Remove 2020 Remove Advertising Remove Service Mark
article thumbnail

Get 2 Go Sued for Alleged Trademark Infringement of getGo®

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

Because several of the getGo® Marks have been in use continuously since at least 2003, and Plaintiffs apparently complied with all further requirements, they are incontestable under 15 U.S.C. Further, Giant Eagle claims it has spent millions of dollars to advertise and promote its services using the getGo® Marks.

article thumbnail

Precedential No. 20: Supplemental Registration for PERMITS.COM Cancelled by Prior User of PERMIT.COM Despite No Acquired Distinctiveness

The TTABlog

Each party acknowledged in its brief that the word PERMIT or PERMITS, combined with the top-level domain.COM, "constitutes, at the very least, a descriptive and non-inherently distinctive term in connection with their services." Furthermore, petitioner's sales and advertising figures were not placed in industry context.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Precedential No. 33: #LAW Fails to Function as a Source Indicator for Legal Referral Services, Says TTAB

The TTABlog

The Board observed that, as made clear by the Trademark Act, the USPTO "is statutorily constrained to register matter on the Principal Register if and only if it functions as a mark." See , e.g. , In re Texas With Love, LLC , 2020 USPQ2d 11290, at *2 (TTAB 2020). In re Brunetti , 2022 USPQ3d 764, at *9.

Law 40
article thumbnail

What’s in a number? A discussion of two decisions concerning rights in telephone numbers

IP Whiteboard

The first is a recent decision of the Australian Federal Court in Manly Warringah Cabs (Trading) Co-operative Limited v Sydney Taxis Pty Ltd, in the matter of Sydney Taxis Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 1336. In August 2020, a provisional liquidator was appointed to Sydney Taxis on the application of Manly Cabs.

Brands 40