2017 Copyright Infringement Derivative Work Intellectual Property Law 
JIPL Online
APRIL 9, 2021
In particular, it explores why copyright of a meme’s underlying content does not matter in a normative sense. In this blog I argue that copyright protection of the content underlying memes does not matter because of the relative weakness of enforcement mechanisms for copyright infringement of this scale. Stearns, Todd J.
IP and Legal Filings
JUNE 29, 2024
The personality rights in India are generally enforced in the context of Intellectual Property Laws. Even though Section 52 of the Copyright Act classifies any artistic work under fair use, it is imperative to note that it does not safeguard total imitation of a work. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1. [3]
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
LexBlog IP
OCTOBER 25, 2023
Larson also sought a declaration that she owns the copyright to The Kindest and that the letter in the short story does not infringe Dorland’s copyright. Dorland counterclaimed for copyright infringement, claiming that Larson’s use of Dorland’s letter was a violation of intellectual property law.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
AUGUST 1, 2023
Copyright Act grants authors five exclusive rights: “to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or phonorecords”, “to prepare derivative works based on the copyrighted work,” “to distribute copies or phonorecords of the copyrighted work to the public,” “to perform the copyrighted work publicly,” and “to display the copyrighted work publicly.”
Kluwer Copyright Blog
NOVEMBER 8, 2021
“The European Court of Justice (CJEU) ruling in joined cases C-682/18 (YouTube) and C-683/18 (Cyando), concerning platform liability for copyright-infringing user uploads under Art. ” 3) Derivative works: the Adventures of Koons and Tintin in French copyright law by Brad Spitz. here and here).
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content