Remove 2022 Remove False Advertising Remove Social Media Remove Trademark Law
article thumbnail

Trademark law and LinkedIn resumes: watch out?

43(B)log

Maybe companies can resurrect noncompetes by prohibiting uses of their trademarks in former employees’ resumes! Portkey sued for unfair competition/reverse passing off, false advertising, and trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, as well as related state-law claims. Venkateswaran, 2024 WL 3487735, No.

article thumbnail

using an ITU to get non-Amazon platforms to take down competitors

43(B)log

2:21-cv-07929-MEMF(PVCx), 2022 WL 18674459 (C.D. 22, 2022) This is a super messy case with a lot going on; I’m going to blog about it mainly to highlight a new thing you can apparently do with a trademark application , which is use it on non-Amazon platforms to gain advantages. Hollywood Unlocked, Inc.,

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

influencers aren't advertisers' agents, materiality can be common sense, & more in supplement case

43(B)log

11, 2022) This is the main liability opinion. A whole industry exists of social media influencers, who create their own content touting products and receive commission on sales of those products that stem from their advertising. Thus, any false advertising claim would lie against Albaum, not [directly] against ChromaDex.

article thumbnail

11th Circuit affirms Viacom's Rogers-based win for MTV Floribama Shore

43(B)log

29, 2022) MGFB runs the Flora-Bama Lounge, Package and Oyster Bar on the Florida-Alabama border. An online article used photos of the Lounge in its coverage of the series, and MGFB also submitted social media posts. This justification is at least consistent with the core idea of trademark law. Viacom Inc, No.

article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2023

SpicyIP

The judgement was passed in October 2022, but was uploaded in September 2023 on the High Court’s website. Further, the judgement also sets aside the 4 factor test in the 2022 Nokia v. Bolt Technology v. First, in Toyota v. d) Other IP Developments 1.

IP 112