This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Victory operates as Brough Brothers, which claims it was the first African American owned bourbon distillery in the Commonwealth of Kentucky, with the requisite licenses to operate a distillery by September 2020. By December of that year, it had distilled bourbon and filled its first bourbon barrel in a leased Kentucky facility.
In summer 2020, AHBP began negotiating with the Lynd defendants for the exclusive license to market and sell a surface disinfectant/cleaner known as “Bioprotect 500” in Argentina. the Lanham Act falseadvertising claim survived. SA-22-CV-00096-XR, 2022 WL 17086368 (W.D. Comment: This is a proximate cause question.
The Watkins expert calculated Watkins’s lost profits during the Walmart test; the profits Watkins would have realized between 2015 and 2020 if the test had been successful and Walmart had expanded the distribution of Watkins’s black pepper to 3,000 stores; and McCormick’s profits from its reduced-volume tins. The court disagreed. Edriver Inc.,
2, 2021) Rex sued Zillow and the National Association of Realtors for antitrust and falseadvertising violations. Surprisingly, the antitrust claims survive, as do falseadvertising claims agains Zillow. C21-312 TSZ, 2021 WL 3930694 (W.D. NAR “is the nation’s largest trade association for real estate professionals.”
2020 WL 9210739, No. 6, 2020) From the deepest depths of backlog: Tocmail alleged that Microsoft’s deceptive promotions of its cyber-security service, Safe Links, constituted falseadvertising and contributory falseadvertising. This wasn’t enough to state a claim for contributory falseadvertising. “[T]he
Defendants allegedly copied key components of Trackman’s copyrighted software and falsely suggested, in promotions and advertisements, that defendants were authorized to use the well-known courses in their game. Although the court dismissed a contract claim, copyright and falseadvertising claims survived.
Unsurprisingly, the trademark claims survive a motion to dismiss, but associated falseadvertising claims don’t. VFB alleged trademark infringement, and that the Vampiro Cocktail label’s claims that it is made from 100% agave and with grapefruit were falseadvertising that would tarnish and dilute VFB’s marks.
From 2015 to 2020, ASHI featured the following slogan on its website below its organizational logo: “American Society of Home Inspectors. They offer memberships to home inspectors, who typically inspect homes prior to home sales; they are currently the only two national bodies of this type.
In August 2020, Krikor discovered that Sports Mall had posted at least six of her photographs on its website and advertised the depicted items for sale on its site…. This alleged chutzpah triggered the falseadvertising element of the case. “[T]he Sports Mall operates its own website. Query: are there actual damages?
15, 2023) Simpson sued its competitor MiTek for using Simpson part numbers for structural connectors/fasteners for use in the construction industry in its catalogs/other promotional material; the court here, after a nonjury trial before the magistrate judge, rather comprehensively rejects its falseadvertising, trademark, and copyright claims. (It
17, 2020) A lot of stuff here; I will ignore the non-falseadvertising related aspects of this mostly antitrust case. The court says the usual not-good things about falseadvertising’s relationship to antitrust, unfortunately: Deceptive speech usually doesn’t violate antitrust laws. 17-md-2785-DDC-TJJ (D.
The allegedly false statements made various claims about the precarity of CSPs/FedEx’s responsibility therefor, such as, after referencing the economic changes over the past 12 months, “there has been no financial adjustment in any capacity”; the “average FedEx Ground business run by a CSP currently operates on profit margins below 0%”; since the Q4 (..)
. § 1117(a)(2), a successful falseadvertising plaintiff can recover the costs of any completed advertising that actually and reasonably responds to the defendant’s offending ads.’” Id.
In case you missed it, here is my Trademark Nominative Fair Use of Another’s Logo post from March, leading up to the 2020 AIPLA Annual Spring Meeting. The post 2020 Midwest IP Institute in the Books appeared first on DuetsBlog ®.
They also allegedly used Deetch’s image in ads and on packaging, and allegedly falsely claimed on Amazon that their pillow products “were designed in the United States but are manufactured in China.” Falseadvertising, Amazon defendants: The complaint didn’t explain how any of the statements about the Brand Registry were false or misleading.
