Remove 2024 Remove Advertising Remove Service Mark
article thumbnail

TTAB Finds SOLAR CONCIERGE Merely Descriptive of, and Lacking Acquired Distinctiveness for, Guess What?

The TTABlog

The Board found the mark to be merely descriptive under Section 2(e)(1) and rejected Redden's Section 2(f) claim of acquired distinctiveness. 97299114 (July 24, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. Welch 2024. In re Dana Redden , Serial No. And so, the Board affirmed the refusal to register.

article thumbnail

"Sunflower in Lapel" for Legal Services Lacks Acquired Distinctiveness, Says TTAB

The TTABlog

97325462 (September 26, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Robert Lavache). The Board acknowledged that applicant has made some effort to use the proposed mark as a service mark, including some "look for advertising" and inclusion of the sunflower motif on business cards and applicant's website.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Faulty Specimen Sinks YACHTLY Application for Yacht Chartering Services

The TTABlog

The Board upheld this refusal to register the proposed mark YACHTLY for "yacht chartering services" because the specimens of use failed to show a direct association with the identified services. 90784139 (November 6, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Lawrence T. Welch 2024. In re Yachtly Inc.

article thumbnail

Finding MRS. COLORADO Use-less, TTAB Grants Petition for Cancellation

The TTABlog

92071814 (March 8, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Melanye K. Abundance had a license from Mrs. Patricia Dampier to use the mark MRS. COLORADO for its beauty pageant, but that license was terminated in 2015. Mere publicity about services to be rendered in the future does not lay a foundation for an application.

article thumbnail

Precedential No. 20: Supplemental Registration for PERMITS.COM Cancelled by Prior User of PERMIT.COM Despite No Acquired Distinctiveness

The TTABlog

could not prove acquired distinctiveness for its mark PERMIT.COM , it did prove first use for identical services, and that was enough. 92075095 (August 16, 2024) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. Furthermore, petitioner's sales and advertising figures were not placed in industry context. Welch 2024.

article thumbnail

Precedential No. 24: TTAB Rejects Law School Amicus Brief, Denies Partial Summary Judgment, and Tosses Out Six Affirmative Defense

The TTABlog

91284247 (September 23, 2024) [precedential]. Welch 2024. So who's the bully here? Monster Energy Company v. Herman Jones , Opposition No. With respect to the “athlete development program, namely, athlete training. Text Copyright John L.

Law 62
article thumbnail

TTABlog Test: Is UNFORGETTABLE TRIPS Confusable With UNFORGETTABLE HONEYMOONS for Travel Agency Services?

The TTABlog

Applicant argued that the cited mark is weak in view of third-party uses and registrations in the travel field, and so confusion is not likely. 90526989 (January 31, 2024) [Not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Robert H. Welch 2024. How do you think this came out? In re Brunvoll and Associates LLC , Serial No.