourbon distillery in the Commonwealth of Kentucky, with the requisite licenses to operate a distillery by September 2020. The statements at issue didnt claim to have a distillers license and permit.
In summer 2020, AHBP began negotiating with the Lynd defendants for the exclusive license to market and sell a surface disinfectant/cleaner known as “Bioprotect 500” in Argentina. Lynd advertised the Product as effective against the coronavirus. the Lanham Act falseadvertising claim survived.
14, 2021) Dawgs alleged that Crocs falsely marketed its shoes in violation of the Lanham Act by advertising Croslite, the foam material that Crocs shoes are made from, as “patented,” “proprietary,” and “exclusive.” Effervescent, Inc., 2021 WL 4170997, No. 06-cv-00605-PAB-KMT, No. 16-cv-02004-PAB-KMT (D.
ZimVie intervened and counterclaimed for declaratory judgment of invalidity, cancellation fo the color marks registration, declaratory judgment of noninfringement, falseadvertising under the Lanham Act and California law, and tortious interference. ZimVie responded that the commercial speech exception applied.
Here, plaintiffs alleged that TFL and Nelson had actual knowledge: they knew how the fraudulent scheme worked, that they were shipping products sold using deceptive and unfair advertising, that the ads and websites were false and misleading, and the nature of the tortious conduct being committed by Beyond Global and Doe defendants.
The Cube file was provided under a Creative Commons, non-commercial, no derivatives license. It advertised “This device was one of the most popular items on a popular 3D printing website with over 20,000 unique downloads” on its website, at a time when Leszczynski’s Thingiverse page displayed that his Cube had been downloaded 20,000 times.
2, 2021) Rex sued Zillow and the National Association of Realtors for antitrust and falseadvertising violations. Surprisingly, the antitrust claims survive, as do falseadvertising claims agains Zillow. Lanham Act claim: Was this commercial advertising or promotion? C21-312 TSZ, 2021 WL 3930694 (W.D.
Boston Suburban allegedly continued to use the “Logan Car Service” mark in online keyword advertising and in metatags, and continued to copy customer reviews from Boston Carriage’s website and publish them on online review platforms. And RICO claims failed because they were RICO claims.
The statements were “commercial advertising meant to sell a product, and generally there ‘can be no constitutional objection to the suppression of commercial messages that do not accurately inform the public.’” The First Amendment has long coexisted with no-fault falseadvertising laws. The California Supreme Court reversed.
The stamps thus allegedly operate as powerful advertising, allowing Brazilian plywood companies to market their products as conforming to an important American safety standard. In doing so, the licensing board is making a powerful statement—some would say, the most important statement—about the doctors’ qualifications.”
2, 2022) The court of appeals upholds the rejection of ThermoLife’s falseadvertising claims (Lanham Act and Florida’s FDUTPA) on statutory standing grounds. It sells compounds/licenses its technology for use in sports nutrition supplements, while BPI produces its own dietary supplements.
The plaintiffs alleged that the stamps themselves were “a powerful form of advertising because they allow the Brazilian plywood companies to market their products as conforming to an important American safety standard.” pictures of not-good plywood from case Plaintiffs alleged both direct and contributory falseadvertising.
Neo4j Enterprise Edition was originally offered under both a paid-for commercial license and the free GNU Affero General Public License, version 3, but Neo4j then replaced that AGPL with a stricter license (the Sweden license), which prohibited the non-paying public from engaging in commercial resale and certain commercial support services.
Defendants allegedly copied key components of Trackman’s copyrighted software and falsely suggested, in promotions and advertisements, that defendants were authorized to use the well-known courses in their game. Although the court dismissed a contract claim, copyright and falseadvertising claims survived.
25, 2022) I know it probably seems sometimes like I approve of every expansive use of falseadvertising law, but sometimes even I find an aggressive position to go too far. De Simone then split from VSL, which eventually lost the license for the De Simone Formulation and attempted to reverse engineer it/replace it.
30, 2025) This is a ruling on 19 motions to exclude expert testimony in this case, which is mostly an antitrust case; I will focus only on some falseadvertising-relevant rulings. brewer works only with Keurig brand or licensed pods) but some did not (e.g., I prefer the taste of Keurig or Keurig-licensed brands.).
I]ts primary funding source is the sale and licensing of publications containing its copyrighted works.” UpCodes, Inc., 2021 WL 1236106, Nos. 6261 (VM) & 20 Civ. 4316 (VM) (S.D.N.Y. It sells I-Codes and Custom Codes through its online store, along with access to additional features through its premiumACCESS tool. “[I]ts
Unlike purchasing physical content from a store that a consumer can hold on to forever, the suit alleges that Apple’s license to the content expires and therefore the consumer’s right to own the content also expires. For one, New York’s falseadvertising law provide potential damages of $500 per instance of falseadvertising.
.” Unlike purchasing physical content from a store that a consumer can hold on to forever, the suit alleges that Apple’s license to the content expires and therefore the consumer’s right to own the content also expires. The suit could have major implications for Apple, as well as other streamers using similar terminology.
million consent judgment, which defendants touted in a press release and advertised on Zinus’s website even after the court vacated the stipulated judgment. Courts have generally harmonized the Lanham Act with the Patent Act by requiring bad faith before claims about patent infringement can constitute falseadvertising.
Defendants who had federal firearms licenses had access to, but did not use, the National Instant Criminal Background Check System before selling unfinished frames and receivers to New York consumers, while some defendants weren’t licensed to sell firearms at all. It was not. NO Registering. No Transfer fees. Ships right to your door.”
