This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This brings us to the discussion of their personality rights, which confer upon an individual the exclusive right to govern how their persona is depicted in the publicdomain, particularly for commercial purposes. 2] Rajat Sharma v M/s Independent News Service Pvt Ltd, Delhi High Court, [2024][link] 16 January 2025. [3]
The First prize goes to Pravertna Sulakshya , from Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Punjab (Batch of 2025) for their essay titled, “ An IPR-Kajal for Dupes’ Evil Eye? To back this, the essay highlights various shortcomings and inconsistencies in the US and Indian context in the free-speech / copyright interplay.
The gaming sector faced such an outbreak in recent years as AI tools, which were trained on fan-created content, sparked the consent and fairuse debate. Forming Exclusive Rights A sui generis intellectual property system based on AI-generated works might provide some degree of protection and also be a bridge to the publicdomain.
Welcome to the rollercoaster world of YouTube and copyright, where creativity collides with boundaries, and fairuse lines get blurred faster than a TikTok trend. If someone creates music, films, or memes, they can be considered their owners, especially if it isn’t in publicdomain. 1] Sounds fair, right?
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content