This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
11, 2025) examined three essential questions, 1) were the Westlaw headnotes and key number system taxonomy protected by copyright, 2) did Rosss copying of the headnotes to create legal memos used to train Rosss AI system infringe copyright, subject to the defense of fairuse, and 3) was Ross copyingfairuse.…
Meta admitted the use of these unofficial sources early on. At the same time, however, the company denied the copyright infringement allegations, noting that it would rely on a fairuse defense, at least in part. Meta could argue that the use of the pirated books as AI training data qualifies as fairuse.
2025 WL 89191 (S.D.N.Y. 14, 2025) This cases involves two videos, one involving Michael Jordan that someone posted to Twitter (seemingly without permission?), ” Amount taken: “Townsquare copied the entire Jordan video. .” ” Amount taken: “Townsquare copied the entire Jordan video.
Analysing the impact of Indian copyright law on fairuse in academic and critical writing. Evaluating the doctrine of fairuse for Indian social media platforms in light of global cases. In the event that a cited material does not have an online copy or reference, only endnotes must be used.
The Court has granted summary judgment in respect of 2,830 headnotes belonging to Thomson Reuters and admittedly used by Ross Intelligence to train its Natural Language Processing and Artificial Enabled Legal Research tool, finding Direct Copyright Infringement and rejecting fairuse. But, first, Some History!
In a January 2024 report and recommendation later adopted by the court , the magistrate judge found that the repost infringed the plaintiff’s display right simply because it shows a copy of the photo on Chicken Joes social media account. FairUse Declawed. For that reason, Prepared Food Photos v. Netflix, Inc.
Earlier this week, various rightsholder groups submitted their recommendations for the 2025 Special 301 Report. The problem, however, is that copyright holders never gave permission to use it. The shadow library provided copies of several redacted emails where companies requested access. copyright protection standards.
In light of Amazon’s decision to disable the ‘Download or Transfer via USB’ feature from their Kindle devices, Arnav Kaman discusses DRMs/TPMs, the rights of the user, what users can do with their ebooks within the fairuse doctrine, and the future of ebooks in this guest post. After the 1994 amendment, S.
The license permitted the defendant to “copy, email and otherwise distribute the” forms but not post them to the web. Also curious: the court doesn’t discuss a fairuse defense at all. 2025 WL 485493 (D. 12, 2025) Want more about the Internet law of horses? Fireline Farms, Inc.
Previously, the book used to be seen in the name of the program emcee, but now, it is the opposite of that trend in America, where stricter regulations would appear to come into play. Who owns the right to copy-authors, the programmer, the user, or the transmitter commissioning the work? Federal Register. Copyright Office.
Welcome to the rollercoaster world of YouTube and copyright, where creativity collides with boundaries, and fairuse lines get blurred faster than a TikTok trend. COPY RIGHT BASICS So the good news: copyright laws were established to help protect creators. 4] FAIRUSE: THE GREY AREA Alright, let’s talk about fairuse.
Breaking Down the Controversy and IP Laws Role In It While most spent their time waiting on ChatGPT to finish generating their familys Studio Ghibli-field photographs (read Miyazaki, the creator of Studio Ghiblis thoughts on AI here ), Kunal Kamra blessed YouTube with his comedy special Naya Bharat on 26 th March 2025. In RG Anand v.
Key Legal Issues Under Sections 13 and 14 of the Copyright Act, rights for sound recordings, including adaptation, making a copy, and distribution to the public, are provided. Regardless, with respect to the other works, the use by OpenAI would seem like a direct infringement of the copyright of labels under Section 14.
We begin with a TL/DR on the NY Times article: AI was trained by copying massive amounts of content from online sources without the consent of the content owners. In 2025, forecasters predict humans will create 175 zetabytes of new data. What has changed is that creators are now directly expressing the need for consent prior to use.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content