Trademark and Copyright Law Blog

JULY 9, 2020

While a competitor might wish to use the mark to engage in nominative fair use and comparative advertising, these are, of course, permitted despite a trademark owner’s rights.). The post Booking.whocares: SCOTUS Issues a Headline-Making Trademark Decision… But Does It Really Matter?

Trademark 93

Trademark Registration Trademark Law Fair Use 93

SpicyIP

SEPTEMBER 28, 2023

Image from here Not Everyone’s Cup of “Use” – The Changing Dynamics of “Trademark Use” and “Infringement” in Internet Advertising Nivrati Gupta “New technologies give us new opportunities, but they all raise the question: How do old, familiar laws apply?”

Advertising 110

Advertising Advertising Trademark Marketing 110

LexBlog IP

NOVEMBER 30, 2022

This ground-breaking decision heralds the expansion of traditional fair use defenses to any trademark infringement claims where a defendant’s conduct relates, in any way, to the broad category of activity considered “expressive” under the First Amendment. “The logo depicts an overturned U.S.

Branding 52

Branding Brands Branding Fair Use 52

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 16, 2024

Panel #2, TM, moderated by Vice Dean Felix Wu Jack Daniels says that use as a trademark is special: like copyright’s bête noire, confusion caused by trademark use is the central concern of trademark law. I’ve left out the parts specific to registered trademarks and the reference to treaties.

Trademark 57

Trademark Fair Use Registration False Advertising 57

Copyright Lately

MAY 1, 2023

The new DIY tools aren’t particularly difficult to use, but even technically-challenged wannabe producers can use off-the-shelf apps like Musicfy and Uberduck to perform voice-to-voice and text-to-voice conversions using models trained on the voices of popular artists.

Music 84

Music Copyright Copying Copyright Law 84

IP and Legal Filings

OCTOBER 28, 2023

A fundamental principle of trademark law permits the owner of a well-known trademark to forbid third parties from using it in a manner that would lessen its distinctiveness. In accordance with a provision of trademark law known as trademark dilution, the owner of a brand may.

Trademark 78

Trademark Registering Trademarks Trademark Law Branding 78

43(B)log

DECEMBER 20, 2022

Plaintiffs also alleged infringement of Monbo’s right of publicity, unjust enrichment, and violations of the Lanham Act and related Maryland trademark law. What about fragmented literal similarity based on use of clips from the 2001 Documentary (no clips from the 2003 Documentary were allegedly used)?

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Trademark Copyright Editing 52

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 30, 2023

The Division Bench judgement was passed on October 13, in response to the reference made by a Single Judge Bench where the Court disagreed with the finding of the coordinate bench in Boehringer Ingelheim v. The judgement was passed by a Single Judge Bench of Justice Manish Pitale. Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. Bolt Technology v.

IP 124

IP Copyright Trademark Intellectual Property 124

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 1, 2023

VIP Products, on the other hand, argued that their toy was protected under the doctrine of “fair use” as it was being used in a non-trademark sense, and that it was not likely to cause confusion among consumers. ” Id. In VIP Products v. Jack Daniels Products , 953 F.3d 3d 1170 , 1172 (9 th Cir.

Trademark 52

Trademark Intellectual Property Branding Brands 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JUNE 21, 2023

Ramsey is a Professor of Law at the University of San Diego School of Law. She writes and teaches in the trademark law area, and recently wrote a paper with Professor Christine Haight Farley that focuses on speech-protective doctrines in trademark infringement law.] Source-identifying uses of marks.

Trademark 100

Trademark Blogging Trademark Law Fair Use 100

43(B)log

NOVEMBER 8, 2023

I’m going to talk briefly about last term’s Jack Daniels case—a trademark infringement and dilution case—as well as Elster, argued last week, in which the Justices appeared inclined to reject a First Amendment challenge to the refusal to register the claimed mark “TRUMP TOO SMALL” for t-shirts. Trademark: In Jack Daniel’s v.

False Advertising 73

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Trademark 73

43(B)log

JUNE 24, 2022

Does the ornamentality doctrine have doctrinal purchase elsewhere in trademark law? In the fair use calculus? In what ways is the ornamental nature of a defendant’s use relevant to defences based on artistic or expressive use (or some other defence)? But there is a defense for nondistinctive use.

Trademark Law 54

Trademark Law Law Trademark Fair Use 54

Patently-O

DECEMBER 12, 2021

Missouri’s predominant purpose test, which inquires into whether the predominant purpose of using the famous person’s name or identity is to exploit its commercial value; or whether “the predominant purpose of the product is to make an expressive comment on or about a celebrity.” [15] Rothman refers to this as the “relatedness test.”

Registration 69

Registration Government Advertising Advertising 69