This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
2:22-cv-03391-SSS-PLAx, 2023 WL 5667568 (C.D. 17, 2023) Plaintiff brought the usual California statutory claims against Penuma, a penile implant/procedure, for alleged misstatements about Penuma’s safety and efficacy. International Medical Devices, Inc., Here, we deal only with the claims for injunctive relief.
4th -, 2023 WL 4189604, Nos. 27, 2023) Proceedings below most recently blogged here. Vitamins Online sued Heartwise under the Lanham Act and Utah’s Unfair Competition Law for falseadvertising about the ingredients of its competitive nutritional supplements and manipulating those products’ Amazon reviews.
19-662-CFC, 2023 WL 4561059 (D. 17, 2023) Another entry in the “courts treat Lanham Act falseadvertising very differently than Lanham Act trademark infringement, despite identical damages provisions” line. CareDx sued Natera for falseadvertising. Natera, Inc., It also found that CareDx was entitled to $21.2
Amazon is an ICS provider: Plaintiff alleges that Defendants “market” and “sell” products to retail consumers “through internet websites.” “Plaintiff does not allege that any of the products that purportedly contain falseadvertising use its marks “Planet Green” or “Doorstepink.”
2023 WL 8586681, No. 8, 2023) When does TM logic creep into falseadvertising cases? Tundra allegedly uses the information it scrapes from Faire’s platform, including contact information, to market its product. Faire Wholesale, Inc. Tundra, Inc., 23-cv-02538-JSC (N.D.
2023 WL 2918724, No. 12, 2023) Following a large verdict for Monster on falseadvertising claims, this opinion discusses extensively the requirements for injunctive relief in falseadvertising cases. Are lost prospective customers and market share purely economic harms? So too with lost market share.
BBK Tobacco & Foods, LLP, 2023 WL 3004625, No. 19, 2023) Previous discussion. Republic alleged that HBI, its competitor in the tobacco rolling paper industry, engaged in falseadvertising under the Lanham Act, unfair competition, and violations of the IUDTPA. Republic Technologies (NA), LLC v. 16 C 03401 (N.D.
2023 WL 8811499, No. 20, 2023) The court denies settlement approval in this case alleging that Macy’s misrepresented the thread count in some of the sheets it sold, because it doesn’t like the cy pres part of the remedy. You might think that class action rules can be a bit like Calvinball, and I'd be hard pressed to disagree.
2023 WL 4681569 , No. The first pegfilgrastim biosimilar hit the market in November 2018, and would ultimately be followed by five others, including Sandoz’s Ziextenzo in November 2019. These ads were based on an obseivational study Amgen conducted itself, in an effort to remain competitive with the emerging biosimilar market.
The Roundtable will be held on Friday, October 6, 2023. We invite submissions from academics working on any aspect of trademark, falseadvertising, marketing, right of publicity, or related areas of the law. The Roundtable will cover the travel and lodging expenses for invited authors.
The falseadvertising claim fails because Lops didn’t show that the videos “are commercial speech and made for the purpose of influencing consumers to buy YouTube’s goods or services.” YouTube, LLC, 2023 WL 2349597 (D. March 3, 2023). ” Lops also had an unsuccessful lawsuit against Facebook.
4th -, 2023 WL 3070085, No. 25 2023) Previous district court opinion allowing Lanham Act falseadvertising claims to proceed against Microsoft; applying the Article III analysis that doesn’t (yet?) TocMail launched its IP-evasion product, got a patent, and then sued Microsoft for falseadvertising—all within two months.”
Trademark and Unfair Competition Scholarship Roundtable 2023 The Trademark and Unfair Competition Scholarship Roundtable co-hosted by Harvard, NYU, and the University of Pennsylvania will take place in person hosted this year at NYU. The Roundtable will be held on Friday, October 6, 2023.
30, 2024) (R&R) Recommendation: Dastar should block Qingdao’s Lanham Act falseadvertising counterclaims based on Lashify’s claim to be the originator of lash technology, but false patent marking counterclaims should survive. 11, 2023 (claiming that various products were “patented”). 1, 2017 to Apr.
Eli Lilly and Company has reached a settlement with Totality Medispa , a South Carolina -based medical spa, after filing lawsuits in late 2023. Any product labeled as “tirzepatide” that is not sold by Lilly is not FDA-approved and could be dangerous.
