2019 Contracts Derivative Work Licensing 
LexBlog IP
MAY 19, 2023
In 1984, Vanity Fair sought to license the photograph for an “artist reference” in a story about the musician. Goldsmith agreed to license a one-time use of the photograph with full attribution. scholarship, or research” [2] and is evaluated through multiple factors.
43(B)log
FEBRUARY 3, 2023
Hughes: it was the Fairness in Music Licensing Act, not the DMCA, which was intertwined. E.g., these images were good, so you should apply a quality multiplier; scarce, so you should apply a scarcity multiplier to the standard quoted rate; also P didn’t want to license them so should get an exclusivity multiplier. 3) “So what?”
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JUNE 20, 2023
Legal Background: Copyright and Derivative Works Copyright law protects original works of authorship, including “pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works,” 17 U.S.C. For obvious reasons, the copyright in a photograph does not include the right to publicly perform the copyrighted work.
SpicyIP
MAY 23, 2024
Saregama Vodafone Injunction against exploitation of copyright in sound recording and allied copyright work via VAS. One of the key features was recognition of the rights of authors of original literary, dramatic, artistic and musical work, used in derivative works. Do A ll Rights Subsist with the First Owner?
LexBlog IP
APRIL 13, 2022
Although none has reached a resolution, these private civil actions highlight various legal theories of liability that could arise when participating in the NFT market, including claims for copyright infringement, trademark infringement, breach of contract and violations of securities laws. Copyright Claims: Roc-A-Fella Records Inc.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
FEBRUARY 13, 2023
The lawsuit involves sound recordings of 19 interviews that then-President Trump voluntarily gave to Woodward between December 2019 and August 2020, plus one interview from 2016 (when Trump was still a candidate). The Falwell court was on solid ground in denying relief on the grounds of an implied license. Simon & Schuster, Inc.
The IP Law Blog
FEBRUARY 23, 2023
Woodward interviewed Trump, both in person and over the phone, on numerous occasions during 2019 and 2020. The complaint notes a December 30, 2019 interview which, according to Trump, exemplifies that the rights granted were limited: Woodward: On the record for the book, unless you— Trump: For the book only, right? Only for the book.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content