This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
19-662-CFC, 2023 WL 4561059 (D. 17, 2023) Another entry in the “courts treat Lanham Act falseadvertising very differently than Lanham Act trademark infringement, despite identical damages provisions” line. CareDx sued Natera for falseadvertising. Natera, Inc., It also found that CareDx was entitled to $21.2
Meadow Gold Dairies Hawaii, LLC, 2023 WL 159907, No. 11, 2023) Plaintiff alleged that defendant MGD advertises and sells milk that is one hundred percent from cows outside of Hawai‘i. Was a false geographic origin claim one for false association, § 1125(a)(1)(A), or falseadvertising, § 1125(a)(1)(B)?
The court simply responds: “the Ninth Circuit has held that Section 230 immunity applies to falseadvertising claims and other claims that are based on purportedly false representations.” This argument has failed so many times. See, e.g., the cited Ynfante v. Google opinion. ” Cites to Perfect 10 v.
The Roundtable is designed to be a forum for the discussion of current trademark and right of publicity scholarship, covering a range of methodologies, topics, and perspectives. The Roundtable will be held on Friday, October 6, 2023. The Roundtable will cover the travel and lodging expenses for invited authors.
Trademark and Unfair Competition Scholarship Roundtable 2023 The Trademark and Unfair Competition Scholarship Roundtable co-hosted by Harvard, NYU, and the University of Pennsylvania will take place in person hosted this year at NYU. The Roundtable will be held on Friday, October 6, 2023.
Although the court dismissed a contract claim, copyright and falseadvertising claims survived. And they allegedly copied golf courses created on Perfect Golf’s course design platform. Eventually, in 2023, the trademark owners of the St. Andrews and various PGA Tour courses. 3d 1137 (9th Cir.
As 2023 comes to an end, in line with our annual tradition, we take stock of the top IP developments that occurred this year. We have also included a list of other notable IP developments of 2023. The judgement was passed in October 2022, but was uploaded in September 2023 on the High Court’s website. A special thanks to Mr. G.
2023 WL 4681569 , No. Injury: Damages and disgorgement under the Lanham Act require injury (for falseadvertising, not trademark infringement, despite the same statutory language covering both; no, I am not going to stop pointing this out any time soon). Sandoz Inc. 2:22-cv-05326-RGK-MARx (C.D.
Lei, 2023 WL 6373073, No. 21, 2023) Deetsch alleged that he owned design patents for CPAP pillow products, which the Lei defendants infringed. Since the designs were not plainly dissimilar, infringement was plausible. Since the designs were not plainly dissimilar, infringement was plausible.
2023 WL 8697700, No. The engineer of record must indicate on construction drawings the specific structural connectors that will be used on a given project, whether a custom connector designed by the engineer to join and transfer the load between members or a pre-engineered connector. Simpson Strong-Tie Co. 20-cv-06957-VKD (N.D.
3d -, 2023 WL 371035, No. 24, 2023) WS sued Wayfair, alleging patent infringement, Lanham Act falseadvertising, Massachusetts and California statutory unfair competition and Massachusetts falseadvertising based on alleged copying of West Elm products. Wayfair Inc., 1:21-12063-PBS (D.
LLC, 2023 WL 5229803, No. 15, 2023) Lokring sells fittings for pipes and other transfer systems for fluids and gases, as well as tools used to install them. Its head of product development testified that the thin cross section had, as designed, worked acceptably for over 25 years. Shepard & Assoc., Lokring Tech.,
LLC, 2023 WL 2933464, No. 13, 2023) I don’t usually blog default cases because there’s usually little legal analysis; this case is an exception around the fraught area of first sale, showing unusual diligence by the court. Quincy Bioscience, LLC v. BRYK Enters., 22-cv-658-jdp (W.D. Even after default.
Despite the rhetorical moves to position the lawsuit about the defendants’ design choices, this is actually an easy case. Meanwhile, the battle is raging in the MDL, the recent lawsuits brought by school districts over teens’ social media addiction, other lawsuits, and the panoply of state bills that will be introduced in 2023.
2023 WL 8634803, No. 13, 2023) Vericool alleged that Igloo falsely claimed that its “Recool” biodegradable cooler was the first of its kind. were not designed to protect originality or creativity.” “Yet Vericool World LLC v. Igloo Prods. 22-cv-02440-HSG (N.D.
