This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
SA-22-CV-00096-XR, 2022 WL 17086368 (W.D. 18, 2022) Lexmark provides standing to a purchaser because the harms it alleged are “commercial” harms. the Lanham Act falseadvertising claim survived. AHBP LLC v. More surprisingly (perhaps the court wanted to be sure it retained jurisdiction regardless of diversity?),
” I’ll focus on the falsedesignation of origin claim regarding Troia’s keyword ads. ” Following mid-2000s cases like Lamparello and Lucas Nursery , we rarely see such unforgiving anti-griper opinions that twist the Lanham Act to cover circumstances it was never designed to cover. 2022 WL 3647817 (E.D.
Wolf Designs LLC v. Five 18 Designs LLC, F.Supp.3d 3d -, 2022 WL 10551564, No. 18, 2022) Wolf designs and installs “vehicle wraps,” large vinyl graphics or decals applied to car bodies. Copyright: Three of Wolf’s customers allegedly opted to hire Five 18 to install vehicle wraps featuring designs Wolf owned.
Most of the claims failed on summary judgment, but part of Woodland’s claim against Fiskars for falseadvertising, based on Fiskars’s statements about the cutting power of its tools, and some of its statements that certain products were designed in the United States, did create factual issues for trial.
2022 WL 670919, NO. 7, 2022) Melwani owns the Royal Silk trademark for “a wide variety of products.” Falsedesignation of origin/falseadvertising: Lasoff v. And it dismissed falseadvertising claims as “duplicative of his infringement claim.” Amazon.com, Inc., C21-1329RSM (W.D. So too here.
27, 2021) Ideavillage sued CCB for trademark infringement and falsedesignation of origin related to Ideavillage’s “Copper Fit” line of copper-infused compression garments. Here, the court granted leave to amend to add a falseadvertising claim. Copper Compression Brands LLC, 2021 WL 5013799, No. 4604 (KPF) (S.D.N.Y.
16-5073, 2022 WL 3588024 (E.D. 22, 2022) The court here allows an antitrust claim to proceed based in part on allegedly false/misleading statements because they form part of the alleged anticompetitive product-hopping scheme and because the unique characteristics of the drug market make market-based responses to falseadvertising difficult.
Pacifici, 2022 WL 889275, No. 25, 2022) I know it probably seems sometimes like I approve of every expansive use of falseadvertising law, but sometimes even I find an aggressive position to go too far. ExeGi Pharma, LLC v. 1:21-CV-2134-TWT (N.D.
2022 WL 898598, No. 28, 2022) Take it away, Judge Altman: If you want to build with plywood in the United States, you generally need a certification— called a PS 1-09 stamp. pictures of not-good plywood from case Plaintiffs alleged both direct and contributory falseadvertising. 2022 WL 953150, No. Google, Inc.,
4th -, 2022 WL 2036293, No. 7, 2022) The court upheld a contempt finding based on an underlying falseadvertising claim. Also, there was no relevant difference between trademark and falseadvertising cases in terms of accepting informational harm. De Simone v. VSL Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 20-1846, No.
21, 2023) Deetsch alleged that he owned design patents for CPAP pillow products, which the Lei defendants infringed. They also allegedly used Deetch’s image in ads and on packaging, and allegedly falsely claimed on Amazon that their pillow products “were designed in the United States but are manufactured in China.”
23, 2024) The AG sued sellers of “unfinished frames and receivers” — also known as “80% lowers” or “receiver blanks” —designed to evade restrictions on gun sales. Lawmakers in New York City and New York State banned the sale of unfinished frames and receivers in 2020 and 2022, respectively. Arm or Ally, LLC, 2024 WL 756474, No.
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed and remanded a grant of summary judgment on a falseadvertising claim, concluding that a cause of action under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act can arise when a party falsely claims to hold a patent on a product feature and advertises that feature in a misleading way.
Google LLC, 2022 WL 17072948, No. 18, 2022) Short opinion, summarized by the opening paragraph: The plaintiffs in this case don’t like how Google facilitates online orders from their restaurants. They try to articulate claims for trademark infringement, counterfeiting, false association, and falseadvertising.
The plaintiffs claim it was a spoof app designed to steal cryptocurrency worth $5k in Diep’s case and $500k in Nagao’s case (ouch). FalseAdvertising. 2022 WL 4021776 (N.D. This lawsuit relates to the “Toast Plus” app that was available in Apple’s app store. ” Section 230. Apple, Inc.