2023 WL 8697700, No. Simpson’s structural connectors are specified on most construction drawings in the US; its market share is over 75%. All Simpson’s connectors, catalogs, marketing literature, and retail display materials, are clearly labeled with the “Simpson Strong-Tie” name. Simpson Strong-Tie Co. 20-cv-06957-VKD (N.D.
Allen Interchange LLC, 2023 WL 5206884, No. 14, 2023) This opinion deals only with Allen’s counterclaims. Lanham Act falseadvertising: Allen alleged that Toyota’s statements that “[t]he purchase. of unauthorized, gray market parts within [Toyota USA’s] PMA [Primary Market Area], or anywhere, is.
As 2023 comes to an end, in line with our annual tradition, we take stock of the top IP developments that occurred this year. We have also included a list of other notable IP developments of 2023. The judgement was passed in October 2022, but was uploaded in September 2023 on the High Court’s website. A special thanks to Mr. G.
4th -, 2023 WL 5925977, No. 12, 2023) Discussion of opinion below. Lanham Act and state unfair competition law: Although Geomatrix alleged disparagement, it failed to describe what “independent harm” occurred in the market or how defendants’ actions actually “influenc[ed] consumers’ purchasing decisions.” Geomatrix, LLC v.
2023 WL 2466624, No. 10, 2023) FedEx uses around 4500 independent contractors (ISPs) to pick up and deliver packages. The result is that FedEx routes are, as a practical matter, intangible commodities traded on a competitive market and subject to price fluctuation based on the actual or perceived value of each individual route.
2023 WL 7109914, No. Bluegreen sued a lot of entities, but only the marketing defendants remained in the case: their role was “to advertise timeshare exit services by promoting a legitimate process to exit timeshare contracts while protecting the customers’ credit.” In a particularly “yikes” bit, one marketing defendant 1990.
A couple of specifics: The falseadvertising claims don’t escape 230: “Had those third-party users refrained from posting harmful content, Plaintiffs’ claims that Defendants falselyadvertised and misrepresented their applications’ safety would not be cognizable.” Despite Doe v. Case citation : Bride v.
We usually get ours at the local farmers market.] In an April 2023 summary judgment ruling , the plaintiff established that it “possesses the legally protectable, incontestable trademarks TEXAS TAMALE and TEXAS TAMALE COMPANY.” Bye, Goff * Yet More Evidence That Keyword Advertising Lawsuits Are Stupid–Porta-Fab v.
2023 WL 8604148, No. 12, 2023) The parties are compounding pharmacies that focus on medications used in optometry and ophthalmology. This wasn’t mostly a two-player market, and the allegedly false statements did not harm the entire market. ImprimisRx, LLC v. 21-cv-01305-BAS-DDL (S.D.
2023 WL 3535386, No. May 18, 2023) New Vision, an eye-care professional and provider of optical goods and services, including contact lens fittings and contact lens sales with seven brick-and-mortar locations and two websites, brought a putative class action against four online contact-lens retailers for Lanham Act falseadvertising.
2023 WL 8292459, No. 17, 2023) Super-interesting holding that, while there’s no patent field preemption against bringing false patent marking claims under the Lanham Act, Dastar (as expansively interpreted to cover falseadvertising claims) does preclude such claims, possibly only because of party argument.
2023 WL 2433970, -- F. 9, 2023) Roblox runs a “digital world where users create virtual games and experiences and connect with other users.” Defendants allegedly marketed the My Avastars dolls with a “code” that could be used in the Roblox platform. Roblox Corp. 22-cv-04476-SI (N.D.
2023 WL 3340214 (W.D. May 10, 2023) More Posts About Keyword Advertising * Yet More Evidence That Keyword Advertising Lawsuits Are Stupid–Porta-Fab v. Allied Modular * Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute FalseAdvertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet Bye, Goff appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
CrossCountry Mortgage, LLC, 2023 WL 9022893, No. 29, 2023) loanDepot alleged that CCM, its chief competitor, “improperly poached” 32 employees, and CCM and various former employees. The false association/coordinate state law claims survived. The false association/coordinate state law claims survived. LoanDepot.com, LLC v.
