Remove 2025 Remove Confidentiality Remove Invention
article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (February 17 – February 23)

SpicyIP

A quick glance at last week – Madras HC accepts a US District Court’s Letter Rogatory to furnish confidential information, a look at Functional Fallacies in Thomson Reuters vs Ross Intelligence and many more. on 14 February, 2025, (Delhi HC) Manash Lifestyle Pvt. The deadline to file the comments is February 28.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (February 17 – February 23)

SpicyIP

Softgel: The Errors of Comity The Madras High Court accepted a Letter Rogatory from The US District Court in Delaware directing India-based Softgel Healthcare to furnish confidential information to the US Court. on 14 February, 2025, (Delhi HC) Manash Lifestyle Pvt. Praharsh Gour writes on this order, highlighting the above omission.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

5 Proven Steps to Protect Your Intellectual Property in 2025

Traverse Legal Blog

5 Proven Steps to Protect Your Intellectual Property in 2025 In a world where ideas are currency, protecting intellectual property (IP) has ne ver been more critical. IP typically falls into the following categories: Patents : Cover inventions, processes, and designs that are new, useful, and non-obvious.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (November 25 – December 1)

SpicyIP

Navigators Logistics Ltd vs Kashif Qureshi & Ors on 20 November 2024 (Delhi HC) This case stressed the need for factual scrutiny regarding the misappropriation of confidential information and trade secrets. The Court held that in the case of a medicine that claims to cure a disease, the test of efficacy can only be therapeutic efficacy.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (April 24- April 29)

SpicyIP

Nirtech – Analysing the Claim of Breach of Confidential Information Image from here. Ex-employees using confidential information acquired from the former employer! Nirtech on protecting confidential information. US Supreme Court rejects computer scientist’s lawsuit over AI-generated inventions. Other posts Rochem v.

article thumbnail

Biosimilars 2020 Year in Review

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

The Report and Recommendation, adopted by the court, acknowledged that the parties were “legally justified” in redacting “sensitive and confidential pre-litigation material reflecting the parties’ substantive exchanges during the non-public pretrial exchanges” under the BPCIA, among other sensitive material. (17-cv-01407, 17-cv-01407, Dkt.

article thumbnail

[Part II] Public Money, Private Patents? Unravelling India’s Opacity over its COVID Vaccines

SpicyIP

He is also the co-author of three books- Create, Copy, Disrupt: Indias Intellectual Property Dilemmas (OUP, 2017), The Truth Pill: The Myth of Drug Regulation in India (Simon and Schuster India, 2022), and Tareekh Pe Justice: Reforms for Indias District Courts (Simon and Schuster India, 2025). Views expressed are those of the authors.

Patent 59