In 2020, Medina got the disclosures from the 2014 case sealed. He then sued the court document repository websites (and other defendants) for defamation, falseadvertising, and more. The trial court anti-SLAPPED that lawsuit. The appeals court affirms. I’ll concentrate on the Section 230 discussion.
Courts have rejected Section 230 defenses against claims for falseadvertising, deceptive trade practices, and tortious interference. 29 (2020); U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE’S REVIEW OF SECTION 230 OF THE COMMUNICATIONS DECENCY ACT OF 1996 (2020). See, e.g., E-Ventures Worldwide, LLC v. Google, Inc. , 3d 1265 (M.D.
This is a falseadvertising lawsuit again the mobile app game Game of Thrones: Conquest. Also, the district court took issue with the 2020 call-to-action referring to the TOS as “Terms of Use” when it was actually the “Terms of Service.” sought to send the case to arbitration. Warner Bros.
Since in or about late 2020, ML Fashion has been receiving calls from vendors about unpaid bills or about where to ship certain goods that have turned out to be for Nobelle.” But the complaint didn’t actually allege that defendants advertised items from “The Line,” only that they sold them.
On November 7 th , Conde Nast sued Drake and 21 Savage for $4 million for falseadvertising and infringing Vogue’s trademarks. 2020: [link]. The court issued a preliminary injunction and the duo agreed to no longer use Vogue’s marks in connection with the album. Metaverse and NFT Filings Decrease. 2019: [link]. 2018: [link].
Eat Just, GMI’s parent company, filed an ITU for a stylized GOOD Meat mark in 2020; in 2021, defendants entered into agreements granting their security interests in the intent-to-use application to a third party, and also Eat Just assigned the entirety of its business having an interest in the GMI mark to GMI.
Fresh Bourbon allegedly falselyadvertises that Fresh Bourbon is the “first black-owned bourbon distillery in Kentucky,” and makes other related false claims, which is allegedly false because it’s not a distillery, which requires both federal (TTB) and Kentucky (KABC) licenses.
16, 2021) Previous ruling ; new judge still finds the falseadvertising claims sufficiently pled. Thus, Microsoft allegedly falselyadvertises its scanner as possessing a security capability that it does not actually possess; TocMail identified statements such as “a higher standard of security at lower cost than. [is
In 2020, the plaintiff learned that “Defendant was using Plaintiff’s Marks in online tamale advertisements and in Google AdWords, which placed Defendant’s products above Plaintiff’s products in search results for the phrase ‘Texas Tamale.'” Allied Modular * Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute FalseAdvertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet
9, 2023) Along with updating its previous decision (I didn’t see anything that affected the Lanham Act analysis of the key issue of whether a retailer can sue a supplier for falseadvertising), the court addressed a motion to dismiss by defendant ViaClean.
7, 2023) Navatar sued for state and federal falseadvertising, as well as commercial defamation, injurious falsehoods, unfair competition. Navatar Group, Inc. DealCloud, Inc., 2023 WL 1797266, No. 21-cv-1255 (SHS) (S.D.N.Y. Navatar provides cloud-based customer relations management software services to global financial customers.
28, 2022) Chanel sued What Goes Around Comes Around (WGACA), alleging trademark infringement, falseadvertising, false association/endorsement, and related NY GBL claims for deceptive/unfair trade practices and falseadvertising. WGACA, LLC, 2022 WL 902931, No. 2253 (LLS) (S.D.N.Y.
OSD Audio then sued Outlaw under §512(f), and Outlaw counterclaimed for falseadvertising and unfair competition under the Lanham Act, copyright infringement, and trade libel. Lanham Act: The user manual did not constitute “commercial advertising or promotion.” But “[n]ot all commercial speech is promotional.” Prager Univ.
Beyond 79, LLC, 2020 WL 9848431, No. 15, 2020) Previous opinion. Previously, some falseadvertising claims were dismissed, but claims “based on the Today Show-related advertising” were sufficiently pled. Express Gold Cash, Inc. 18-CV-00837 EAW (W.D.N.Y.
