LexBlog IP

SEPTEMBER 13, 2023

The cannabis industry presents a unique opportunity for former employees to misappropriate a company’s intellectual property. In this example, if the Michigan cannabis company has not taken any steps to protect its marks in California, fewer remedies (if any) are available to stop its brand’s misappropriation.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Branding Brands Branding 52

LexBlog IP

SEPTEMBER 6, 2023

In this release, we will discuss how a cannabis business can use trademarks for brand protection – despite the fact that federal law prohibits filing a cannabis-related trademark. Although state registration can provide trademark protection, such protection is limited geographically.

Trademark 52

Trademark Registration Ownership Business 52

IP and Legal Filings

NOVEMBER 30, 2022

By 2050, the predicted $0.5 Trade in goods and services, investments, intellectual property, dispute resolution, e-commerce, small and medium-sized businesses, and economic cooperation are the main topics of discussion during the negotiations. Impact on the IPR Regime.

Intellectual Property 68

Intellectual Property Marketing Marketing IP 68