The TTABlog

MAY 29, 2024

The Board observed that "[t]he critical inquiry in determining whether a proposed mark functions as a trademark is how the relevant public perceives the term sought to be registered." 2021 WL 839189, at *13. Simply calling A S LIVE FOREVER a brand cannot transform an otherwise unregistrable designation into a registrable mark."

Service Mark 91

Service Mark Branding Brands Branding 91

IP Intelligence

JANUARY 4, 2022

If you desire to register a service mark asserting use that is preparatory for the rendering of your services, your application will fail in the U.S. Instead, the services must be actually rendered in connection with the mark for a registration to be granted. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Suuberg , at p.

Service Mark 52

Service Mark Registration Trademark Advertising 52

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 4, 2022

If you desire to register a service mark asserting use that is preparatory for the rendering of your services, your application will fail in the U.S. Instead, the services must be actually rendered in connection with the mark for a registration to be granted. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). ” Id.

Service Mark 52

Service Mark Registration Trademark Advertising 52

The IPKat

SEPTEMBER 15, 2022

One of the first enacted changes concerned the rules for calculation of the compensation paid to the patent owner in the event that an invention, utility model, or industrial design is being used without the patent owner’s authorization. These rules were introduced in the 2021 amendment to Article 1360 of the Civil Code.

IP 132

IP Brands Branding Branding 132

43(B)log

OCTOBER 4, 2021

Vining, 2021 WL 4344891, No. Defendants' letter allegedly copied text from LStar Trademark infringement: LStar never specified what its trademarks or service marks were. False designation of origin: Failed to state a passing off claim, but Dastar didn’t bar a reverse passing off claim. LStar Development Gp.,

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Contracts 59

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

AUGUST 18, 2021

After acquiring the Fort Wayne Rickers stores, Plaintiffs apparently became aware of Defendants’, Get 2 Go , Virk Brothers, LLC, and Charanjit Singh, use of the name and trademarks GET 2 GO in connection with three retail convenience stores in Fort Wayne (the “Infringing Marks”). Service Mark Registrations, Nos.

Trademark 52

Trademark Registration Service Mark Advertising 52

The TTABlog

FEBRUARY 1, 2024

Here are three recent TTAB rulings, each sustaining an opposition based upon non-use of the opposed service mark. For a service mark, the services must be rendered in order to qualify as "use in commerce" as defined in Section 45 of the Lanham Act. BlackBerry Limited v. Hotberry LLC , Opposition No.

Service Mark 49

Service Mark Registration Technology Designs 49