Remove 2018 Remove Advertising Remove Personality Rights
article thumbnail

A blow to image rights?: the Supreme Court rules on the protection of the personality rights of deceased celebrities

Garrigues Blog

The Supreme Court has again ruled on the protection of the personality rights of deceased celebrities. Analyzed in conjunction with the previous Dalí judgment, this new ruling may introduce some uncertainty as to the post mortem scope of protection of such rights. The Supreme Court’s opinion.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (December 16 – December 22)

SpicyIP

Marico had sought injunction on Alpinos advertisement alleging generic disparagement of oats. The respondent had obtained registration of the mark ‘NIPPU’ in 2018 on a ‘proposed to be used’ basis. Alpino and Generic Disparagement: Alpino seeks vacation of ex-parte injunction alleging suppression of facts.

IP 59
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (January 6 – January 12)

SpicyIP

Here is our recap of last weeks top IP developments including summaries of the posts on Lemleys and Hendersons paper on AI Terms of Use Restrictions, CGPDTM order on the removal of a patent agent, Delhi HC order on disclosure of a PhD and Public Interest Need in Personality Rights cases. Anything we are missing out on?

article thumbnail

Book Review: Overlapping Intellectual Property Rights 2nd Edition

SpicyIP

Started in 2018, the 2nd edition of Overlapping IP Rights (OUP) was brought to completion in 2023 by his co-editor, the inimitable Prof Neil Wilkof, along with Prof Irene Calboli who came on as a co-editor following Prof Basheer’s demise. The jurisdictions analysed are the US, UK, and the European Union.

Editing 81
article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2023

SpicyIP

[Delhi High Court] On September 20, the Delhi High Court granted relief to film actor Anil Kapoor against the unauthorised use of his image, name, voice, and other traits of his persona for monetary gain, reinforcing his personality rights. Sarl a A Sarogi , where the Court affirmed the position on descendability of publicity rights.

IP 124
article thumbnail

Right of Publicity Part 2

IP and Legal Filings

the Apex Court held that one of the inherent aspects of the right to privacy as enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution is the right to prevent others from using the person’s name or likeness without his consent for advertising or non-advertising purposes. RFMLR (2018) 1 Titan Industries Limited v.

Privacy 105