The IP Law Blog

DECEMBER 29, 2023

As we look back, we want to share The Briefing’s most popular episodes in 2023. 3: What Now for Fair Use After Warhol v. Goldsmith that Andy Warhol’s portrait of music legend Prince did not qualify as fair use under copyright law. Goldsmith The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Andy Warhol Foundation v.

False Advertising 62

False Advertising Intellectual Property Fair Use Music 62

Erik K Pelton

DECEMBER 20, 2022

which will determine the scope of the Lanham Act as applied to trademark infringement that occurs outside the US. The Court has also agreed to hear a patent case this term, and it will rule on a copyright fair-use case brought by the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts that was heard this fall. Queen of Christmas.

Trademark 130

Trademark Non-Fungible Tokens All Rights Reserved False Advertising 130

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JUNE 8, 2024

In an April 2023 summary judgment ruling , the plaintiff established that it “possesses the legally protectable, incontestable trademarks TEXAS TAMALE and TEXAS TAMALE COMPANY.” Brown Engstrand * More on Law Firms and Competitive Keyword Ads–Nicolet Law v. Yum, and easily veganized. ” Say what?

Trademark 101

Trademark Advertising Advertising False Advertising 101

43(B)log

MAY 22, 2023

2023 WL 3556053, No. May 19, 2023) Whereas the timeshare false advertising cases might be making law largely applicable to other timeshare cases, what’s going on in the strip club advertising cases might have somewhat broader implications. Exotic Island Enters., 21-2149-cv, F.4th 4th - (2d Cir.

False Advertising 49

False Advertising Social Media Advertising Advertising 49

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 30, 2023

As 2023 comes to an end, in line with our annual tradition, we take stock of the top IP developments that occurred this year. We have also included a list of other notable IP developments of 2023. The judgement was passed in October 2022, but was uploaded in September 2023 on the High Court’s website. A special thanks to Mr. G.

IP 112

IP Copyright Trademark Intellectual Property 112

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 1, 2023

VIP Products, on the other hand, argued that their toy was protected under the doctrine of “fair use” as it was being used in a non-trademark sense, and that it was not likely to cause confusion among consumers. ” Id. In VIP Products v. Jack Daniels Products , 953 F.3d 3d 1170 , 1172 (9 th Cir.

Trademark 52

Trademark Intellectual Property Branding Brands 52