Copyright Lately

FEBRUARY 2, 2025

Public domain works are freeunless misinformation and aggressive claims deter the public from freely using them. public domain 95 years after their initial publication by Belgian artist Herg. January 27, 2025 email from Tintinimaginatio to Duke Law’s Center for the Study of the Public Domain.

Public Domain 96

Public Domain Copyright Cease and Desist Publishing 96

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

MAY 13, 2024

And that, in turn, further restricts what should be in the public domain and gives companies power to create property rights where none are otherwise granted in the law. Facebook objected and sent a cease-and-desist letter. Here, the court agreed, and dismissed Twitter’s breach-of-contract claims on that basis.

Blogging 123

Blogging Contracts Cease and Desist Social Media 123

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

DECEMBER 15, 2021

30, 2021): Plaintiff alleges that Defendants knew that Defendant Wagner did not own the copyright to the images that Plaintiff posted on its social media channels, because Wagner abandoned the copyrights when he executed the Stipulation of Settlement, which dedicated the intellectual property rights of the images to the public domain.

Registration 132

Registration Fair Use Copyright Design 132

SpicyIP

MAY 15, 2023

Other Posts World of Possibilities: Single Judge Bench of Delhi High Court Allows Use of Celebrity Information Available in Public Domain Delhi High Court specifies some contours of publicity rights in India! Deadline for the Applications: 11:59pm IST, 23rd June, 2023.

Trademark 104

Trademark Registration Cease and Desist IP 104

IIPRD

JANUARY 23, 2023

Patent are valid for the duration of 20 years before coming into public domain) Patent infringement can occur in two ways. 8] Cease and desist letters are also measures to tackle such infringement wherein the seller is demanded to stop the sale of the product and never sell it again. LEXIS 24421. [7]

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent Cease and Desist IP 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JUNE 21, 2023

While the Court did not disapprove of application of the Rogers test, it also did not approve of use of this speech-protective test (unlike the Congressional members of the House Judiciary Committee: see the “Balancing First Amendment concerns” section of the legislative history for the Trademark Modernization Act of 2020 ).

Trademark 105

Trademark Blogging Trademark Law Fair Use 105