This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In responding to the unprecedented COVID-19 challenges, companies around the world are rushing to capitalize on the current crisis by advertising the effectiveness of their products in containing the virus spread. As fear and anxiety proliferate during this pandemic, fraudulent or falseadvertisements also surge and explode.
Also, there should not be a “use in commerce” when the advertiser (here, Troia) doesn’t actually offer any goods or services in the marketplace. As the court says later, “it seems unlikely that an Internet user who reads defendant’s advertisements would believe that they belong to or are endorsed by plaintiffs.”
Lynd advertised the Product as effective against the coronavirus. Ultimately, AHBP took an exclusive license to sell the product in Argentina, with purchasing and advertising/marketing spend minimums. the Lanham Act falseadvertising claim survived.
19, 2024) Not a surprise, but fills a gap in the caselaw: employment ads arent commercial advertising and promotion for the business trying to hire. If youre interested in food, want to make money, or want to learn the restaurant business, we want to hear from you. Kangnam1957, Inc., 2024 WL 5440252, No.
The court says that Amazon “easily satisfies” this factor: Plaintiff’s claims are all based on the theory that Defendants ‘continue to allow unlawful sellers to maintain their accounts’ and ‘permit them to advertise’ on Defendants’ website. This argument has failed so many times. Google opinion.
28, 2021) Mostly this case is about other things, but the court finds a duty to defend in the underlying falseadvertising case. Luxottica was sued in a class action alleging that its AccuFit system for prescription eyeglasses was falselyadvertised as more accurate.
Rebecca Tushnet and I are pleased to announce the sixth edition of our casebook, Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases & Materials. We also have two online-only chapters on housing discrimination (Chapter 20) and political advertising (Chapter 21), both also freely downloadable. Chapter 2: What is an Advertisement?
Similarly, “ordinary business transactions” can satisfy the substantial assistance element of an aiding and abetting claim “if the [defendant] actually knew those transactions were assisting the [principal] in committing a specific tort. They allegedly “directly run” ad campaigns for their clients, including Beyond Global.
Rebecca Tushnet and I are pleased to announce the seventh edition of our casebook, Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases & Materials. We also have two online-only chapters on housing discrimination (Chapter 20) and political advertising (Chapter 21), both also freely downloadable. Price: $12 * Kindle.
6, 2022) The district court reverses the bankruptcy court ruling ( discussed here ) that held that falseadvertising had interfered with the debtor’s estate in violation of the automatic stay. The back of the advertisement said, among other things, “Windstream’s future is unknown, but Spectrum is here to stay.”
The parties used to have an ongoing business relationship in which both companies outsourced clients to each other and engaged in regular communications regarding their business operations. It also allegedly resumed promoting and advertising the domain name “logan-car-service.com” and re-routing visitors to its own website.
2, 2021) Rex sued Zillow and the National Association of Realtors for antitrust and falseadvertising violations. Surprisingly, the antitrust claims survive, as do falseadvertising claims agains Zillow. Lanham Act claim: Was this commercial advertising or promotion? C21-312 TSZ, 2021 WL 3930694 (W.D.
Despite Romag , the court declines to award disgorgement or fees in this falseadvertising case. A jury found that Harbor Breeze proved all elements of liability for falseadvertising but awarded $0 in damages and profits. And they used the phrase “Feel the Harbor Breezes” in a pay-per-click advertisement on Google.
The relief provided in the settlement (at least for those whose purchases are verifiable by Macy’s business records or who can provide proof of purchase) likely meets or exceeds what any class member could have procured by an individual lawsuit.” But fraud and unjust enrichment, along with UCC breach of warranty, did not create any conflicts.
They allegedly wrongfully ousted Corkum and, when he asserted his rights, incorporated Oak City to continue the business, allegedly with LStar’s equipment, money, and intellectual property. This was unambiguous and literally false, and likely material given its centrality. Vining, 2021 WL 4344891, No. 5:20-CV-184-FL (E.D.N.C.
12, 2023) Following a large verdict for Monster on falseadvertising claims, this opinion discusses extensively the requirements for injunctive relief in falseadvertising cases. But Defendants have brought on themselves these unfortunate consequences through their falseadvertising.”
The statements were “commercial advertising meant to sell a product, and generally there ‘can be no constitutional objection to the suppression of commercial messages that do not accurately inform the public.’” The First Amendment has long coexisted with no-fault falseadvertising laws. The California Supreme Court reversed.
The stamps thus allegedly operate as powerful advertising, allowing Brazilian plywood companies to market their products as conforming to an important American safety standard. Google didn’t attest to anything about the locksmiths; it was like a building that rents space to business owners.
The plaintiffs alleged that the stamps themselves were “a powerful form of advertising because they allow the Brazilian plywood companies to market their products as conforming to an important American safety standard.” pictures of not-good plywood from case Plaintiffs alleged both direct and contributory falseadvertising.
To many trademark owners, it’s a simple decision to sue when the advertiser includes the trademark in the ad copy. More Posts About Keyword Advertising. Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute FalseAdvertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet Google. * Competitive Keyword Advertising Claim Fails–Reflex Media v. LoanStreet v.
You can see Seeking Arrangements’ ad (highlighted) showing above Luxy’s own ad and mixed in with ads for unrelated products: The court says: Plaintiffs’ advertisement does not contain the word “Luxy” or appear to cause any more confusion than the other three advertisements. More Posts About Keyword Advertising.
25, 2022) I know it probably seems sometimes like I approve of every expansive use of falseadvertising law, but sometimes even I find an aggressive position to go too far. It is enough if a defendant provides “a necessary product or service, without which the falseadvertising would not be possible.”
