This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
5, 2022) The court finds that, contrary to the district court’s holding, at least some of the underlying lawsuit’s allegations claimed that Vitamin Energy made disparaging statements about 5-hour Energy, thus triggering the insurer’s duty to defend under its “advertising injury” policy.
Boston Suburban allegedly continued to use the “Logan Car Service” mark in online keyword advertising and in metatags, and continued to copy customer reviews from Boston Carriage’s website and publish them on online review platforms.
Opposer James Barnard claimed prior use of the mark MANDALA for business consulting and branding services, and alleged likelihood of confusion with the Applicant's proposed mark MANDALAEVERYWEAR for marketing consulting services. Text Copyright John L. James Barnard v. Mandala Wear, LLC , Opposition No.
Defendants' letter allegedly copied text from LStar Trademark infringement: LStar never specified what its trademarks or servicemarks were. Not every word on a label or ad is a mark. Vining, 2021 WL 4344891, No. 5:20-CV-184-FL (E.D.N.C. LStar didn’t plead its own trademark use. What about injury? “[H]ere
The Board affirmed refusals to register the product design shown below as a trademark for acupressure mats and pillows, and as a servicemark for retail store services featuring those goods, finding that the product shape lacked acquired distinctiveness as a trademark and failed to function as a servicemark.
The Board found the Couture case to be relevant: there, the applicant had not rendered his entertainment services in commerce as of his filing date, but had merely advertised his "readiness, willingness and ability" to do so. What is the first use date for the restaurant's services? Text Copyright John L. Playdom, Inc. ,
The parties previously partnered nonexclusively so that PureThink would sell and support the commercial version of Neo4j; upon termination, PureThink expressly agreed to “cease using any trademarks, servicemarks and other designations of Plaintiffs.” Summary judgment granted on state and federal false advertising claims.
“become ordained” or “become a minister,” is strong evidence that Applicant’s consumers will perceive “get ordained” not as a servicemark but rather for the commonly understood meaning of the words. Its intent that the phrase function as a servicemark is irrelevant. Text Copyright John L. Welch 2022.
As readers of Velocity of Content know, the US has had a copyright statute on the books since 1790, following closely on the heels of the (then) freshly minted copyright and patent clause in the Constitution. Copyright Office, after what amounts to a much lighter review process. See also: RC Cola, Polar Cola, Jolt!—and
Yesterday, it was all about key developments in the copyright field in the Africa IP Highlights 2023 – the result of collaboration between myself and several IP practitioners and researchers across Africa: Clarisse Mideva ; Rita Chindah ; and Jessie Mgonga. Today, it’s about the trade marks.
The print-on-demand service at issue is Pixels, who has appeared on this blog before. The plaintiff paints fish, has a trademark in his name, “DeYoung,” and has registered copyrights. Redbubble * Zazzle Loses Copyright Jury Verdict, and That’s Bad News for Print-on-Demand Publishers–Greg Young Publishing v.
Trademark Law: A powerful branding program that combines a strong trademark or servicemark and a memorable advertising and marketing campaign. Copyright Law: An important and original work of authorship, in the literary, musical, visual, dramatic or other arts. Nominees can be individuals, groups or corporations.
This is clear from the third-party servicemark, trade name and descriptive uses discussed above, and from Applicant’s prior Supplemental Register registration, as well as her disclaimer of “SOLAR” and Section 2(f) claim in her original application. Text Copyright John L. And so, the Board affirmed the refusal to register.
The Board observed that "where the proposed mark is not inherently distinctive because it is comprised of common features in the relevant field or is typically used or perceived as ornamentation, length of use alone generally is not sufficient to satisfy the elevated burden of proving acquired distinctiveness." Text Copyright John L.
COLORADO mark in commerce as of the filing date of the underlying application because it had not yet rendered any pageant services under the mark, and that any prior use under the license inured to the benefit of the licensor, not to Abundance. Text Copyright John L. Emphasis supplied]. Intermed Comms., 90 USPQ2d at 1308.
Trademark Law: A powerful branding program that combines a strong trademark or servicemark and a memorable advertising and marketing campaign. Copyright Law: An important and original work of authorship, in the literary, musical, visual, dramatic or other arts. Nominees can be individuals, groups or corporations.
Those intentions and expectations are also reflected in promotional and advertising material for the program. Petitioner CBC Mortgage, not the respondent, was first to offer mortgage services under the mark. Text Copyright John L. 3d 1023, 123 USPQ2d 1024, 1028 (Fed. Read comments and post your comment here. Welch 2022.
in the field of wake, ski, surf, snowboard, motocross, mountain bike, BMX, and skate” portion of the Contested Services, Jones argued that Monster "produced no evidence in discovery that it has ever trained athletes under the [marks of the Counterclaimed Registrations],” and the Contested Services "have never been advertised or sold."