21, 2022) District Judge George H. In the case, Plaintiff sued Defendant on April 18, 2022 accusing Defendant of infringing U.S. On July 12, 2022, the Court issued a scheduling order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) which stated that the “[l]ast day to amend without proceeding under Fed. In SSMiller IP LLC v.
On February 3 rd 2022 Nike Inc. sued StockX LLC for trademark infringement, falsedesignation of origin, trademark dilution, and related causes. On March 31, 2022, StockX filed a response explaining that the NFTs are not sold as virtual assets, but are rather to authenticate physical shoes. StockX Vault NFTs.
3:21-CV-00499 (JCH), 2022 WL 313965 (D. 2, 2022) The parties have a dispute over control of a fashion business. But the complaint didn’t actually allege that defendants advertised items from “The Line,” only that they sold them. Second, more fundamentally, this was conversion/breach of contract, not falseadvertising.
JC Penny, for example, has been hit with a class action lawsuit in the Southern District of California over its alleged advertising practice of using “false reference pricing.” Carranza claims that JC Penny falselyadvertises its products on its e-commerce website by listing a high reference price and the corresponding sale price.
GMP owns two federally registered trademarks: the “GOOD MEAT” standard character mark and the “GOOD MEAT BREAKDOWN” design mark. A notice of allowance issued in 2022. The falseadvertising claims are based on the allegation that the defendants falselyadvertise and promote their cultivated meat products as “real meat, made without.
Meeker, 2022 WL 6507718, NO. 19, 2022) Judge Cannon has done some other stuff, too. The Lanham Act claims were styled as false association, “false association with celebrity status,” falsedesignation of origin, and falseadvertising. La Dolfina S.A., 20-82231-CIV-CANNON/Reinhart (S.D.
3d -, 2022 WL 16806210, No. 8, 2022) Stiles invented the “Stiles Razor,” a patented disposable razor with a narrow blade for precise shaving. The remaining design patent claims also failed. The accused design’s grip was also contoured and textured, not angular and smooth. Walmart, Inc., 2:14-cv-02234-DAD-DMC (E.D.
18, 2022) Previous discussion (one of four opinions in the case that I blogged). The district court remitted the falseadvertising damage award from over $8,000,000 to under $85,000 to reflect that it wasn’t sure whether Utah residents (the ones surveyed) had the same definition of “local” as others. Sycamore, Nos.
8:22CV314, 2022 WL 15523245 (D. 27, 2022) A rare tortious interference/business defamation case that results in a preliminary injunction (converted from a TRO), based on claims of patent infringement made to plaintiff’s customers. Lite-Netics, LLC v. Nu Tsai Capital LLC, NO.
Stubenrauch, 2022 WL 2793579, No. 15, 2022) The parties in this case are former business associates, which is one reason there are so many different claims. Still, plaintiffs plausibly pled secondary meaning [at least of the design mark, I think[ and also plausibly pled that at least some of defendants’ materials infringed.
2022 WL 594833 (D. 2022 WL 670919 (W.D. March 7, 2022). ” The falsedesignation of origin claim is similarly governed by the Ninth Circuit’s Lasoff v. More Posts About Keyword Advertising. FTC. * New Jersey Attorney Ethics Opinion Blesses Competitive Keyword Advertising (…or Does It?).
2022 WL 1665453, No. May 25, 2022) Alcon sued Lens.com for federal and state falseadvertising and trademark claims. 1994), “before considering consumer survey evidence, a district court must, first, determine whether the designation of geographic origin is ‘geographically descriptive.’ Alcon Vision, LLC v.
JC Penny, for example, has been hit with a class action lawsuit in the Southern District of California over its alleged advertising practice of using “false reference pricing.” Carranza claims that JC Penny falselyadvertises its products on its e-commerce website by listing a high reference price and the corresponding sale price.
CV-21-00228-TUC-SHR, 2022 WL 3098042 (D. 4, 2022) Frequent IP claimant Lisa Frank is in court this time over a failed deal with a vegan cosmetics company, whose contract aspects I will ignore. Lanham Act falseadvertising: Were the statements “commercial advertising or promotion” even though not in a conventional ad?
