This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Brough Brothers alleged that Fresh Bourbon falselyadvertised that Fresh Bourbon is the first black-owned bourbon distillery in Kentucky, and made other related claims. Fresh Bourbon didnt lease a facility until early 2022 and did not obtain the required federal and state licenses to operate a distillery until September 2022.
Also, there should not be a “use in commerce” when the advertiser (here, Troia) doesn’t actually offer any goods or services in the marketplace. As the court says later, “it seems unlikely that an Internet user who reads defendant’s advertisements would believe that they belong to or are endorsed by plaintiffs.”
SA-22-CV-00096-XR, 2022 WL 17086368 (W.D. 18, 2022) Lexmark provides standing to a purchaser because the harms it alleged are “commercial” harms. Lynd advertised the Product as effective against the coronavirus. the Lanham Act falseadvertising claim survived. AHBP LLC v.
3d -, 2022 WL 10551564, No. 18, 2022) Wolf designs and installs “vehicle wraps,” large vinyl graphics or decals applied to car bodies. But what about falseadvertising? Thus, Wolf didn’t plead the requisite “false statement of fact” in a “commercial advertisement.” Wolf Designs LLC v. CV-21-01789-PHX-ROS (D.
On October 3, 2024, the Federal Circuit held that a falseadvertising cause of action arises where a party falsely claims that it holds a patent on a product feature and advertises the feature in a manner that causes consumers to be misled about the nature, characteristics, or qualities of the product. 2022-2160).
2022 WL 670919, NO. 7, 2022) Melwani owns the Royal Silk trademark for “a wide variety of products.” False designation of origin/falseadvertising: Lasoff v. And it dismissed falseadvertising claims as “duplicative of his infringement claim.” Amazon.com, Inc., C21-1329RSM (W.D. Amazon.com, Inc.,
Most of the claims failed on summary judgment, but part of Woodland’s claim against Fiskars for falseadvertising, based on Fiskars’s statements about the cutting power of its tools, and some of its statements that certain products were designed in the United States, did create factual issues for trial.
8, 2023) When does TM logic creep into falseadvertising cases? The screenshot was “commercial advertising or promotion.” On materiality, it sufficed to allege that brands pay for its services and Tundra’s falseadvertising influences brands to purchase Tundra’s services instead of Faire’s services. Tundra, Inc.,
2022 WL 5245633, No. 6, 2022) The district court reverses the bankruptcy court ruling ( discussed here ) that held that falseadvertising had interfered with the debtor’s estate in violation of the automatic stay. In re Windstream Holdings, Inc., 21-CV-4552 (CS) (S.D.N.Y.
2022 WL 1203742, No. 22, 2022) Part of a larger dispute; the National Association of Realtors (NAR) counterclaimed against REX for falseadvertising in violation of the Lanham Act. However, NAR didn’t allege that any consumers or brokers have withheld trade from NAR as a result of the advertisements. Zillow, Inc.,
Despite Romag , the court declines to award disgorgement or fees in this falseadvertising case. A jury found that Harbor Breeze proved all elements of liability for falseadvertising but awarded $0 in damages and profits. And they used the phrase “Feel the Harbor Breezes” in a pay-per-click advertisement on Google.
1:21-cv-10688-IT, 2022 WL 4626918 (D. 30, 2022) Plaintiff, d/b/a Logan Car Service, has offered limousine and transportation services primarily in the Greater Boston area since the 2000s and uses logancarservice.com to do so. Boston Carriage, Inc. Boston Suburban Coach, Inc., Boston Suburban is a competitor.
27, 2021) Ideavillage sued CCB for trademark infringement and false designation of origin related to Ideavillage’s “Copper Fit” line of copper-infused compression garments. Here, the court granted leave to amend to add a falseadvertising claim. Materials revealed in discovery can support a finding of good cause.
12, 2023) Following a large verdict for Monster on falseadvertising claims, this opinion discusses extensively the requirements for injunctive relief in falseadvertising cases. But Defendants have brought on themselves these unfortunate consequences through their falseadvertising.”
January 5, 2022), the Court granted Defendant Next Caller’s post-trial renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law of no falseadvertising under the Lanham Act and to take away the jury’s award of punitive damages. Next Caller, Inc. Civil Action No. 18-172-MN (D.Del. The Court granted Defendant’s motion for two reasons.