This is created through personal contact with the client in connection with the use of services or products, contact with sales or client support, or through brand communication (marketing). A trademark is a symbol (word or otherwise) used to distinguish the goods or services of one source from those of others.
Furthermore, petitioner's sales and advertising figures were not placed in industry context. Although Petitioner has not proven acquired distinctiveness, Petitioner has at least established that it began using PERMIT.COM in a manner consistent with servicemark use as early as 2013. Text Copyright John L. Welch 2024.
It rejected Di-Namic's argument that the proposed mark is not being used merely as a song title, but also to signify that it offers musical composition services as a logical prerequisite of the musical composition being licensed. Text Copyright John L. Read comments and post your comment here. TTABlogger comment: WYHA?
Text Copyright John L. Read comments and post your comment here. TTABlogger comment: Since the applicant appeared pro se, I decided not to label this a WYHA? BTW, is the term generic, as a subgenus? Welch 2022.
It means only the registered proprietor of Amul, i.e. Kaira District Cooperative Milk Producers can register the word Amul for any class of goods or services. Marks that have achieved such status and reputation are known as well known trademarks.
The Board was not impressed by this showing: Although this evidence is relevant, it does not establish Respondent’s lack of use of its mark for a three-year period. Text Copyright John L. TTABlogger comment: At a minimum, petitioner should have moved to compel discovery responses. Welch 2021.
Second, the representative samples of Opposer’s advertising focus on the CME GROUP mark and CME GROUP logo, not the NYMEX mark. This throws doubt on LaPierre’s testimony that Opposer spends a million dollars a year advertising the NYMEX servicemark. Text Copyright John L. Welch 2021.
Petitioner claimed that its restaurant had a "soft opening" in September 2014, with the mark THE HAPPIEST HOUR displayed on signage, but its evidence was "contradictory, inconsistent, and indefinite." Several press releases were issued at that time, but they did not constitute servicemark use. Text Copyright John L.
Evidence in the form of listings and advertisements, such as in yellow and white page phone book listings, triggers a presumption that a third-party servicemark is in fact in use by third-parties, possibly making a registrant’s mark weak. Text Copyright John L. And so, the Board reversed the refusal to register.
This helps them stand out and acts as a prime instrument for advertising and selling their products. Primarily, a trademark distinguishes the goods and services of one trader from those of others. Trademarks have become an important part of running a business. Increasingly, businesses across India are applying for trademarks.
This helps them stand out and acts as a prime instrument for advertising and selling their products. Primarily, a trademark distinguishes the goods and services of one trader from those of others. Trademarks have become an important part of running a business. Increasingly, businesses across India are applying for trademarks.
The Board observed that, as made clear by the Trademark Act, the USPTO "is statutorily constrained to register matter on the Principal Register if and only if it functions as a mark." Text Copyright John L. In re Brunetti , 2022 USPQ3d 764, at *9. Read comments and post your comment here. Never crossed my mind. How about you?
"There is no way to determine the extent to which, or even if, consumers of banking services associate the Ring Design alone with Petitioner." Nor did California put its advertising expenses "in context," i.e., in comparison with the expenditures of other banks. Text Copyright John L. Read comments and post your comment here.
Applicant manufactures, advertises and sells, under the stylized HME mark, goods that opposer previously sold, to customers who previously were opposer’s customers in the United. The Marks: The Board found the involved marks to be similar in appearance, sound, connotation and commercial impression. Text Copyright John L.
Inherent Distinctiveness: The Supreme Court's decision in Two Pesos , involving the decor of a Mexican restaurant, established that "adornments in a building structure" may be protectable as a servicemark." Applicant's specimens of use and its advertising evidence depicted the side of the building that also displays the hotel name.
.” The “Claiming User Date” category pertains to trademarks that are already in use by the applicant in the market, while the “Proposed to be Used” category applies to trademarks or servicemarks that are for future use. Supporting documents should be attached to substantiate these claims.
Advertisement in Trademark Journal. Once the trademark is approved, the same will be advertised in the Trademark Journal. The advertisement in the Trademark Journal will remain open for 4 months in respect of opposition procedure. If the Examiner does not approve the application, then the same will go for hearing.
According to Lifestyle Equities, BHPC products that were lawfully made, advertised, and distributed in the United States with the permission of the US rights owner are being marketed and sold by Amazon in the United Kingdom and the European Union, which is a kind of counterfeiting.
According to Lifestyle Equities, BHPC products that were lawfully made, advertised, and distributed in the United States with the permission of the US rights owner are being marketed and sold by Amazon in the United Kingdom and the European Union, which is a kind of counterfeiting.
Examining Attorney Jaclyn Kidwell Walker maintained: "It is clear based on all the attached evidence that applicant ONLY provides yacht payment services and does not engage in the chartering services themselves." Text Copyright John L. citations omitted]. Read comments and post your comment here. TTABlogger comment: WYHA?
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content