Remove 2020 Remove Artistic Work Remove Brands
article thumbnail

Amici Urge SCOTUS to Reverse Overly Broad Definition of ‘Expressive Work’ in Jack Daniel’s v. VIP Products

IP Watchdog

Supreme Court granted a petition for writ of certiorari filed by famed whiskey brand owner Jack Daniel’s Properties. Last November, the U.S. The petition filed by Jack Daniel’s appealed the U.S. Several amici also pushed back on the Ninth Circuit’s ruling that VIP Products’ use of Jack Daniel’s marks was noncommercial.

article thumbnail

Bombay High Court Rules that Copyright Registration of a Label is not Compulsory

Kashishipr

Under Section 2(c) of The Copyright Act of 1957 , the label is an original artistic work. It was in October 2020 when SSPL came to know about NTC’s use of a similar label and trade dress for its set of soya bean edible oil products. In May 2007, the label mark ‘SOYA DROP’ was registered.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

When Doors Close, A Market Grows: Museums, COVID-19, and Cultural Digitisation

IPilogue

In 2020, visitor figures for the world’s top 100 art museums dropped by 77%. Many museums have made high-resolution images of their collections available online, including the Victoria and Albert Museum, whose online portal hit a record-high level of audience engagement in 2020. and the U.S. New York art attorney Amelia K.

Marketing 111
article thumbnail

IPEC serves up a hot trade mark exhaustion decision, with a side of Cofemel, in AGA Rangemaster v UK Innovations

The IPKat

The First Defendant, UK Innovations Group Limited (UKIG), was set up in 2020 to launch a product known as the “Stone Cooker”, a range cooker with an electric control system (eControl System) developed by the Second Defendant, Mr McGinley.

article thumbnail

Copyright Infringement Case Concerning Photos of Jennifer Lopez Gets Dismissed: An Overview of the August Image LLC v AirG Inc Decision

IPilogue

August asserts that the Defendant, AirG Inc, a Canadian social media brand, committed copyright infringement by reproducing six of Pugliese’s Jennifer Lopez photos on their website without permission. In 2020, AirG was involved in a similar copyright infringement action, Lickerish, Ltd. They sought $22,412.45 Another Escape by AirG.

article thumbnail

Jack Daniels Finally Has its Day Before the Supreme Court

LexBlog IP

There the Second Circuit held that “section 43(a) of the Lanham Act does not bar a minimally relevant use of a celebrity’s name in the title of an artistic work where the title does not explicitly denote authorship, sponsorship, or endorsement by the celebrity or explicitly mislead as to content.” Grimaldi , 875 F.2d

article thumbnail

Supermarket Showdown (Lidl v Tesco) – Lidl’s rights (trade marks and copyright) in the Lidl logo are infringed by Tesco’s “Clubcard Price” signs

Kluwer Copyright Blog

On copyright subsistence, the judge held that the Mark with Text is an artistic work, failing within the sub-category of “graphic works”. Tesco is descried as a “mid-tier” supermarket: it has a “selection of own-brand and third party products at a range of price points” (Paragraph [51]).