2022 WL 3647817, No. 24, 2022) This seems like a silly result to me, shifting the burden to comparative advertisers, but it's often much harder to get summary judgment in a trademark case than in comparable cases. the design Peninsula, like PennEngineering, makes floating fasteners with square-in-square designs.
11, 2024) I have a long-running interest in Rule 68 offers of judgment, and this case involves an interaction with falseadvertising law! Trial was scheduled for 2022 (!), The parties compete in the shoe market. In 2006, Crocs sued now-plaintiff Double Diamond and Dawgs, its affiliate.
8:22-cv-827-JVS-KESx, 2022 WL 17328411 (C.D. OSD Audio then sued Outlaw under §512(f), and Outlaw counterclaimed for falseadvertising and unfair competition under the Lanham Act, copyright infringement, and trade libel. Lanham Act: The user manual did not constitute “commercial advertising or promotion.” Santos Elecs.
11, 2022) This is the main liability opinion. Thus, any falseadvertising claim would lie against Albaum, not [directly] against ChromaDex. What about statements about how a product was “designed”? Elysium said that its proprietary formulation of two ingredients was “designed” to work together synergistically.
19-cv-218-wmc, 2022 WL 1718901 (W.D. May 27, 2022) Previously, the district court found that AB’s anti-Miller/Coors campaign was falseadvertising “to the extent it was designed to mislead consumers into believing corn syrup remained in Miller Lite and Coors Light products after the brewing process was completed.”
2022 WL 17218077, No. 2, 2022) Before the jury verdict in favor of Monster’s falseadvertising claim was this opinion resolving evidentiary issues. However, they fail to show that Monster dirtied its hands to make the falseadvertising claims now alleged against Defendants.” Monster Energy Co.
2022 WL 2383722, No. 28, 2022) BD and its subsidiary (BD) sell urologic devices and supplies, including catheter trays, which compete with Medline’s. The court grouped the Lanham Act falseadvertising and New Jersey statutory and common law unfair competition claims together. Becton, Dickinson & Co. Medline Indus.,
20, 2022) Plaintiffs rented Yesterday on Amazon, allegedly in reliance on the trailer, which contained a scene/subplot that ultimately never appeared in the final movie featuring famous actress Ana De Armas. Although expressing some skepticism, the court found that they stated a valid falseadvertising claim.
1, 2024) “Qoins is a financial technology company that collects funds from its customers and disburses payments to designated creditors in order to help its customers pay off their debts.” But SouthState did have standing for a falseadvertising claim. Qoins Technologies, Inc., 3d -, 2024 WL 911075, No. 1:22-CV-5020-MHC (N.D.
NFT background: In early 2022, StockX introduced Vault NFTs, which featured Nike’s trademarks and provided the holder ownership of an associated physical item. As for the positivity of the ads, “consumer surveys in falseadvertising cases commonly display the challenged advertisement.”
Zuluaga told a designer to look at Industria’s website when creating Latinfood’s packaging designs for Zenú and Ranchera and brought one of Industria’s Ranchera labels to the designer’s office. Advertisements made for Latinfood Zenú products used the phrase “una deliciosa tradición,” which translates to “a delicious tradition.”
MaddenCo owns Copyright Registration Number TX0009171151 entitled “The Tire Dealer System” with an effective registration date of August 26, 2022. Per Plaintiff’s website, MaddenCo is a privately held family business and has been for over 40 years. According to the complaint, both Defendants Reed and Darby were employed by MaddenCo.
19-CV-7577 (KMK), 2022 WL 4368036 (S.D.N.Y. 20, 2022) Plaintiff PCC sued NABP, a nonprofit whose membership consists of state/similar political unit boards of pharmacy (some other pharmacy associations/partnerships are also separate defendants), alleging violations of the Sherman Act and falseadvertising under the Lanham Act.
21, 2022) District Judge George H. In the case, Plaintiff sued Defendant on April 18, 2022 accusing Defendant of infringing U.S. On July 12, 2022, the Court issued a scheduling order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) which stated that the “[l]ast day to amend without proceeding under Fed. Patent Nos.
2022 WL 1157481, No. 19, 2022) The parties compete to supply Pacific Gas & Electric Company with specialized guards that protect birds and other animals from electrocution. The resulting ECC-3, which is designed for cutouts made out of porcelain, is Eco’s most successful product and is also sold to other utility companies.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content