43(B)log

OCTOBER 11, 2023

Thus, “not only are these not the classes of products or services that trademark law protects, but issuing motor vehicle license plates and tags cannot be considered commercial use, as it is a clear government activity.” False advertising: No Lexmark standing for want of proximate cause.

Licensing 48

Licensing False Advertising Advertising Advertising 48

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JULY 25, 2021

Aliign “is an event, lifestyle, and apparel company” allegedly with a first trademark use in 2011. More Posts About Keyword Advertising. Ohio Bans Competitive Keyword Advertising by Lawyers. Want to Engage in Anti-Competitive Trademark Bullying? lululemon is the well-known yoga gear company.

Advertising 107

Advertising Advertising Settlement Trademark 107

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

SEPTEMBER 28, 2021

Read literally, all advertising “allow[s] for arranging the sale or purchase of goods,” so this law potentially obligates EVERY ad-supported publisher to undertake the content moderation obligations the bill imposes on online marketplaces. ” I mean, pretty much every physical product meets this definition, right? .”

Trademark 139

Trademark False Advertising Advertising Advertising 139

43(B)log

DECEMBER 1, 2022

The Lounge has been in operation since 1964 and has gained regional fame by hosting many entertainment and athletic events.” Grimaldi grounds, the district court’s grant of summary judgment to MTV on the resulting trademark claims. This justification is at least consistent with the core idea of trademark law.

Artistic Work 62

Artistic Work Television Trademark Trademark Law 62

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 30, 2023

Ujoy Technology and Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha vs Tech Square Engineering Pvt Ltd [Delhi High Court] This year the concept of transborder reputation in trademark law saw two important interpretations from the Delhi High Court. Bolt Technology v. First, in Toyota v. Makemytrip (India) Pvt. Novex Communications Pvt.

IP 124

IP Copyright Trademark Intellectual Property 124

43(B)log

OCTOBER 4, 2021

For about a decade, courts had realized that IIC had gone way too far, and had expanded liability in ways that didn’t protect consumers and facilitated anticompetitive claims about false advertising. The court or appeals also commented that relying on IIC might change the available damages and relief—but how exactly?

IP 94

IP Trademark Advertising Advertising 94