2023 WL 2433970, -- F. 9, 2023) Roblox runs a “digital world where users create virtual games and experiences and connect with other users.” Roblox Corp. 22-cv-04476-SI (N.D. Users interact with the platform through virtual characters known as “Avatars.”
4th -, 2023 WL 2621131, No. 24, 2023) Courts in particular kinds of falseadvertising cases say that scientific claims are not falsifiable, even as the majority of workaday falseadvertising claims involving scientific fact are (correctly) treated as falsifiable. Pacira Biosciences, Inc. 22-1411 (3d Cir.
Allen Interchange LLC, 2023 WL 5206884, No. 14, 2023) This opinion deals only with Allen’s counterclaims. The Toyota parts sold by Allen Interchange and Toyota bear the same part number, and according to Allen Interchange, are identical in design, function, and quality. Allen Interchange LLC, 2023 WL 5207389, No.
2023 WL 6318083, No. 28, 2023) Sazerac sells a malt version of its famous Southern Comfort whiskey. Plaintiff alleged that Sazerac designed this malt version to look just like the original one, misleading consumers in violation of New York laws on deceptive practices and falseadvertising. Del Rosario v.
Design Gaps, Inc. Hall, 2023 WL 8103156, No. 21, 2023) Design Gaps produces custom cabinetry for high-end homes; Hall is a former employee of Design Gaps who signed a nonsolicitation/noncompete clause but went to work for a design studio that was part of Design Gaps’ main competition, Peters.
2023 WL 7390842, No. 8, 2023) Imprimis sued defendants, competitors in the compounding pharmacy industry, for falseadvertising, trademark and copyright infringement, and related claims. It alleged that defendants falselyadvertised that they’re in compliance with Section 503A of the FDCA, governing compounding.
2023 WL 416080, No. Falseadvertising: Spiralverse allegedly falselyadvertised its version of the Piano Book on Amazon as “new,” despite the rebinding, residue, and front labels. Was this literally false? Steeplechase Arts & Productions, L.L.C. Wisdom Paths, Inc., 22-02031 (KM)(MAH) (D.N.J.
2023 WL 5000434, No. 4, 2023) Akes brought the usual California claims /unjust enrichment, alleging that she was misled by the labeling of the 2.5-ounce ounce bottle of Coppertone Sport Mineral sunscreen as “Face 50” to believe that it was “specifically designed” or “specifically formulated” “for use on the face.”
To Be or Not To Be (Design): Calcutta HC Sways Against Trend of Denying Design Registrations Over GUIs Image from here Can a GUI be regarded as a Design? In what follows, Rahul Bajaj sets out the key arguments of the parties and the holding of the court, along with his analysis of the judgment. 2 (Lulu Mall).
22-cv-03119-PCP, 2023 WL 6284738, F.Supp.3d 27, 2023) HomeLight runs an online platform that matches real estate agents with homebuyers and sellers and requires any agent who accepts a referral resulting in a sale to pay 25% of their commission to HomeLight. I will only discuss the (unsuccessful) advertising-related claims.
Salinas, 2023 WL 2026546, No. 15, 2023) Defendants allegedly sold non-rescue dogs as rescue dogs. Lanham Act falseadvertising: Gonzalez lacked statutory standing. The trier of fact would have to resolve this; there was no dispute that the cage cards were in advertising format and about the puppies for sale. “To
Crawlspace Ninja IP LLC, 2023 WL 2533061, No. 15, 2023) When is informational material related to a for-profit company’s business commercial speech? 5:22-cv-649-LCB (N.D. Here, the court finds a YouTube video noncommercial despite some reasonably solid connections to profit-seeking.
3d -, 2023 WL 4463246, No. 11, 2023) The parties compete in the design of buckling-restrained braces, which are structural devices that help buildings withstand seismic activity. The Design Manual also included several technical drawings of BRBs, which allegedly infringed plaintiff Core-Brace’s registered drawings.
2023 WL 3046592, No. 21, 2023) In two opinions on the same day, the court dealt with various IP/falseadvertising claims brought by one litter box seller against another. 2023 WL 3049106, No. effective at eliminating viruses and bacteria was also plausibly falseadvertising. Automated Pet Care Prods.,
” I agree 100%, and this line seems relevant to the court challenges to the age-appropriate design codes as applied to UGC publishers (and many other pending attempts to work around Section 230). ” That wasn’t the case here: “Google did nothing to make the content of the advertisement itself more unlawful.”
