Remove Advertising Remove Derivative Work Remove Moral Rights
article thumbnail

IT’S THE COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT FOR ME: WHY CLAIMS AGAINST MEME CONTENT SHOULD NOT MATTER

JIPL Online

If memes are so powerful to engage users with the underlying content, as recognized by their increased use as an advertising tool, then how can the same corporations claim that memes are creating a serious harm that the law should recognize and protect? Put differently, is it fair for corporations to have their cake and eat it too?

article thumbnail

What Protects The Intellectual Property Created By Artists Or Designers?

Intepat

Rights Conferred on Owner: The copyright owner of a piece of artwork has the exclusive right to make copies, sell or distribute copies, prepare derivative works based on the copyrighted artwork, and publicly display the artwork. Artists or designers invest a lot of skill and creativity to make their work distinctive.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

What Protects The Intellectual Property Created By Artists Or Designers?

Intepat

Rights Conferred on Owner: The owner of the copyright in a piece of artwork has the exclusive right to make copies, sell or distribute copies, prepare derivative works based on the copyrighted artwork, and publicly display the artwork. Taking legal action when an artist’s IPRs or moral rights are violated.

article thumbnail

Derivative works: the Adventures of Koons and Tintin in French copyright law

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Like most copyright systems, French copyright law does not leave much room for the freedom of authors of transformative graphic works (also called “derivative works”). Three interesting cases on derivative works, two involving Jeff Koons and one Tintin, have recently put French copyright law in the international spotlight (e.g.