16-5073, 2022 WL 3588024 (E.D. 22, 2022) The court here allows an antitrust claim to proceed based in part on allegedly false/misleading statements because they form part of the alleged anticompetitive product-hopping scheme and because the unique characteristics of the drug market make market-based responses to falseadvertising difficult.
3d -, 2022 WL 3453395, S260736 (Cal. 18, 2022) Not bound by Article III, the California Supreme Court issued a ruling despite the parties’ settlement. The First Amendment has long coexisted with no-fault falseadvertising laws. citing both UCL and Lanham Act claims, including falseadvertising claims.] “The
2022 WL 621815, No. 3, 2022) Plaintiffs sued the makers of Dude Wipes [I really must ask: are men ok?] for falselyadvertising them as “flushable” under California’s CLRA/UCL/FAL, NY’s GBL, Illinois’s ICFA, and breach of warranty. Dude Prods., 21-cv-00682 (N.D.
2023 WL 2298748, 2022-1433 (Fed. TRUSTID lost both patent infringement and Lanham Act falseadvertising claims. Next Caller’s Head of Sales instructed his team to “jack that stat or make up a number like 8%” for Next Caller’s product, so Next Caller advertised VeriCall as providing a 10 percent increase in IVR containment rates.
To many trademark owners, it’s a simple decision to sue when the advertiser includes the trademark in the ad copy. 2022 WL 4596646 (C.D. July 24, 2022). More Posts About Keyword Advertising. Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute FalseAdvertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet Allied Modular Building Systems, Inc.
BPI Sports, LLC, 2022 WL 612669, No. 2, 2022) The court of appeals upholds the rejection of ThermoLife’s falseadvertising claims (Lanham Act and Florida’s FDUTPA) on statutory standing grounds. ThermoLife Int’l LLC v. 21-15339 (9 th Cir. ThermoLife’s allegations were too speculative to establish proximate causation.
2022 WL 898598, No. 28, 2022) Take it away, Judge Altman: If you want to build with plywood in the United States, you generally need a certification— called a PS 1-09 stamp. pictures of not-good plywood from case Plaintiffs alleged both direct and contributory falseadvertising. Structural Plywood Integrity Coalition v.
Pacifici, 2022 WL 889275, No. 25, 2022) I know it probably seems sometimes like I approve of every expansive use of falseadvertising law, but sometimes even I find an aggressive position to go too far. ExeGi Pharma, LLC v. 1:21-CV-2134-TWT (N.D.
2022 WL 141561, No. 14, 2022) Once in a blue moon, a falseadvertising-based antitrust claim survives a motion to dismiss in a circuit that imposes a list of excessive requirements on such claims. Facebook, Inc., 20-CV-08570-LHK (N.D. That time has come for Facebook.
The US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed a district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of a defendant baker on a trade dress infringement claim and reversed the district court’s denial of the defendant baker’s motions for judgment as a matter of law on trade secrets misappropriation and falseadvertising claims.
4th -, 2022 WL 2036293, No. 7, 2022) The court upheld a contempt finding based on an underlying falseadvertising claim. The injunction didn’t define the term, but since it was based on a Lanham Act violation, “commercial advertising or promotion” was the proper guidepost. De Simone v. VSL Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
When the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals recently evaluated these words used to promote a bakery's bread, it deemed the tagline not actionable as falseadvertising and merely opinion. But could a competitor sue under the Lanham Act if those "local" goods are actually shipped over from a neighboring state? A lack of "verifiable factual.
4th -, 2022 WL 2125492, No. 14, 2022) Discussion of opinion below , which had more clownish behavior; the issue on appeal is narrower. American Society of Home Inspectors, Inc. International Ass’n of Certified Home Inspectors, F.4th 21-1087 (10th Cir. But wasn’t InterNACHI alleging sole competition?
He sent two letters by mail in March 2022, but was told he needed to use the Brand Registry … which he had already done. Amazon’s Brand Registry advertises “Automated Protections” that are “[p]owered by Amazon’s Machine Learning.” Since the designs were not plainly dissimilar, infringement was plausible. Motion to dismiss granted.
