Remove Advertising Remove False Advertising Remove Law
article thumbnail

[Webinar] Defending Truth in Advertising: Strategies for Combatting False Advertising and Trademark Claims - March 25th, 10:00 am - 11:00 am PT

JD Supra Law

This one-hour CLE session focuses on defending against false advertising and trademark claims, providing practical strategies for brand owners facing allegations of misleading advertising or trademark infringement.

article thumbnail

False Patent Marking as False Advertising: Overcoming Dastar

Patently-O

by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit is set to consider the use of terms like “patented,” “proprietary,” and “exclusive” in commercial advertising can be actionable under § 43(a)(1)(B) of the Lanham Act when their use is not entirely accurate. Crocs largely prevailed in those actions. ” Dawgs brief.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

ambiguity over who was first African-American bourbon distiller in Kentucky dooms false advertising claim

43(B)log

Brough Brothers alleged that Fresh Bourbon falsely advertised that Fresh Bourbon is the first black-owned bourbon distillery in Kentucky, and made other related claims. If a company makes a literally false statement, then it can be presumed that the consumer who receives the statement was deceived. State law claims also failed.

article thumbnail

game spat expands beyond false advertising to TM and (c)

43(B)log

Skillz sued its competitor Papaya, alleging false advertising under federal and state law. The alleged false front website Fair Play for Mobile Games allegedly encouraged and facilitated visitors filing of complaints about mobile gaming companies, other than Skillz and including Papaya, with state attorneys general.

article thumbnail

plaintiff has standing to seek injunctive relief against allegedly falsely advertised penile implant

43(B)log

The Ninth Circuit has held: “[i]n some cases, the threat of future harm may be the consumer’s plausible allegations that she will be unable to rely on the product’s advertising or labeling in the future, and so will not purchase the product although she would like to.”

article thumbnail

Retailer has standing to assert Lanham Act false advertising claims against its own supplier

43(B)log

Lynd advertised the Product as effective against the coronavirus. Ultimately, AHBP took an exclusive license to sell the product in Argentina, with purchasing and advertising/marketing spend minimums. Unsurprisingly, fraudulent inducement, common-law fraud, and negligent inducement claims survived. And proximate cause?

article thumbnail

Disgorgement in a noncomparative false advertising case: doctrinal drift?

43(B)log

Is there some “IP Institute” for judges that is replicating the successes of the Law & Econ institutes for judges in convincing them of what the law is? This allowed McCormick to advertise what seemed like an attractive lower price and charge more. Watkins sued McCormick under the Lanham Act and coordinate state law.