Remove Advertising Remove Contracts Remove Fair Use Remove Litigation
article thumbnail

This Blog Has Jumped the Shark: I’m Covering a Copyright Opinion About a Tattoo of Tiger King’s Joe Exotic–Cramer v. Netflix

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Instead, she gets a 12(b)(6) dismissal based on fair use. Purpose and Character of Use. “use of the entire image of the Tattoo in the 8-way split screen montage, with visual and audio effects, is appropriate to Defendants’ transformative purpose of showing the public’s reaction to Season One of the Tiger King series.”

article thumbnail

Should Copyright Preemption Moot Anti-Scraping TOS Terms? (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy Many characterize the law of copyright preemption of contracts as a circuit split. It’s not that half of federal judges have adopted one clear stance on copyright preemption of contracts and the other half have adopted another clear stance. But fair use isn’t a defense to a breach of contract claim.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

WIPIP session 4: ™ & Consumers

43(B)log

Mary Katherine Amerine, Reasonably Careless Consumers in TM & False Advertising How do courts treat consumers in TM and false advertising cases? False advertising uses v different framework: consider the challenged ad as a whole, including disclaimers and qualifying language. Beer Nuts, Bulls’ Eye v.

article thumbnail

My “Summer” 2022 Activities

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

6th Edition of Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases and Materials (with Rebecca Tushnet). Regulation of Political Advertising (2022 Edition). Regulation of Housing Advertising (2022 Edition). Regulation of Housing Advertising (2022 Edition). I posted a chapter from the book: Online Contracts. Blog Posts.

Editing 90
article thumbnail

A 512(f) Plaintiff Wins at Trial! ??–Alper Automotive v. Day to Day Imports

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

To my knowledge, the only litigated case that resulted in a 512(f) win was Online Policy Group v. The court also credits the self-serving claim by the successor licensee that it considered fair use by comparing the works and evaluating if the works were being sold commercially or for other purposes. A New 512(f) Plaintiff Win!

article thumbnail

Legit or Lawsuit – Fake Drake AI Song

The IP Law Blog

The issue of whether training an AI tool on existing copyright-protected works constitutes infringement or is fair use is currently being litigated in a number of cases. The Fake Drake AI songs were not being used to sell products. California also has a common law right of publicity that’s a bit broader than the statute.

Music 52
article thumbnail

Legit or Lawsuit – Fake Drake AI Song

LexBlog IP

The issue of whether training an AI tool on existing copyright-protected works constitutes infringement or is fair use is currently being litigated in a number of cases. ” The Fake Drake AI songs were not being used to sell products. such products, merchandise, or goods without such person’s prior consent.”

Music 52