LexBlog IP

SEPTEMBER 13, 2023

The cannabis industry presents a unique opportunity for former employees to misappropriate a company’s intellectual property. In this example, if the Michigan cannabis company has not taken any steps to protect its marks in California, fewer remedies (if any) are available to stop its brand’s misappropriation.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Branding Branding Brands 52

IP and Legal Filings

NOVEMBER 30, 2022

By 2050, the predicted $0.5 Trade in goods and services, investments, intellectual property, dispute resolution, e-commerce, small and medium-sized businesses, and economic cooperation are the main topics of discussion during the negotiations. Impact on the IPR Regime.

Intellectual Property 95

Intellectual Property Marketing Marketing IP 95

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 30, 2023

Yet cannabis businesses continue to grapple with protecting their brands, as trademark protection at the federal level remains unavailable. It is common for a growing business to be targeted by brands looking to make a statement and enforce their marks. He can be reached at 248-631-2050 or MJotanovic@dickinsonwright.com.

Due Diligence 52

Due Diligence Intellectual Property Branding Branding 52

LexBlog IP

SEPTEMBER 6, 2023

In this release, we will discuss how a cannabis business can use trademarks for brand protection – despite the fact that federal law prohibits filing a cannabis-related trademark. He can be reached at 248-631-2050 or MJotanovic@dickinsonwright.com. His bio can be viewed here. His bio can be viewed here.

Trademark 52

Trademark Registration Ownership Business 52

SpicyIP

OCTOBER 31, 2023

She is keenly interested in Intellectual Property Law, Technology Law, and Corporate Law ]. million breast cancer cases are expected globally by 2050. [ This post is authored by SpicyIP Intern Tejaswini Kaushal with inputs and comments from Swaraj and Praharsh. Tejaswini is a 3rd-year B.A. – It imposes a burden of 17.7

Licensing 72

Licensing Government Reporting Patent 72