This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
If memes are so powerful to engage users with the underlying content, as recognized by their increased use as an advertising tool, then how can the same corporations claim that memes are creating a serious harm that the law should recognize and protect? Put differently, is it fair for corporations to have their cake and eat it too?
Rights Conferred on Owner: The copyright owner of a piece of artwork has the exclusive right to make copies, sell or distribute copies, prepare derivativeworks based on the copyrighted artwork, and publicly display the artwork. Artists or designers invest a lot of skill and creativity to make their work distinctive.
Rights Conferred on Owner: The owner of the copyright in a piece of artwork has the exclusive right to make copies, sell or distribute copies, prepare derivativeworks based on the copyrighted artwork, and publicly display the artwork. Taking legal action when an artist’s IPRs or moralrights are violated.
Like most copyright systems, French copyright law does not leave much room for the freedom of authors of transformative graphic works (also called “derivativeworks”). Three interesting cases on derivativeworks, two involving Jeff Koons and one Tintin, have recently put French copyright law in the international spotlight (e.g.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content