8:22-cv-827-JVS-KESx, 2022 WL 18396275 (C.D. 12, 2022) Reconsidering its previous decision as to the Lanham Act claim , the court granted a preliminary injunction against counterclaim defendant Santos dba OSD. Still, a portion of the decline could still be attributable to the false statement. Santos Elecs.
4th -, 2022 WL 664918, No. 7, 2022) Plaintiffs sued defendants for violating § 1125(a). A jury found that defendants had engaged in materially false or misleading advertising about the parties’ competing whale-watching-cruise business in violation of the Lanham Act, but the jury awarded $0 in actual damages. “The
Lawmakers in New York City and New York State banned the sale of unfinished frames and receivers in 2020 and 2022, respectively. The advertising bit: Defendants allegedly misled New York customers into “believing that unfinished frames and receivers are legal workarounds to New York’s gun control laws, as well as federal law.”
Its principal, Patton, allegedly promoted the business “by creating a fictionalized crisis between [FedEx] and its ISPs and TSPs as an advertisement for the purported need for Route Consultant’s consultancy and other services.” Was this “commercial advertising or promotion”? For “[a]lmost all of the.
American Marriage Ministries, 2022 WL 2317439, No. 28, 2022) The parties compete to provide online ordinations to individuals who wish to perform marriage ceremonies and accuse each other of misconduct in advertising. Lexmark , the court held, didn’t supersede the presumption of injury for false comparative advertising.
3d 444, 2022 WL 16640767, 2022 N.Y. 3, 2022) The trial court found Image liable for falseadvertising of an unapproved medical procedure (removing fat cells and reinjecting them elsewhere in the patient’s body). Image Plastic Surgery, LLC , N.Y.S.3d 3d -, 210 A.D.3d 06181 (App.
3d -, 2022 WL 3008304, 138 Nev. 28, 2022) The state supreme court denied mandamus against a district court order reinstating a deceptive trade practices complaint based on false claims about the safety of tobacco products. Plaintiffs also sufficiently pled that they were directly harmed by RJR’s false and misleading advertising.
January 5, 2022), the Court granted Defendant Next Caller’s post-trial renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law of no falseadvertising under the Lanham Act and to take away the jury’s award of punitive damages. Next Caller, Inc. Civil Action No. 18-172-MN (D.Del. ” Id.
2022 WL 2205263, -- F. 22, 2022) Held: A warranty is not “commercial advertising or promotion” under the Lanham Act. Plaintiffs sued for breach of contract under Tennessee common law and falseadvertising in violation of the Lanham Act. (OK, Plateau Casualty Ins. Securranty, Inc., 3d --, No. 2:22-cv-00007 (M.D.
January 5, 2022), the Court granted Defendant Next Caller’s post-trial renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law of no falseadvertising under the Lanham Act and to take away the jury’s award of punitive damages. By Memorandum Opinion entered by the Honorable Maryellen Noreika in TRUSTID, Inc. Next Caller, Inc.,
4 th , 2022 WL 39839, No. 5, 2022) The court finds that, contrary to the district court’s holding, at least some of the underlying lawsuit’s allegations claimed that Vitamin Energy made disparaging statements about 5-hour Energy, thus triggering the insurer’s duty to defend under its “advertising injury” policy. Evanston Ins.
Google, LLC , 2022 WL 451876 (Ga. More Posts About Keyword Advertising. Competitive Keyword Advertising Claim Fails–Reflex Media v. lululemon. * Ohio Bans Competitive Keyword Advertising by Lawyers. * Want to Engage in Anti-Competitive Trademark Bullying? Case Citation : Edible IP, LLC v. 1-800 Contacts v. Greenberg v.
11, 2022) This is the main liability opinion. Was this commercial advertising or promotion? Elysium argued that the website as a whole was a referral website for Tru Niagen, which advertised Tru Niagen at the top of every page. Thus, any falseadvertising claim would lie against Albaum, not [directly] against ChromaDex.
Creager sells Montana post drivers (made in China) that compete with the Texas post drivers sold by IDT (advertised as made in the USA). The parties had other disputes, including accusing each other of posting false reviews of the other. The parties compete in the market for skid steer attachments and other products.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content