Shingle Savers counterclaimed, alleging, among other things, falseadvertising under the Lanham Act and violation of the Ohio Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Lanham Act/ODTPA claims: First, the court declined to hold that Rule 9(b) applied to Lanham Act falseadvertising claims, which don’t require fraud.
15, 2024) This putative class action alleged that Amazon overcharged and “[d]eceived consumers by misrepresenting that it was selling them Digital Content when, in fact, it was really only licensing it to them[.]” The court disagreed: there’s a plausible difference in value between owning outright versus purchasing a revocable license.
Was this commercial advertising or promotion? Elysium argued that the website as a whole was a referral website for Tru Niagen, which advertised Tru Niagen at the top of every page. Thus, any falseadvertising claim would lie against Albaum, not [directly] against ChromaDex. You can find out more here: [link].
Creager sells Montana post drivers (made in China) that compete with the Texas post drivers sold by IDT (advertised as made in the USA). The parties had other disputes, including accusing each other of posting false reviews of the other. The parties compete in the market for skid steer attachments and other products.
9, 2023) Along with updating its previous decision (I didn’t see anything that affected the Lanham Act analysis of the key issue of whether a retailer can sue a supplier for falseadvertising), the court addressed a motion to dismiss by defendant ViaClean.
2023) involves a set of thirteen different professional models whose images were allegedly used without their permission to advertise for the Capital Cabaret, a strip club halfway between Raleigh & Durham, North Carolina. 1125(a)(1) for misrepresentation of sponsorship (FalseAdvertising + False Association).
To say we are disappointed by the events that transpired as a result of this license is an understatement. Lanham Act falseadvertising: Were the statements “commercial advertising or promotion” even though not in a conventional ad?
15, 2021) ThermoLife got a significant success in this appeal of the dismissal of its false patent marking, falseadvertising, and unfair competition claims. And it alleged proximate cause by alleging that its nitrates directly compete with Compound’s falselyadvertised VASO6. Compound Solutions, Inc.,
It does so at the Rose Bowl Stadium under three contracts with Pasadena, including a Master License Agreement, Trademark Agreement, and Trademark Consent Agreement. This also got rid of the breach of contract claim, which was based on the alleged trademark infringement and falseadvertising.
26, 2022) [much other stuff skipped] The parties had a falseadvertising dispute that went to a jury, which found that FIGS wasn’t liable for falselyadvertising the antimicrobial properties of its scrubs. FIGS’ alleged copying of SPI’s products was not relevant to falseadvertising. 2022 WL 18399950, No.
17, 2023) Super-interesting holding that, while there’s no patent field preemption against bringing false patent marking claims under the Lanham Act, Dastar (as expansively interpreted to cover falseadvertising claims) does preclude such claims, possibly only because of party argument. Dismissed with leave to amend.
Digital assets can be protected by IP and have always been capable of being licensed or assigned via a contract, or protected as a trade mark. For example, the owners of the famous “ Grumpy Cat ” meme licensed the use of the name, image and likeness of the cat – and successfully enforced these rights.
These various brands have posted laudatory posts congratulating her for this achievement, while at the same time utilizing her image and Olympic win for their own commercial own use by using it in the form of an advertisement. Now the pertinent question becomes whether the advertisements in question are prohibited under the law.
Atari’s copyright infringement lawsuit against State Farm advances, underscoring the importance of careful clearance in advertising. In addition to copyright infringement, Atari brought claims for business disparagement, false information and advertising, unfair competition, and unjust enrichment.
FalseAdvertising. In general, courts should not permit a falseadvertising claim based on a “safe” representation where the representation is rendered untrue by third-party content. The plaintiffs disavowed a claim based solely on Apple’s “safe” representation. eBay case from 2008.
Since filing the case, Nike has expanded the charges filed to include claims of counterfeiting and falseadvertising. Transparency in licensing agreements, ethical sourcing of digital designs, and respect for creators rights are key to fostering trust in the NFT ecosystem.
Fresh Bourbon allegedly falselyadvertises that Fresh Bourbon is the “first black-owned bourbon distillery in Kentucky,” and makes other related false claims, which is allegedly false because it’s not a distillery, which requires both federal (TTB) and Kentucky (KABC) licenses.
They sought at least $45 million from the government of Puerto Rico for issuing a commemorative license plate for the fiftieth anniversary of Roberto Clemente’s “Hit 3000,” at $21/plate. For trademark, any request was moot since the law requiring the sale of license plates and license labels expired by its own terms on December 31, 2022.
12, 2021) After Lexmark , can a competitor bring a false association claim when the false association is with an unrelated third party? This court answers yes, though limits the effect of that by applying what looks like ordinary falseadvertising analysis.
8, 2023) Imprimis sued defendants, competitors in the compounding pharmacy industry, for falseadvertising, trademark and copyright infringement, and related claims. It alleged that defendants falselyadvertised that they’re in compliance with Section 503A of the FDCA, governing compounding. 2023 WL 7390842, No.
The defendant was initially given “complete and exclusive licensing rights in and to [the selected mares] and all cloned foals.” The Lanham Act claims were styled as false association, “false association with celebrity status,” false designation of origin, and falseadvertising.
Along with copyright claims, McCleese asserted Lanham Act falseadvertising claims. The complaint didn’t allege how his position in the marketplace was harmed in any way; he even alleged that he “does not license his photos for any commercial purpose, does not sell copies of his photos, and his photos are unpublished.”
I’m only addressing ICON’s counterclaims for falseadvertising, not the patent part of the ruling. ICON counterclaimed that Peloton has made false claims in advertisements regarding its status as an innovator and as a tech company, e.g., that it was a “very hardcore technology company. These claims did survive.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content