This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Chapman (‘plaintiffs’) collectively filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against Netflix, Amazon, and Apple (‘defendants’), claiming that the defendants had directly and indirectly infringed their copyright over the song “ Fish Sticks n’ Tater Tots ” by using it in their documentary titled ‘Burlesque’ ( Brown v. Netflix , Inc. ).
Supreme Court affirmed the Second Circuit’s ruling that the reproduction of Andy Warhol’s Orange Prince on the cover of a magazine tribute was not a fairuse of Lynn Goldsmith’s photo of the singer-songwriter Prince, on which the Warhol portrait was based. This has important implications for the doctrine of fairuse.
The Conan Doyle estate, heirs to the author of the works about the famed detective Sherlock Holmes, alleged that Netflix infringed on the character Sherlock Holmes in its portrayal of Sherlock Holmes in the 2020 movie “Enola Holmes.” [2] 5] Netflix and the estate quickly settled. [6]. 5] Netflix and the estate quickly settled. [6].
By adopting the unique narrative structure of its books and using the specific phrase “Choose Your Own Adventure Book,” Chooseco accused Netflix of willfully infringing its trademark and ultimately tarnishing the series’ child-friendly reputation. Photo retrieved from Tubefilter.
Late 2020, Senator Thom Tillis released a discussion draft of the “Digital Copyright Act” (DCA), which aims to be a successor to the current DMCA. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), for example, stresses that automated filtering tools often miss important context that can differentiate between clear copyright infringement and fairuse.
The future of “controlled digital lending” is in doubt after a court rules that the Internet Archive’s online library is not protected by fairuse. IA’s Open Library project includes millions of publicdomain books that users can download and read without restriction. It also includes 3.6
Internet Archive (read the opinion here) , the court dealt a decisive blow to the Internet Archive, ruling that its practice of scanning and lending digital copies of books doesn’t qualify as fairuse under the Copyright Act. Internet Archive’s “Table Top Scribe” book scanner. It also includes 3.6 For research.
The court also credits the self-serving claim by the successor licensee that it considered fairuse by comparing the works and evaluating if the works were being sold commercially or for other purposes. Anthony, 2020 WL 11206863 (N.D. New Destiny Church. * ‘Reaction’ Video Protected By FairUse–Hosseinzadeh v.
A first-of-its-kind decision in 2020 proclaimed the copyright of the article generated by Tencent’s Dreamwriter software, the majority opinion was decided on the basis that the software operates under human direction. Copyright Office: Outputs created by AI could resemble copyrighted works, leading to potential disputes.
On December 22, 2020, Senator Thom Tillis released the first discussion draft of the Digital Copyright Act of 2021 (“DCA” or the “Act”): an amendment to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”). A German professor of music theory received Content ID Claims for recordings in the publicdomain uploaded by his YouTube channels.
In that case, the Court found that Google’s use of Java API naming conventions in its Android operating system was fairuse under copyright law. Because its fairuse decision decided the case, the court did not rule separately on whether the API was even copyrightable in the first place. 1183 (2021).
While the Court did not disapprove of application of the Rogers test, it also did not approve of use of this speech-protective test (unlike the Congressional members of the House Judiciary Committee: see the “Balancing First Amendment concerns” section of the legislative history for the Trademark Modernization Act of 2020 ).
The lawsuit involves sound recordings of 19 interviews that then-President Trump voluntarily gave to Woodward between December 2019 and August 2020, plus one interview from 2016 (when Trump was still a candidate). If the work was published without proper copyright notice, the work entered the publicdomain. complaint filed Jan.
Government by its officers and employees should not be subject to copyright” and fall “in the publicdomain.” 1498, 1509-10 (2020). ” US Const., [is] that works produced for the U.S. ” H.R. 94-1476 at 58 (1976); see also Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 140 S. ’” Id.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content