2020 WL 8509658, No. 23, 2020) MFSA brought trademark dilution and falseadvertising claims against Netflix for its portrayal in the film “The Laundromat.” Libel/false light claims aren’t addressed in this decision; see below.) Rogers governed the falseadvertising claim. (Not 2020 WL 8510342, No.
Falseadvertising/passing off: Same basic problems. But Mandabach waited until November 2020 to sue and moved for a preliminary injunction only in March 2021. as a result of the dispute with Defendants and their continued unauthorized use of the Peaky Blinders” marks.
For example, according to the complaint: On August 19, 2020, Plaintiff searched for “Royal Silk” under all departments on Amazon.com, yielding 60 product listings, including “Sponsored” product listings—ads paid for by the seller. FTC. * New Jersey Attorney Ethics Opinion Blesses Competitive Keyword Advertising (…or Does It?).
Ethicon first filed a complaint against the defendant Mudassar Shah in July 2020 and alleged federal and state trademark infringement of five different trademarks. Ethicon is a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson and won an $18 million default judgment.
I n mid-2020, Marchese allegedly contacted Wakefern about the possibility of joining the Wakefern cooperative. Perhaps overreacting, Wakefern sued for trademark infringement and falseadvertising in violation of the Lanham Act and violation of state unfair competition law, which is coextensive and thus disappears from our story.
2020 WL 9422352, No. 14, 2020) BHRS, which makes water cooler products, sued its competitor Brio for state and federal falseadvertising and trade libel. Brio Water Technol. 2:20-CV-07652-JWH-JCx (C.D.
It sought to represent a class bringing state law claims for fraudulent concealment, unfair business practices, and falseadvertising. 2020), the plaintiff needed to allege that it lacked an adequate remedy at law, which it did not allege. The court granted the motion to dismiss. Premier Nutrition Corp., 3d 834 (9th Cir.
Lanham Act falseadvertising: The theory was that Meta misrepresented “the creation and ownership” of Logan’s photos. Dastar doesn’t clearly bar falseadvertising §43(a)(1)(B) claims in general, but it does bar the claim as pled here: “a copyright claim repackaged under a trademark statute.” 3d 1137 (9th Cir.
24, 2021) Plaintiffs sought class certification of their falseadvertising claims based on the claims that KIND falselyadvertised “All Natural / Non-GMO,” “Non-GMO,” and “No Genetically Engineered Ingredients”; KIND sought to exclude expert reports. 2020), held that past purchasers couldn’t maintain an injunctive class.
In addition, ITW didn’t show actual injury; in the Second Circuit, literal falsity alone isn’t enough to presume injury in the absence of comparative advertising as well as direct competition. This wasn’t comparative advertising (or a two-player market). Epoxy: In J-B Weld Co., Gorilla Glue Co., 3d 778 (11th Cir.
2, 2022) Before the jury verdict in favor of Monster’s falseadvertising claim was this opinion resolving evidentiary issues. However, they fail to show that Monster dirtied its hands to make the falseadvertising claims now alleged against Defendants.” Monster Energy Co. Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2022 WL 17218077, No.
In 2020, Dr. Moline and several co-authors published an article in the widely read Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. The opinion “focused on the weight to be given to Dr. Moline’s public statements is by suing her for trade libel, fraud, or falseadvertising.” Reliance was not plausible.
In 2020, Jackson “happened to be in the proximity” of MedSpa’s location. “At Florida law prohibits the unauthorized publication of a person’s name or likeness for a commercial or advertising purpose without express written or oral consent. Falseadvertising: Same. 12, 2022) Jackson, aka 50 Cent, is a famous artist.
They are: the Unfair Competition Law (UCL); the FalseAdvertising Law (FAL); and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA). While they often cover the same conduct in falseadvertising cases and are cumulative of each other, they have differences. 5th 642, 651 (2020). 5th 279, 306 (2020) (quoting § 17500).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content