2023 WL 4947974, No. 2, 2023) A smoothly written opinion: As the complaint tells it, Paul Mitchell has long marketed its business and its products as “cruelty-free.” The 2012 PETA press release comes closer, but it commends Paul Mitchell for choosing to “pull out of the Chinese market entirely than hurt even one animal.”
” Misrepresentations The plaintiffs claim Snapchat falselyadvertised procedures to report threats. The plaintiffs claim Snapchat falselyadvertised it works with law enforcement. 3, 2023) The post Snapchat Defeats Lawsuit Over User-to-User Harassment–Ziencik v. Case Citation : Ziencik v.
2023 WL 139714, No. 9, 2023) Along with updating its previous decision (I didn’t see anything that affected the Lanham Act analysis of the key issue of whether a retailer can sue a supplier for falseadvertising), the court addressed a motion to dismiss by defendant ViaClean. AHBP LLC v. SA-22-CV-00096-XR (W.D.
Nursing CE Central” is a descriptive mark with “a weak secondary meaning… the plaintiff makes no meaningful showing that the public, or even those in the market in which it competes, readily recognizes its name.” ” Marketing channel. Colibri Healthcare, LLC , 2023 WL 5493530 (E.D. Mark similarity.
LLC, 2023 WL 3066119, No. 24, 2023) “This case arises out of alleged misuse of copyrighted images, eventually leading to a dispute … that resulted in false business reviews, malicious e-mails, and mutual efforts to interfere with each other’s business.” The “most important” factor was market effect, and there was none.
Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liab. 2023 WL 8006602, MDL No. 17, 2023) Because this is MDL with lots of claims, the facts are a bit complicated. And, they continued, SoClean was illegally marketing its devices. Commercial advertising or promotion: A separate problem. In re SoClean, Inc., 22-542 (W.D.
of exposed consumers experienced actual confusion: This tiny percentage cannot reasonably be said to constitute an “appreciable” or “significant” number of consumers confused by Defendants’ advertising strategy. Nor can it be said to show that Defendants’ marketing strategy made confusion likely. Brown Engstrand & Shely LLC , No.
For background on the legal battles over keyword advertising by lawyers, see this article. McNeil Consultants LLC, 2023 WL 5600128 (N.D. July 27, 2023). More Posts About Keyword Advertising * Court Denies Injunction in Competitive Keyword Ad Lawsuit–Nursing CE Central v. Case citation : Jim S. Adler PC v. LoanStreet v.
2023) Acuity operates a website that connects people looking to buy or sell homes with a local real-estate agent in their area. Lewis didn’t allege that his payment of this referral fee injured his status in the realtor market in any way. Acuity Real Estate Services, LLC, 63 F.4th 4th 1114 (6 th Cir.
And then…the Ninth Circuit got the case again… The Majority Opinion After the Supreme Court cert denial, the district court ruled that Malwarebytes’ “malicious” and “threat” classifications were “non-actionable statements of opinion” and thus could not support a Lanham Act falseadvertising claim.
2023 WL 1797266, No. 7, 2023) Navatar sued for state and federal falseadvertising, as well as commercial defamation, injurious falsehoods, unfair competition. The “touchstone” is “that the contested representations are part of an organized campaign to penetrate the relevant market. Navatar Group, Inc.
2023 WL 5000434, No. 4, 2023) Akes brought the usual California claims /unjust enrichment, alleging that she was misled by the labeling of the 2.5-ounce Beiersdorf, Inc., 3:22-cv-869 (JBA) (D.
Red Points Solutions SL, 2023 WL 4029824, No. 14, 2023) Unlimited, an “online non-authorized reseller of consumer products,” sued Red Points for defamation, tortious interference, and falseadvertising under state and federal law. Lanham Act falseadvertising: Unlimited sufficiently pled standing.
That’s certainly true for high-profile and well-advertised consumer items like fast food chains, mass-market phones, and major car labels, but is it true in this particular niche? 2023 WL 9051998 (E.D. 28, 2023) More Posts About Keyword Advertising * When Do Inbound Call Logs Show Consumer Confusion?–Adler
.” That wasn’t the case here: “Google did nothing to make the content of the advertisement itself more unlawful.” ” The court summarizes: “it is plain that Section 230 protects Google from liability in the negligence and falseadvertising action brought by Mr. Ynfante.”
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content