Remove Advertising Remove False Advertising Remove Information Remove Trademark Law
article thumbnail

influencers aren't advertisers' agents, materiality can be common sense, & more in supplement case

43(B)log

Was this commercial advertising or promotion? The court first held that the challenged statement on its own wasn’t pure commercial speech because it “merely purports to convey information about NR and NR supplements” and didn’t refer to ChromaDex or its product; the link was not to a site that itself allowed purchases.

article thumbnail

truthful statement about role in developing product isn't falsified by later split

43(B)log

Hawrych’s name, likeness, and trademark (‘Hawrych MD’) in various advertisements.” Thus, the false advertising claim would be dismissed. False advertising law has a much more structured way of accounting for implications than trademark law does.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Year in Review: The Briefing’s Top 3 Podcast Episodes in 2023

The IP Law Blog

In The Briefing , intellectual property attorney Scott Hervey and his guests provide insight in connection with copyrights, trademarks, patents, trade secrets, false advertising, licensing, promotions, and sweepstakes. The videos and podcasts are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

article thumbnail

Court Denies Injunction in Competitive Keyword Ad Lawsuit–Nursing CE Central v. Colibri

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

This is a competitive keyword advertising lawsuit. The plaintiff has a trademark registration for the “Nursing CE Central” mark for providing continuing education for nurses. This is fine, but it deviates from courts’ efforts over the years to come up with multi-factor variations specific to keyword advertising.

article thumbnail

Internal Search Results Aren’t Trademark Infringing–PEM v. Peninsula

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

This is a case involving a trademark owner and a competitive keyword advertiser. The trademark owner memorably (and ridiculously) characterized the rival as engaging in “keyword conquesting,” a term I encourage you never to use. The court already sent that trademark claim to the jury ( my blog post on that ruling ).

article thumbnail

using an ITU to get non-Amazon platforms to take down competitors

43(B)log

Using the pending trademark application, in June 2021, Johnson submitted a complaint to Twitter alleging that Jones violated the platform’s trademark policy by using The Mahne Tea on his Twitter page, and Twitter suspended Jones’s account. Even without standing, Jones failed to state a claim for false association or false advertising.

article thumbnail

Second Circuit signals some minimal flexibility on Polaroid analysis in another strip club false endorsement case

43(B)log

May 19, 2023) Whereas the timeshare false advertising cases might be making law largely applicable to other timeshare cases, what’s going on in the strip club advertising cases might have somewhat broader implications. The district court concluded that plaintiffs’ false endorsement claims were foreclosed by Electra v.