This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Defendants allegedly copied key components of Trackman’s copyrighted software and falsely suggested, in promotions and advertisements, that defendants were authorized to use the well-known courses in their game. Although the court dismissed a contract claim, copyright and falseadvertising claims survived.
2023 WL 2918724, No. 12, 2023) Following a large verdict for Monster on falseadvertising claims, this opinion discusses extensively the requirements for injunctive relief in falseadvertising cases. But Defendants have brought on themselves these unfortunate consequences through their falseadvertising.”
2023 WL 2466624, No. 10, 2023) FedEx uses around 4500 independent contractors (ISPs) to pick up and deliver packages. As alleged, Each ISP’s contract grants it a certain service area, or “route,” and the ISP is permitted to sell its route to another entity if they can agree on terms. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
2023 WL 2433970, -- F. 9, 2023) Roblox runs a “digital world where users create virtual games and experiences and connect with other users.” more images from the complaint Interestingly, the contract/tortious interference claims against US resident defendants had to be arbitrated because of Roblox's own TOS. Roblox Corp.
As 2023 comes to an end, in line with our annual tradition, we take stock of the top IP developments that occurred this year. We have also included a list of other notable IP developments of 2023. The judgement was passed in October 2022, but was uploaded in September 2023 on the High Court’s website. A special thanks to Mr. G.
CrossCountry Mortgage, LLC, 2023 WL 9022893, No. 29, 2023) loanDepot alleged that CCM, its chief competitor, “improperly poached” 32 employees, and CCM and various former employees. The false association/coordinate state law claims survived. LoanDepot.com, LLC v. 22-cv-5971 (AS) (S.D.N.Y. Dismissed without prejudice.
2023 WL 7109914, No. Bluegreen sued a lot of entities, but only the marketing defendants remained in the case: their role was “to advertise timeshare exit services by promoting a legitimate process to exit timeshare contracts while protecting the customers’ credit.” Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc. Timeshare Lawyers P.A.,
Heuberger, 2023 WL 5334192, No. 18, 2023) (magistrate) Route is a package tracking company that provides shipping insurance to e-commerce merchants. The breach of contract claim survived. Falseadvertising: The comments about Route were opinion and not actionable under the Lanham Act. Route App, Inc.
3d -, 2023 WL 2720805, No. 30, 2023) This is fallout from one of the many right of publicity etc. lawsuits against clubs for advertising them with images of models without those models’ consent. Covington Specialty Insurance Company v. Omega Restaurant & Bar, LLC, F.Supp.3d 2:21-cv-247 (E.D.
Despite various marks and online statements claiming that CLP is a law firm, it is [allegedly] actually a legal referral service that matches customers in need of legal services to attorneys that CLP contracts with. CLP allegedly launched a Google advertising campaign using the mark CAPE LAW FIRM.
2023 WL 6373871, No. 16, 2023) DealMaker is a financial technology company that provides its users with the ability to raise capital by conducting investment offerings via its online platform. DealMaker alleged that defendants stole its trade secrets and also alleged violation of state and federal falseadvertising law.
4th -, 2023 WL 4504183, No. 13, 2023) Winder, a generic pharma manufacturer, sought insurance coverage for a falseadvertising lawsuit. Winder argued that Concordia’s complaint alleged a “personal and advertising injury” because it included allegations that Winder copied Concordia’s DONNATAL label inserts.
2, 2023) Courts generally seem more likely to find falsifiability instead of puffery when a speaker makes negative claims about rivals rather than positive claims about itself. USA, LLC v. Malwarebytes, Inc., 21-16466 (9th Cir. Enigma alleged that its software products “(i) detect and remove malicious software (i.e., USA, LLC v.
3:23-CV-863-NJR, 2023 WL 8108547 (S.D. 17, 2023) “This case pits real lawyers against a robot lawyer.” MillerKing, a small Chicago law firm that claims to be a direct competitor of DNP, sued DNP for false association and falseadvertising under the Lanham Act and Illinois state law. MillerKing, LLC v.
Defendants counterclaimed for payment and damages for breach of contract and bad faith. Under Rhode Island law, policy exclusions must be unambiguous, and ‘contract provisions subject to more than one interpretation are construed strictly against the insurer.’” 2023); but see Princeton Express v. Houston, Inc., 4th 274 (5th Cir.
In fall 2023, Overjet launched its “Anatomical Structures Visualization Tool” for Overjet Caries Assist, which introduced the relevant coloring scheme and design. For (1): In a now-deleted LinkedIn post from December 2023, Videa stated, “[h]ear from the clinicians who are experiencing firsthand VideaAI’s transformative power.” [The
2023 WL 2712390, F.Supp.3d 30, 2023) Peck bought stacked uninsured/underinsured motorist (“UM/UIM”) coverage on a single vehicle policy. Progressive Northern Ins. 1:22-cv-00490-KWR-JFR (D.N.M. Stacked UM/UIM coverage permits an insured to aggregate the UM/UIM coverages on all vehicles insured under a policy.
Young Living Essential Oils, LC, 2023 WL 3185045, No. May 2, 2023) In 2020, NAD found that Young Living’s claims that its essential oils are “therapeutic-grade” and impart physical and/or mental health benefits were “unsupported.” MacNaughton v. 22-0344, -- F.4th 4th -- (2d Cir.
3d -, 2023 WL 7590798, No. The complaint alleged causes of action for UCL fraudulent and unfair business practices; breach of contract; and “unjust enrichment.” Sepanossian v. National Ready Mix Co., B319260 (Ct. The court of appeals reversed a dismissal of the UCL claims, but affirmed on unjust enrichment.
3d -, 2023 WL 3142311, No. 21, 2023) ExeGi sued Brookfield for state and federal falseadvertising/tortious interference. These communications were more than “purely negotiation of individual contracts, but rather encompass a variety of media through which Brookfield represented information about HPP.”
29, 2024) Previously, after a bench trial, the court found Albion liable for falselyadvertising its caulk dispensing guns as “Made in the USA.” After more evidence, the court found that Albion adequately supported its unclean-hands defense—that Newborn had also made false USA origin claims—until early 2007. Newborn Bros.
Amazon.com, 2023 WL 2538706, No. 16, 2023) Plaintiffs alleged they bought and used Solimo, a melatonin supplement manufactured and sold by Amazon. Plaintiffs alleged that Solimo falsely substantially understates Solimo’s true melatonin dosage in each serving, exceeding what would be a “reasonable excess” allowed by the FDA.
25, 2023) Plaintiffs alleged that Burger King, through its advertisements and in-store ordering boards, “materially overstates” the size of (and the amount of beef contained in) many of its burgers and sandwiches. Breach of contract: Burger King argued that its ads weren’t binding offers. Burger King Corp.,
Apple, Inc, 2023 WL 2585888, No. 21, 2023) Plaintiffs alleged that Apple made false representations when it “sold” them digital content on the iTunes Store only to later remove their access to that same digital content. 21-CV-1133-LJV (W.D.N.Y.
GCU isn’t permitted to contract with any third party for these services. 2023) (“[A]lthough the FTC’s powers may have changed since Humphrey’s Executor was decided, the question of whether the FTC’s authority has changed so fundamentally as to render Humphrey’s Executor no longer binding is for the Supreme Court, not us, to answer.”).
Yodice alleged breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and consumer protection falseadvertising claims. It likewise remanded for further consideration of the GBL falseadvertising claims. It likewise remanded for further consideration of the GBL falseadvertising claims. In Goldberg v. Pace Univ.,
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content