This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
12, 2023) Following a large verdict for Monster on falseadvertising claims, this opinion discusses extensively the requirements for injunctive relief in falseadvertising cases. Plus, they hadn’t removed existing falseadvertising from their socialmedia accounts. and] expects to complete.
2022 WL 141561, No. 14, 2022) Once in a blue moon, a falseadvertising-based antitrust claim survives a motion to dismiss in a circuit that imposes a list of excessive requirements on such claims. Facebook, Inc., 20-CV-08570-LHK (N.D. That time has come for Facebook.
Given that the artists refused to take action and continued to benefit from the socialmedia posts, Vogue requested and was granted immediate injunctive relief to prevent Drake and 21 Savage from using fake covers to promote their album.
If the clinic is falsely claiming that he is, that’s falseadvertising and possibly defamation. Potential irony alert: 50 Cent has taunted Diddy for getting botox … When, if ever, can a company share a photo of a customer/friend on socialmedia without consent? Kogan , 2022 WL 17582560 (S.D.
2:21-cv-07929-MEMF(PVCx), 2022 WL 18674459 (C.D. 22, 2022) This is a super messy case with a lot going on; I’m going to blog about it mainly to highlight a new thing you can apparently do with a trademark application , which is use it on non-Amazon platforms to gain advantages. Hollywood Unlocked, Inc.,
WGACA, LLC, 2022 WL 902931, No. 28, 2022) Chanel sued What Goes Around Comes Around (WGACA), alleging trademark infringement, falseadvertising, false association/endorsement, and related NY GBL claims for deceptive/unfair trade practices and falseadvertising. Chanel, Inc. 2253 (LLS) (S.D.N.Y.
Portkey sued for unfair competition/reverse passing off, falseadvertising, and trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, as well as related state-law claims. In 2022, the relationship dissolved; Portkey objected to Venkateswaran’s alleged references to Portkey and its asserted trademarks since 2022.
JC Penny, for example, has been hit with a class action lawsuit in the Southern District of California over its alleged advertising practice of using “false reference pricing.” Carranza claims that JC Penny falselyadvertises its products on its e-commerce website by listing a high reference price and the corresponding sale price.
It’s 2022 and we’re still dealing with this s**t. May 13, 2022). Aciper, 2022 WL 992888 (S.D.N.Y. 2022 WL 1316222 (W.D. April 28, 2022): “That confusion has been amplified by Block’s public communications and worsened by third parties who have, and will likely continue, to link Block, Inc.
The parties had other disputes, including accusing each other of posting false reviews of the other. IDT removed its “Made in USA” advertising in the first 8 months of 2022, and its on-line sales increased during that time period. There’s more, including public disputes on Craigslist.
The case was brought by Lavinia Deborah Osbourne (founder of Women in Blockchain Talks) against Ozone Networks (trading as OpenSea) in January 2022, after two NFT artworks that she had purchased from the Boss Beauties collection were taken from her digital wallet without her consent.
2022 WL 17218077, No. 2, 2022) Before the jury verdict in favor of Monster’s falseadvertising claim was this opinion resolving evidentiary issues. However, they fail to show that Monster dirtied its hands to make the falseadvertising claims now alleged against Defendants.” Monster Energy Co.
2022 WL 1599712, No. 19, 2022) The parties compete in the market for energy drinks. Monster alleged that VPX falselyadvertised Super Creatine as a source of creatine providing numerous physical and mental benefits, advertising that BANG can improve brain function, has anti-depressive effects, and helps build muscle.
Tito & Tita Food Truck, LLC, 2022 WL 622234, No. 3, 2022) Plaintiffs alleged that they employed the individual defendants in part to manage socialmediaadvertising and promotion for plaintiffs’ baking businesses, aka La Baguette. Pan 4 America, LLC v. DLB-21-401 (D.
19-11461-PBS, 2022 WL 4630231, F.Supp.3d 30, 2022) Pegasystems alleged that defendants, which compete with it in the business process management (BPM) software field, engaged in falseadvertising and commercial disparagement in an online report that portrayed Pegasystems unfavorably. Pegasystems Inc. Appian Corp.
20, 2022) Plaintiffs rented Yesterday on Amazon, allegedly in reliance on the trailer, which contained a scene/subplot that ultimately never appeared in the final movie featuring famous actress Ana De Armas. Although expressing some skepticism, the court found that they stated a valid falseadvertising claim.
11, 2022) This is the main liability opinion. A whole industry exists of socialmedia influencers, who create their own content touting products and receive commission on sales of those products that stem from their advertising. Thus, any falseadvertising claim would lie against Albaum, not [directly] against ChromaDex.
NFT background: In early 2022, StockX introduced Vault NFTs, which featured Nike’s trademarks and provided the holder ownership of an associated physical item. As for the positivity of the ads, “consumer surveys in falseadvertising cases commonly display the challenged advertisement.”
Broidy, 2022 WL 793029, No. 4, 2022) Mosafer, a travel business that “aligns its branding with the State of Qatar,” sued several defendants for making public statements allegedly disparaging the State of Qatar and harming the Mosafer parties’ brand, which is closely aligned with the country. Mosafer Inc. 2:21-cv-06320-MCS-JC (C.D.
2022 WL 1028024, No. Painaway advertised its products as “Australia’s No. 1 Joint & Muscle Spray and Cream Topical Pain Relief Brand” on: (1) its Australian website; (2) socialmedia; and (3) Ultimate Fighting Championship (“UFC”) athletes’ clothing in matches televised in the United States. MaxRelief USA, Inc.,
17-cv-7394 (LJL), 2022 WL 421135 (S.D.N.Y. 11, 2022) So very much going on here, including discussion of what makes controls appropriate and the challenges of surveying for materiality; I will try to skip as much detail as possible but this is roughly 200 pages of opinions. In re: Elysium Health-ChromaDex Litigation, No.
19-md-02913-WHO, 2022 WL 2343268 (N.D. 28, 2022) A lot going on here, including a certification of a RICO class, believe it or not. Variations in different marketing campaigns and channels (socialmedia versus traditional media) did not defeat predominance. In Re Juul Labs, Inc., I don't even have a RICO tag!
The judgement was passed in October 2022, but was uploaded in September 2023 on the High Court’s website. Further, the judgement also sets aside the 4 factor test in the 2022 Nokia v. While the details of the agreement are yet to be disclosed, it was announced in April 2023, though signed in October 2022.
29, 2022) MGFB runs the Flora-Bama Lounge, Package and Oyster Bar on the Florida-Alabama border. An online article used photos of the Lounge in its coverage of the series, and MGFB also submitted socialmedia posts. MGFB Properties, Inc. Viacom Inc, No. 21-13458 (11th Cir. The court of appeals affirms, on Rogers v.
Last month, as part of BakerHostetler’s “Look Back, Look Ahead: Advertising and Marketing Law in 2021 & 2022” webinar series, partners Craig A. In addition, in 2021, several state AGs announced that they have initiated investigations into allegedly improper marketing of socialmedia networks to minors.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content