14, 2022) Once in a blue moon, a falseadvertising-based antitrust claim survives a motion to dismiss in a circuit that imposes a list of excessive requirements on such claims. Consumers and advertisers adequately alleged that Facebook has monopoly power in social network/social media (consumers) and social advertising markets.
A Florida medical spa has settled a federal lawsuit with Houston-based rapper 50 Cent over a photo he took with its owner that was later allegedly used on social media to promote the business' services without his authorization.
7, 2022) The court upheld a contempt finding based on an underlying falseadvertising claim. caused ExeGi to lose business.” The injunction didn’t define the term, but since it was based on a Lanham Act violation, “commercial advertising or promotion” was the proper guidepost. De Simone v. VSL Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
It has more than 400 commercial customers, including global enterprises such as Walmart, Comcast, Cisco, and eBay, and also does substantial business with government agencies, including US agencies. Summary judgment granted on state and federal falseadvertising claims. False designation of origin: Yep.
The claims are mostly the kind of trade secret/tortious interference claims you’d expect from this setup, and I won’t say much about them, but there is also a falseadvertising claim about alleged misrepresentations of distributors’ income with Melaleuca.
InterNACHI argued that ASHI’s tagline constituted Lanham Act falseadvertising because it portrays ASHI’s entire membership as being educated, tested, verified, and certified, even though its membership includes so-called “novice” inspectors who have yet to complete training or become certified.
AB allegedly began advertising for a similar product, claiming that its load bars have “30% more Holding Power than similar Disposable Load Bars,” allegedly an admitted reference to Logistick. AB argued that its ad never mentioned or referenced Logistick, so it couldn’t interfere with Logistick’s business. AB Airbags, Inc.,
30, 2025) This is a ruling on 19 motions to exclude expert testimony in this case, which is mostly an antitrust case; I will focus only on some falseadvertising-relevant rulings. As for her surveysone of home users and one of out-of-home users like office usersthe court also allowed them.
Route Consultant is a consultancy business that serves ISPs, as well as another type of FedEx contractor—transportation service providers or TSPs, who provide long-distance transportation services as opposed to actual package delivery, which is done by ISPs. Together they are known as CSPs, contracted service providers.
million consent judgment, which defendants touted in a press release and advertised on Zinus’s website even after the court vacated the stipulated judgment. Courts have generally harmonized the Lanham Act with the Patent Act by requiring bad faith before claims about patent infringement can constitute falseadvertising.
OSD’s signal-to-noise statement was literally false because it advertised its amplifier as having 115 decibels on numerous websites even though OSD said in other statements under penalty of perjury that the signal-to-noise ratio was 104 decibels, and it didn’t submit test results or objective evidence that it was 115.
28, 2022) The parties compete to provide online ordinations to individuals who wish to perform marriage ceremonies and accuse each other of misconduct in advertising. Lexmark , the court held, didn’t supersede the presumption of injury for false comparative advertising. C19-0301RAJ (W.D.
17, 2020) A lot of stuff here; I will ignore the non-falseadvertising related aspects of this mostly antitrust case. The court says the usual not-good things about falseadvertising’s relationship to antitrust, unfortunately: Deceptive speech usually doesn’t violate antitrust laws. 17-md-2785-DDC-TJJ (D.
But the FDA, independent reviews at scientific journals, and even some of Amgen’s own employees criticized the advertising claims as unsupported and misleading. According to Defendant’s internal memoranda, the advertising campaign was designed to “optimally position Onpro in [the] face of biosimilar competition.” Sandoz Inc.
May 11, 2021) Facebook’s application of “Russia state-controlled media” label to a news page on Facebook was not commercial advertising or promotion. Mentioned here mostly to highlight the differences in pleading standards applied to trademark and falseadvertising claims.
Fifteen years ago, courts generally avoided categorical pronouncements about the legitimacy of competitive keyword advertising. The message from the Second Circuit is plain: stop bringing competitive keyword advertising cases. This ruling doesn’t address the scenario where the advertiser’s ad copy references the trademark.
This allegedly harmed Geomatrix’s business. A similar fate awaited other Michigan common-law business tort claims: business defamation/injurious falsehood, fraud/misrepresentation, and interference with prospective economic advantage. Standard 40 certification is not a “consumer” good or service.
In fact, Chen alleged, approximately 25% of its products—including its most popular products—were excluded from the advertised sale. .: “xx% Off Your Purchase,” “xx% Off Your Order,” or “xx% Off One Item.” "See See what's new--and take 20% off your order!"
24, 2023) “This case arises out of alleged misuse of copyrighted images, eventually leading to a dispute … that resulted in falsebusiness reviews, malicious e-mails, and mutual efforts to interfere with each other’s business.” The parties had other disputes, including accusing each other of posting false reviews of the other.
Was this commercial advertising or promotion? Elysium argued that the website as a whole was a referral website for Tru Niagen, which advertised Tru Niagen at the top of every page. Thus, any falseadvertising claim would lie against Albaum, not [directly] against ChromaDex. You can find out more here: [link].
Eric Goldman and I are pleased to announce the seventh edition of our casebook, Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases & Materials. We also have two online-only chapters on housing discrimination (Chapter 20) and political advertising (Chapter 21), both also freely downloadable. Price: $12 * Kindle. Price: $30 + shipping and tax.
The falseadvertising counterclaim arose from a legal memo that IHS sent to customers who had been contacted by two people on behalf of defendant TDM: We understand that you have been contacted by Trade Data Monitor offering an equivalent service to the Global Trade Atlas.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content