16-6576 (KM) (MAH), 2023 WL 4200169, -- F. 27, 2023) Industria sued Latinfood for trademark and copyright infringement; Latinfood counterclaimed for tortious interference against Industria and another counterdefendant Cordialsa. Industria De Alimentos Zenu S.A.S. Latinfood U.S. T]he one showed in the application is not mine.”
EDCV 22-1861 JGB (KKx), 2023 WL 2629020 (C.D. 9, 2023) Hernandez brought the usual California claims against RSC for allegedly false and misleading advertising of its electric collar products for pets under the brand name PetSafe. It is designed to get your pet’s attention, but not punish him. Hernandez v.
2023 WL 9051998, No. 28, 2023) Penn Engineering designs and manufactures various types of fasteners sold under various trademarks, and alleged that Peninsula sold identical fasteners while infringing on Penn Engineering’s marks. Penn Engineering also made falseadvertising claims based on Peninsula’s use of sales drawings.
In fall 2023, Overjet launched its “Anatomical Structures Visualization Tool” for Overjet Caries Assist, which introduced the relevant coloring scheme and design. It also allegedly “selected the design and colors to help with brand identification; the purple, for example, complements Overjet’s purple brand color.” Overjet, Inc.
2023 WL 137478, No. 9, 2023) Simpson sued MiTek for Lanham Act and state law falseadvertising/passing off, and for copyright infringement. For falseadvertising, the control group respondents were exposed to the same four MiTek stimuli but with the reference numbers removed. Simpson Strong-Tie Co.
2023 WL 2364736, No. 24, 2023) Hey, it’s a certified class in a vanilla case: Vizcarra alleged that Breyers Natural Vanilla Ice Cream misleadingly communicated that it contained vanilla flavor derived exclusively from the vanilla plant. Vizcarra v. Unilever U.S., 4:20-cv-02777 YGR (N.D.
10, 2023) Nike sued over StockX’s use of Nike trademarks on StockX NFTs without Nike’s consent and alleged sales of counterfeit Nike sneakers despite allegedly guaranteeing that all products sold by StockX were authentic. Nike, Inc. StockX LLC, 2024 WL 3361411, No. 22-CV-0983 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y.
2, 2023) Courts generally seem more likely to find falsifiability instead of puffery when a speaker makes negative claims about rivals rather than positive claims about itself. The district court dismissed the complaint on the grounds that these designations were “non-actionable statements of opinion.” Malwarebytes, Inc., collectively.”
2023 WL 3195941, No. May 2, 2023) Interesting discussion of the way in which the objective reasonable consumer standard allows consumers classes to bring certain probabilistic claims, where some consumers might have different interpretations, although the court ultimately denies certification because of damages/price premium issues.
2023 WL 122910, No. 6, 2023) Norman sued Gerber for allegedly falselyadvertising its baby food/infant formula products as “NON GMO Not Made With Genetically Engineered Ingredients” on the front of the package, and also on the back above the ingredients list. Gerber Prods. 21-cv-09940-JSW (N.D.
3d -, 2023 WL 1438718, No. 1, 2023) The FTC, joined by California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, and New York, sued Roomster, an internet-based room and roommate finder platform, and related individuals. NY’s laws are territorial, prohibiting deceptive acts or falseadvertising conduct “in this state.”
3:23-CV-863-NJR, 2023 WL 8108547 (S.D. 17, 2023) “This case pits real lawyers against a robot lawyer.” MillerKing, a small Chicago law firm that claims to be a direct competitor of DNP, sued DNP for false association and falseadvertising under the Lanham Act and Illinois state law. MillerKing, LLC v.
San Marzano tomatoes “bear a special designation: D.O.P. Denominazione d’Origine Protetta, ‘Protected Designation of Origin’).” designation but are labeled “San Marzano style” or “San Marzano” without the D.O.P designation. San Marzano tomatoes grown in the United States do not have the D.O.P. Benefit Corp.,
2023 WL 8006602, MDL No. 17, 2023) Because this is MDL with lots of claims, the facts are a bit complicated. It alleged that the Philips defendants, who make such devices, engaged in falseadvertising about one of SoClean’s devices in order to deflect blame for the Philips devices’ design defects. 22-542 (W.D.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content