The TTABlog

MAY 29, 2024

Last year, the Board affirmed a refusal to register the proposed mark A S LIVE FOREVER , in the stylized form shown below, for various goods in 14 classes, finding that the phrase fails to function as a trademark. See Mayweather , 2020 WL 6689736, at *3. TTABlogged here ]. In re Kirill’s Big Brain, LLC , Serial No.

Service Mark 91

Service Mark Branding Brands Branding 91

IP and Legal Filings

FEBRUARY 2, 2024

Introduction A mark represents the institution or company to which it belongs and serves as a means of differentiating goods or services among individuals. Marks can be of various types i.e., word marks, service marks, logos, symbols, series marks, etc [1].

Trademark Law 98

Trademark Law Trademark Law Service Mark 98

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

AUGUST 18, 2021

Wayne, Indiana – Phoenix Intangibles Holding Company apparently licenses the getGo® trademark to Giant Eagle, Inc. According to the Complaint, Giant Eagle acquired the Rickers convenience store chain in 2018 and eventually rebranded those stores under the getGo® marks. Service Mark Registrations, Nos. Registration No.

Trademark 52

Trademark Registration Service Mark Advertising 52

The TTABlog

DECEMBER 31, 2021

33: "LOCH MOOSE MONSTER" Fends Off Monster Energy's Lack-of-Bona-Fide-Intent Summary Judgment Motion Nonuse/Specimen of Use: USPTO Issues Examination Guide 1-21: Expungement and Reexamination Proceedings Under the Trademark Modernization Act of 2020 Precedential No. Lack of Bona Fide Intent: Precedential No.

Registration 69

Registration Cinema Trademark Reporting 69

The IPKat

JULY 4, 2021

Kluwer Trademark Blog reported on the application. Recently, Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Russia have made a collective endeavor to move towards the formation of a regional system dealing with trade marks, service marks and appellations of origin of goods in the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU).

Blogging 66

Blogging IP Designs Design 66

LexBlog IP

SEPTEMBER 29, 2022

–Penn State Football @PennStateFball on 12/7/2020. I am unaware of any reported comparison, but I did find the latter compared to a toilet flushing and have seen the former’s trademark suffer indignities at times too ). Every sound trademark seems not only to signify something but to raise a question or two as well.

Trademark 52

Trademark Registration Music Intellectual Property 52

IP and Legal Filings

MARCH 28, 2024

V RGV Film Factory” [4] , the court rules that a movie title’s eligibility for trademark protection depends on its acquisition of secondary meanings and uniqueness. [5] Ameya Vinod Khopkar Entertainment, 2020 SCC OnLine Bom 11301 [9] Rakshana. 20, 2023) [link] [6] Supra note [7] Akashaditya Harishchandra Lama v.

Cinema 98

Cinema Copyright Blogging Registration 98