2024 Inventor IP Litigation 
IP Close Up
JANUARY 3, 2024
IP CloseUp, weekly perspective on intellectual property trends and business, broke through 392,000 views and 272,000 visits in 2023, on its way to 400,000 plus Continue reading
LexBlog IP
JANUARY 8, 2024
On January 5, 2024, in litigation between REGENXBIO and Sarepta Therapeutics, Judge Richard Andrews of the U.S. A trial was scheduled to begin on January 29, 2024. Sarepta Litigation appeared first on Big Molecule Watch. A separate, related patent lawsuit filed by REGENXBIO and Penn against Sarepta and Catalent, Inc.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
LexBlog IP
FEBRUARY 14, 2024
The USPTO released inventorship guidance on February 12, 2024, for inventions assisted by artificial intelligence (AI). The Federal Circuit previously held that an AI system cannot be listed as an inventor in Thaler v. Vidal , 43 F.4th 4th 1207 (Fed. Iolab Corp. , 3d 1344 (Fed.
The IPKat
JANUARY 12, 2024
If you, like the AmeriKat, are freezing your paws off, here is a warming drink of the latest IP news and events. AIPPI Rapid Reaction on Thaler in the Supreme Court next Thursday Next Thursday, 18 January, AIPPI UK is hosting their first event of 2024 and it's a good one - and online! before the date of the event).
IP Tech Blog
MARCH 5, 2024
The Guidance acknowledges the importance of human inventors in AI-assisted inventions, so that the patent system can continue to incentivize and reward human ingenuity. Vidal , which held that “only a natural person can be an inventor,” and consequently, that an AI system cannot assume that role. In compliance with section 5.2(c)(i)
Erik K Pelton
MAY 28, 2024
Pelton & Associates, PLLC ® (“EMP&A”), in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, published on March 26, 2024, in the Federal Register at 89 Fed. 20,897 (March 24, 2024) (“Rulemaking”). trademark prosecution, maintenance, and litigation. Since 1999, EMP&A has represented thousands of clients in U.S.
LexBlog IP
FEBRUARY 7, 2024
However, the use of AI in litigation also bears risk, as highlighted by a recent First-tier Tribunal (Tax) decision, where an appellant had sought to rely on precedent authorities that, in fact, were fabricated by AI (a known risk with AI using large language models, referred to as hallucination). [1]
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
92 
Let's personalize your content