This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
As 2023 commences, it’s time for companies to review and take stock of their intellectual property assets. This applies to companies that have never taken serious steps to protect intellectual property and companies that understand the value of intellectual property and take active steps to secure and protect those assets. .
On June 8, 2023, the Supreme Court in a unanimous decision held that a trademark claim concerning “a squeaky, chewable dog toy designed to look like a bottle of Jack Daniels whiskey” which, as a play on words, turns the words “Jack Daniels” into “Bad Spaniels” and the descriptive phrase “Old No. 2023) (slip op., 2] Rogers v.
How to prevent: Seek help from a trademark attorney, who has a deep knowledge of Indian TrademarkLaws. When such a situation arises, do what you can to protect your brand; whether that means taking the matter before a judge or sending out cease and desist letters.
On June 8, 2023, the United States Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of Jack Daniels in the case of Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. Jack Daniels sent a cease and desist letter to VIP shortly after the product launched. ’ And because of this, “trademarks are often expressive, in any number of ways.”
To be eligible for trademark protection, the mark must be distinctive, non-generic, and not already in use by another party. Learn more about distinctive trademarks. Common trademark violations Navigating the waters of trademarklaws can sometimes feel like you’re trying to solve a puzzle blindfolded—confusing, right?
But although this phrase is used by many, two restaurant companies actually own TACO TUESDAY trademark registrations that they can assert as conclusive evidence of their exclusive rights to use the slogan and enforce those rights against anyone who tries to use the mark. Taco Bell is seeking to change that. The Lanham Act, which governs U.S.
On June 8, 2023, the Supreme Court in a unanimous decision held that a trademark claim concerning “a squeaky, chewable dog toy designed to look like a bottle of Jack Daniels whiskey” which, as a play on words, turns the words “Jack Daniels” into “Bad Spaniels” and the descriptive phrase “Old No.
On June 8, 2023, the Supreme Court in a unanimous decision held that a trademark claim concerning “a squeaky, chewable dog toy designed to look like a bottle of Jack Daniels whiskey” which, as a play on words, turns the words “Jack Daniels” into “Bad Spaniels” and the descriptive phrase “Old No.
Can “honest concurrent use” be used as a defense against a trademark infringement claim? Lokesh, highlighting its history, argues that honest concurrent use is a principle of trademarklaw and is not limited to a provision. Delhi High Court Imposes Costs worth INR 2 Cr. on Triveni Interchem Pvt.
.” Most of the opinion discusses the trademark implications of Ripps’ rival NFT collection. With that framing, trademarklaw protects against the unwanted competition, and the court treats this as an easy rightsowner win. Never has, never will. Case citation : Yuga Labs, Inc. Ripps , CV 22-4355-JFW(JEMx) (C.D.
The judgment of the Provincial Court of Alicante, dated 20 January 2025, overturned the earlier decision of the EU Trademark Court of First Instance of 25 October 2023. The lower court had dismissed the trademark infringement claims but upheld the unfair competition claim based on acts of confusion.
Read Yogesh Byadwal’s post explaining what the case is about and how the court interpreted “technical effect” Playing from a “Safe Distance”: Analysing the Rule, its Roots and Application in India Image by wirestock on Freepik What is the “Safe Distance” rule in trademarklaw and how does it apply?
Ramsey is a Professor of Law at the University of San Diego School of Law. She writes and teaches in the trademarklaw area, and recently wrote a paper with Professor Christine Haight Farley that focuses on speech-protective doctrines in trademark infringement law.] By Guest Blogger Lisa P. Ramsey [Lisa P.
Elster and held oral argument on November 1, 2023, most commentators believe—like me —that the Court will reverse the Federal Circuit and hold that Section 2(c) is consistent with the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment on its face and as applied to Elster’s trademark application. After the Supreme Court granted cert in Vidal v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content