IP Intelligence

JULY 17, 2023

s generative AI technology, including whether OpenAI has engaged in “unfair or deceptive privacy or data security practices” or “unfair or deceptive practices relating to risks of harm to consumers, including reputational harm.” The FTC has launched an investigation of OpenAI Inc.’s

Due Diligence 98

Due Diligence Technology Privacy Advertising 98

IP and Legal Filings

NOVEMBER 15, 2024

It also introduces a due diligence process under Rule 3 and 4 which the Online Gaming Industry has to comply to. There are certain restrictions imposed regarding advertisement and promotion of harmful content, and a grievance redressal mechanism is also set up.

Advertising 88

Advertising Advertising Law Due Diligence 88

IP Intelligence

JULY 17, 2023

s generative AI technology, including whether OpenAI has engaged in “unfair or deceptive privacy or data security practices” or “unfair or deceptive practices relating to risks of harm to consumers, including reputational harm.” The FTC has launched an investigation of OpenAI Inc.’s

Due Diligence 52

Due Diligence Technology Privacy Advertising 52

LexBlog IP

JULY 17, 2023

s generative AI technology, including whether OpenAI has engaged in “unfair or deceptive privacy or data security practices” or “unfair or deceptive practices relating to risks of harm to consumers, including reputational harm.” The FTC has launched an investigation of OpenAI Inc.’s

Due Diligence 52

Due Diligence Technology Privacy Advertising 52

IP and Legal Filings

APRIL 19, 2022

The safe harbour exemption clause was added to Section 79 of the Information Technology Act of 2000, which protected an intermediary from liability for third-party content on its platform if it completed “due diligence” as specified by the Central Government.

Copyright Law 81

Copyright Law Copyright Law Copyright Infringement 81

IP Tech Blog

MARCH 18, 2022

For a succinct background on NFTs, see Your NFT Playbook , by our colleagues Kyle Fath, Alan Friel, and Carlton Daniel, posted in Consumer Privacy World. The complaint asserts trademark infringement, misrepresentation and unfair competition due to StockX’s minting of sneaker-related NFT’s using NIKE trademarks without Nike’s authorization.

Trademark 62

Trademark Non-Fungible Tokens Branding Brands 62

LexBlog IP

MARCH 18, 2022

For a succinct background on NFTs, see Your NFT Playbook , by our colleagues Kyle Fath, Alan Friel, and Carlton Daniel, posted in Consumer Privacy World. StockX responded that its NFTs are permissible trademark “fair use” as part of its retail sales and advertising of authentic NIKE sneakers.

Trademark 52

Trademark Non-Fungible Tokens Intellectual Property Branding 52