Advertising False Advertising Intellectual Property Patent Infringement 
Patently-O
APRIL 17, 2024
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit is set to consider the use of terms like “patented,” “proprietary,” and “exclusive” in commercial advertising can be actionable under § 43(a)(1)(B) of the Lanham Act when their use is not entirely accurate. Crocs largely prevailed in those actions.
JD Supra Law
SEPTEMBER 16, 2024
26, 2024) - On August 26, 2024, the Western District of Wisconsin issued a decision adjudicating a number of motions in a case involving a thicket of intellectual property claims and counterclaims. and its affiliated parties (“Woodland”), asserting design patent infringement, false advertising, trade secret.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Delaware Intellectual Property Litigation Blog
JANUARY 8, 2022
January 5, 2022), the Court granted Defendant Next Caller’s post-trial renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law of no false advertising under the Lanham Act and to take away the jury’s award of punitive damages. The Court granted Defendant’s motion for two reasons. A copy of the Memorandum Opinion is attached.
43(B)log
DECEMBER 15, 2023
Plaintiff may not directly challenge the Recool as infringing its patents, but just as in Dastar and Sybersound , it is trying to protect its intellectual property rights through the Lanham Act.” There was no meaningful distinction between claims of being the “first” and claims of inventorship. Zobmondo Ent.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
MARCH 7, 2023
for trademark infringement, false advertising and patent infringement. The company holds several patents and trademarks related to its products, including its flagship product, the EMSCULPT device. Indianapolis, Indiana –The Plaintiff, BTL Industries, Inc. 5,572,801 and 6,069,279.
LexBlog IP
JANUARY 10, 2022
Most Section 337 investigations address issues of patent infringement, but Section 337 investigations can also address infringement of other statutory intellectual property (trademarks, copyrights, etc.) In comparison to litigating in U.S. In comparison to litigating in U.S.
IP Tech Blog
JANUARY 10, 2022
Most Section 337 investigations address issues of patent infringement, but Section 337 investigations can also address infringement of other statutory intellectual property (trademarks, copyrights, etc.) In comparison to litigating in U.S. In comparison to litigating in U.S.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
114 
Let's personalize your content