article thumbnail

Retailer has standing to assert Lanham Act false advertising claims against its own supplier

43(B)log

SA-22-CV-00096-XR, 2022 WL 17086368 (W.D. 18, 2022) Lexmark provides standing to a purchaser because the harms it alleged are “commercial” harms. the Lanham Act false advertising claim survived. Those lost sales weren’t the result of people believing the false advertising—they were the result of the scheme being exposed.

article thumbnail

Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute False Advertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet v. Troia

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Troia , 2022 WL 3544170 (S.D.N.Y. 2022 WL 3647817 (E.D. Jargon Watch: The court describes competitive keyword advertising as “keyword conquesting.” The post Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute False Advertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet Case Citation : LoanStreet, Inc. Peninsula Components, Inc.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Top Trademark Trends of 2022

Erik K Pelton

Here are the biggest trademark stories of 2022 that we have been following at EMP&A. The application was initially approved and published for opposition in June 2022. On November 7 th , Conde Nast sued Drake and 21 Savage for $4 million for false advertising and infringing Vogue’s trademarks. © 2022 Erik M.

Trademark 130
article thumbnail

Crocs Versus Dawgs: The Federal Circuit Holds That Falsely Stating a Product is "Patented" Can Lead to A False Advertising Claim

JD Supra Law

On October 3, 2024, the Federal Circuit held that a false advertising cause of action arises where a party falsely claims that it holds a patent on a product feature and advertises the feature in a manner that causes consumers to be misled about the nature, characteristics, or qualities of the product. 2022-2160).

article thumbnail

dissatisfaction w/Amazon's partner program isn't TM infringement/false advertising

43(B)log

2022 WL 670919, NO. 7, 2022) Melwani owns the Royal Silk trademark for “a wide variety of products.” False designation of origin/false advertising: Lasoff v. And it dismissed false advertising claims as “duplicative of his infringement claim.” Amazon.com, Inc., C21-1329RSM (W.D. Amazon.com, Inc.,

article thumbnail

false advertising doesn't get around Dastar without some direct statements

43(B)log

3d -, 2022 WL 10551564, No. 18, 2022) Wolf designs and installs “vehicle wraps,” large vinyl graphics or decals applied to car bodies. But what about false advertising? Wolf Designs LLC v. Five 18 Designs LLC, F.Supp.3d CV-21-01789-PHX-ROS (D. Dastar barred a passing off claim.

article thumbnail

unexplained "3x more cutting power" could be false advertising when comparator was unexpected

43(B)log

Most of the claims failed on summary judgment, but part of Woodland’s claim against Fiskars for false advertising, based on Fiskars’s statements about the cutting power of its tools, and some of its statements that certain products were designed in the United States, did create factual issues for trial.